Literature DB >> 23278338

Biodiversity and composition of methanogenic populations in the rumen of cows fed alfalfa hay or triticale straw.

Yunhong Kong1, Yun Xia, Robert Seviour, Robert Forster, Tim A McAllister.   

Abstract

It is clear that methanogens are responsible for ruminal methane emissions, but quantitative information about the composition of the methanogenic community in the bovine rumen is still limited. The diversity and composition of rumen methanogens in cows fed either alfalfa hay or triticale straw were examined using a full-cycle rRNA approach. Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization undertaken applying oligonucleotide probes designed here identified five major methanogenic populations or groups in these animals: the Methanobrevibacter TMS group (consisting of Methanobrevibacter thaueri, Methanobrevibacter millerae and Methanobrevibacter smithii), Methanbrevibacter ruminantium-, Methanosphaera stadtmanae-, Methanomicrobium mobile-, and Methanimicrococcus-related methanogens. The TMS- and M. ruminantium-related methanogens accounted for on average 46% and 41% of the total methanogenic cells in liquid (Liq) and solid (Sol) phases of the rumen contents, respectively. Other prominent methanogens in the Liq and Sol phases included members of M. stadtmanae (15% and 33%), M. mobile (17% and 12%), and Methanimicrococcus (23% and 9%). The relative abundances of these methanogens in the community varied among individual animals and across diets. No clear differences in community composition could be observed with dietary change using cloning techniques. This study extends the known biodiversity levels of the methanogenic communities in the rumen of cows.
© 2012 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23278338     DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  6 in total

1.  Differences in the methanogen population exist in sika deer (Cervus nippon) fed different diets in China.

Authors:  Zhi Peng Li; Han Lu Liu; Chun Ai Jin; Xue Zhe Cui; Yi Jing; Fu He Yang; Guang Yu Li; André-Denis G Wright
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Investigation and manipulation of metabolically active methanogen community composition during rumen development in black goats.

Authors:  Zuo Wang; Chijioke O Elekwachi; Jinzhen Jiao; Min Wang; Shaoxun Tang; Chuanshe Zhou; Zhiliang Tan; Robert J Forster
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Impact of selected environmental factors on microbiome of the digestive tract of ruminants.

Authors:  Paulina Cholewińska; Wanda Górniak; Konrad Wojnarowski
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  An antimethanogenic nutritional intervention in early life of ruminants modifies ruminal colonization by Archaea.

Authors:  Leticia Abecia; Kate E Waddams; Gonzalo Martínez-Fernandez; A Ignacio Martín-García; Eva Ramos-Morales; C Jamie Newbold; David R Yáñez-Ruiz
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 3.273

5.  Bacteria and methanogens differ along the gastrointestinal tract of Chinese roe deer (Capreolus pygargus).

Authors:  Zhipeng Li; Zhigang Zhang; Chao Xu; Jingbo Zhao; Hanlu Liu; Zhongyuan Fan; Fuhe Yang; André-Denis G Wright; Guangyu Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Characterizing the Alteration in Rumen Microbiome and Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes Profile with Forage of Muskoxen Rumen through Comparative Metatranscriptomics.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Wu; Chijioke O Elekwachi; Shiping Bai; Yuheng Luo; Keying Zhang; Robert J Forster
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-12-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.