PURPOSE: We describe the clinical, neuroimaging and pathological features and therapeutic outcome in a large cohort of 39 patients with tumefactive demyelination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective audit of 39 patients with 'tumefactive demyelination' was performed. The demographic, clinical, MR imaging and pathological details were reviewed. RESULTS: The clinical course was monophasic (n = 22) or relapsing-remitting (n = 17). Common neurological manifestations at presentation included hemiparesis - 27; ataxia - 11; vomiting - 10; headache -9; ophthalmoplegia - 7; seizure - 5; impaired vision - 4; aphasia - 4; visual field defects - 3; papilloedema - 5; extrapyramidal - 5; intellectual decline - 5; behavioural disturbances - 3; altered sensorium - 5. MRI revealed fronto-parietal lesions, which were isolated in 14 (36%) patients. Moderate perilesional oedema and/or mass effect was noted in 12 (30.8%) patients. Post-contrast MR sequences revealed partial ring enhancement in 15, complete ring in seven, patchy enhancement in six, uniform enhancement in two and lack of enhancement in nine cases. Clinical and MR characteristics did not help distinguish between monophasic and relapsing-remitting subgroups. In the monophasic group, 53.8% had complete recovery, while 38.5% had partial improvement (follow-up duration, 8.31 ± 9.3 months). In the relapsing-remitting subgroup, the median time to relapse was 4 months (n = 12, follow-up, 37.8 ± 39.4 months). Patients with monophasic course or single relapse received steroids. Patients with more than one relapse received cyclophosphamide (2), mycophenolate (1), azathioprine (1) or methotrexate (1). CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of cases of tumefactive demyelination follow a relapsing course, thus necessitating a long-term follow-up. MRI, although helpful in diagnosis, does not predict monophasic or relapsing-remitting course. Guidelines for the management of acute episodes and prevention of relapses are required.
PURPOSE: We describe the clinical, neuroimaging and pathological features and therapeutic outcome in a large cohort of 39 patients with tumefactive demyelination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective audit of 39 patients with 'tumefactive demyelination' was performed. The demographic, clinical, MR imaging and pathological details were reviewed. RESULTS: The clinical course was monophasic (n = 22) or relapsing-remitting (n = 17). Common neurological manifestations at presentation included hemiparesis - 27; ataxia - 11; vomiting - 10; headache -9; ophthalmoplegia - 7; seizure - 5; impaired vision - 4; aphasia - 4; visual field defects - 3; papilloedema - 5; extrapyramidal - 5; intellectual decline - 5; behavioural disturbances - 3; altered sensorium - 5. MRI revealed fronto-parietal lesions, which were isolated in 14 (36%) patients. Moderate perilesional oedema and/or mass effect was noted in 12 (30.8%) patients. Post-contrast MR sequences revealed partial ring enhancement in 15, complete ring in seven, patchy enhancement in six, uniform enhancement in two and lack of enhancement in nine cases. Clinical and MR characteristics did not help distinguish between monophasic and relapsing-remitting subgroups. In the monophasic group, 53.8% had complete recovery, while 38.5% had partial improvement (follow-up duration, 8.31 ± 9.3 months). In the relapsing-remitting subgroup, the median time to relapse was 4 months (n = 12, follow-up, 37.8 ± 39.4 months). Patients with monophasic course or single relapse received steroids. Patients with more than one relapse received cyclophosphamide (2), mycophenolate (1), azathioprine (1) or methotrexate (1). CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of cases of tumefactive demyelination follow a relapsing course, thus necessitating a long-term follow-up. MRI, although helpful in diagnosis, does not predict monophasic or relapsing-remitting course. Guidelines for the management of acute episodes and prevention of relapses are required.
Authors: A Siri; Clarisse Carra-Dalliere; X Ayrignac; J Pelletier; B Audoin; S Pittion-Vouyovitch; M Debouverie; C Lionnet; F Viala; D Sablot; D Brassat; J-C Ouallet; A Ruet; B Brochet; L Taillandier; L Bauchet; N Derache; G Defer; P Cabre; J de Seze; C Lebrun Frenay; M Cohen; P Labauge Journal: J Neurol Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Mirja Wallner-Blazek; Alex Rovira; Massimo Fillipp; Mara A Rocca; David H Miller; Klaus Schmierer; Jette Frederiksen; Achim Gass; Hugo Gama; Charles P Tilbery; Antonio J Rocha; José Flores; Frederik Barkhof; Alexandra Seewann; Jacqueline Palace; Tarek Yousry; Xavier Montalban; Christian Enzinger; Franz Fazekas Journal: J Neurol Date: 2013-04-26 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Matthew A Tremblay; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Soonmee Cha; Tarik Tihan; Jeffrey M Gelfand Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 3.181