Literature DB >> 23277901

The unintended consequences of bundled payments.

William B Weeks1, Stephen S Rauh2, Eric B Wadsworth1, James N Weinstein3.   

Abstract

Consensus is building that episode-based bundled payments can produce substantial Medicare savings, and the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation's Bundled Payment Initiative endorses this concept. The program generates potential cost savings by reducing the historic cost of time-defined episodes of care, provided through a discount. Although bundled payments can reduce waste primarily in the postacute care setting, concerns arise that, in an effort to maintain income levels that are necessary to cover fixed costs, providers may change their behaviors to increase the volume of episodes. Such actions would mitigate the savings that Medicare might have accrued and may perpetuate the fee-for-service payment mechanism, with episodes of care becoming the new service. Although bundled payments have some advantages over the current reimbursement system, true cost-savings to Medicare will be realized only when the federal government addresses the use issue that underlies much of the waste inherent in the system and provides ample incentives to eliminate capacity and move toward capitation.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23277901     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-1-201301010-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  21 in total

1.  Physician-management interactions in the current 2015 environment.

Authors:  Lanis L Hicks; Adam Bouras
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

2.  Computerized provider order entry reduces length of stay in a community hospital.

Authors:  R Schreiber; K Peters; S H Shaha
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  ESRD Payment Reform: First Do No Harm.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Keith C Norris
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Can vertically integrated health systems provide greater value: The case of hospitals under the comprehensive care for joint replacement model?

Authors:  Rachel M Machta; James Reschovsky; David J Jones; Michael F Furukawa; Eugene C Rich
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Interdependence in decision-making by medical consultants: implications for improving the efficiency of inpatient physician services.

Authors:  Adam S Wilk; Lena M Chen
Journal:  Hosp Pract (1995)       Date:  2017-11-10

6.  Impact of an Episode-Based Payment Initiative by Commercial Payers in Arkansas on Procedure Volume: an Observational Study.

Authors:  Julius L Chen; Michael E Chernew; A Mark Fendrick; Joseph W Thompson; Sherri Rose
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Medicare's Bundled Payment Program for Joint Replacement: Promise and Peril?

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  What Drives Variation in Episode-of-care Payments for Primary TKA? An Analysis of Medicare Administrative Data.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Bheeshma Ravi; Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin; Xin Lu; Yue Li; Gillian Hawker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Bundled Payments for Elective Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Medicare Administrative Data.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Yue Li
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2015-03

10.  Postacute Care Setting, Facility Characteristics, and Poststroke Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Matthew Alcusky; Christine M Ulbricht; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.