Literature DB >> 23277891

Congenital midline cervical cleft.

Bilal Mirza1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23277891      PMCID: PMC3525291     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APSP J Case Rep        ISSN: 2218-8185


× No keyword cloud information.
A 3-year-old boy presented with a midline skin defect in the center of the neck. On examination, a 6 cm long and about 1.5 cm wide lesion extending from hyoid bone to the suprasternal notch was noted. There was a nipple like skin hood at the cranial end of the defect with a sinus at the caudal part (Fig. 1). Figure 1: Congenital midline cervical cleft showing nipple like hood (1), cleft (2), and sinus (3). On palpation, sub-mental bony spur was felt. The defect was associated with limitation of neck extension. Surgery was offered. At operation the extent of the sinus was about 4-6mm. The skin defect along with its cranial and caudal lesions was excised. The surgical wound was closed with multiple z-plasties (Fig. 2). The postoperative recovery was uneventful. Histopathology of the specimen showed skin histology in the upper hood like part. The cleft portion was devoid of skin appendages, and the sinus tract was blind and lined by pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium. At follow up the neck extension has greatly improved. The parents were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome. Figure 2: Wound closure after excision of the defect.

DISCUSSION

Congenital midline cervical cleft (CMCC) is a rare anomaly and less than 100 cases have been reported to date [1]. The prevalence of CMCC in all cases of thyroglossal cyst and brachial cleft sinuses is 1.7% and it is considered a variant of Tessier 30 craniofacial cleft [1, 2]. It presents at birth as a visible defect in cervical region in the midline. CMCC consists of three parts, a nipple like skin hood at cranial end followed by a middle area of skin cleft with a small blind ending sinus caudally. Embryologically, most of the authors believe it to be the outcome of failure of branchial arches I and II, to fuse in the midline. The main indications of surgery are cosmetic, prevention of neck contracture, release of neck contracture in case of delayed presentation, and to some extent psychological effect on the patient. If left untreated for a longer period, the lesion would result in severe neck contracture. My patient presented at the age of 3 year with considerable limitation of extension of the neck. These defects can be excised elliptically with closure of the defect with and without Z-plasty. In case of small defect one Z-plasty can be sufficient, however in large defects, as in index case, multiple z plasties have to be performed. Some authors advocate use of skin flaps to cover the defect [1-5].

Footnotes

Source of Support: Nil Conflict of Interest: None declared
  5 in total

Review 1.  Congenital mid-line cervical cleft: case report and review of literature.

Authors:  A Mlynarek; A Hagr; T L Tewfik; V H Nguyen
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.675

2.  Congenital midline cervical cleft: a practical approach to Z-plasty closure.

Authors:  C Spencer Cochran; Robert J DeFatta; Amy C Brenski
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  A rare congenital midline cervical cleft.

Authors:  C Warden; A J W Millar
Journal:  S Afr J Surg       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 0.375

Review 4.  Congenital midline cervical cleft: case report and review of the English language literature.

Authors:  J P Eastlack; R M Howard; I J Frieden
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Congenital midline cervical cleft: diagnosis, pathologic findings, and early stage treatment.

Authors:  Xenophon Sinopidis; Helen P Kourea; Antonios Panagidis; Vasileios Alexopoulos; Sotirios Tzifas; Gabriel Dimitriou; George Georgiou
Journal:  Case Rep Pediatr       Date:  2012-10-09
  5 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Midline cervical cleft: review of an uncommon entity.

Authors:  Liana Puscas
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-23

2.  Is linear wound closure acceptable option for congenital midline cervical cleft excision in neonates?

Authors:  Xenophon Sinopidis; Antonios Panagidis; Vasileios Alexopoulos; George Georgiou
Journal:  APSP J Case Rep       Date:  2013-07-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.