PURPOSE: Multiple studies have shown that adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy in women with breast cancer is suboptimal. Measurements of compliance with self-report, pill counts, and/or pharmacy records are susceptible to bias. We assessed the feasibility of using a urine anastrozole assay as an objective biomarker of nonadherence to anastrozole treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited consecutive postmenopausal women, age ≥ 18 years, with hormone-sensitive nonmetastatic breast cancer who were prescribed anastrozole at least 3 months before enrollment. Each completed a short survey to gather information on demographics, anastrozole compliance history, and self-reported medication history, tumor characteristics, and treatment received. A single, random 15-mL urine sample was collected and tested for the presence of anastrozole using a previously validated assay. Patients were told they were part of a study to determine if anastrozole could be detected in the urine. RESULTS: Among 96 participants, mean age was 63.7 years (range, 51 to 70 years). The population was diverse, with 56.5% white, 57.6% US born, 59.8% unemployed, and 56.6% college educated. Prior treatment included chemotherapy (50%) and/or radiotherapy (58.7%). Mean duration of anastrozole treatment was 2.2 years (standard deviation, 1.6). Four participants reported nonadherence and declined to submit urine samples, and two had no detectable level of anastrozole (six of 96; 6.3%). Detectable levels among adherent women ranged from 49.3 to 632.8 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that collection of urine to measure anastrozole levels is feasible and reliable. Identifying biomarkers to measure adherence is critical for studies investigating interventions to improve hormonal therapy compliance.
PURPOSE: Multiple studies have shown that adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy in women with breast cancer is suboptimal. Measurements of compliance with self-report, pill counts, and/or pharmacy records are susceptible to bias. We assessed the feasibility of using a urine anastrozole assay as an objective biomarker of nonadherence to anastrozole treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited consecutive postmenopausal women, age ≥ 18 years, with hormone-sensitive nonmetastatic breast cancer who were prescribed anastrozole at least 3 months before enrollment. Each completed a short survey to gather information on demographics, anastrozole compliance history, and self-reported medication history, tumor characteristics, and treatment received. A single, random 15-mL urine sample was collected and tested for the presence of anastrozole using a previously validated assay. Patients were told they were part of a study to determine if anastrozole could be detected in the urine. RESULTS: Among 96 participants, mean age was 63.7 years (range, 51 to 70 years). The population was diverse, with 56.5% white, 57.6% US born, 59.8% unemployed, and 56.6% college educated. Prior treatment included chemotherapy (50%) and/or radiotherapy (58.7%). Mean duration of anastrozole treatment was 2.2 years (standard deviation, 1.6). Four participants reported nonadherence and declined to submit urine samples, and two had no detectable level of anastrozole (six of 96; 6.3%). Detectable levels among adherent women ranged from 49.3 to 632.8 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that collection of urine to measure anastrozole levels is feasible and reliable. Identifying biomarkers to measure adherence is critical for studies investigating interventions to improve hormonal therapy compliance.
Authors: Dawn Hershman; Russell McBride; Judith S Jacobson; Lois Lamerato; Kevin Roberts; Victor R Grann; Alfred I Neugut Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Howell; J Cuzick; M Baum; A Buzdar; M Dowsett; J F Forbes; G Hoctin-Boes; J Houghton; G Y Locker; J S Tobias Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jan 1-7 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ute Mareck; Hans Geyer; Sven Guddat; Nadine Haenelt; Anja Koch; Maxie Kohler; Georg Opfermann; Mario Thevis; Wilhelm Schänzer Journal: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Dawn L Hershman; Theresa Shao; Lawrence H Kushi; Donna Buono; Wei Yann Tsai; Louis Fehrenbacher; Marilyn Kwan; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Alfred I Neugut Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-08-28 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Timothy L Lash; Matthew P Fox; Jennifer L Westrup; Aliza K Fink; Rebecca A Silliman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2006-03-16 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Ekim Ekinci; Salima Nathoo; Thushara Korattyil; Aisha Vadhariya; Hanna A Zaghloul; Polly A Niravath; Susan M Abughosh; Meghana V Trivedi Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Krishna Patel; Nathan R Foster; Ann Farrell; Nguyet Anh Le-Lindqwister; Josy Mathew; Brian Costello; John Reynolds; Jeffrey P Meyers; Aminah Jatoi Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Dawn L Hershman; Alfred I Neugut; Anna Moseley; Kathryn B Arnold; Julie R Gralow; N Lynn Henry; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Scott D Ramsey; Joseph M Unger Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Dawn L Hershman; Joseph M Unger; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Anna Moseley; Kathryn B Arnold; Shaker R Dakhil; Benjamin T Esparaz; Ming C Kuan; Mark L Graham; Douglas M Lackowski; William J Edenfield; Zoneddy R Dayao; N Lynn Henry; Julie R Gralow; Scott D Ramsey; Alfred I Neugut Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 50.717