Literature DB >> 23277618

Cosmetic rhinoplasty: revision rates revisited.

Keith C Neaman1, Adam K Boettcher, Viet H Do, Corlyne Mulder, Marissa Baca, John D Renucci, Douglas L VanderWoude.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cosmetic rhinoplasty has great potential to change a patient's appearance. It also carries the very real risk of patient dissatisfaction and request for revision. Although there have been many published patient series studying various aspects of rhinoplasty, questions remain regarding revision rates, as well as risk factors for complications, dissatisfaction, and revision.
OBJECTIVES: The authors investigate the rate of cosmetic rhinoplasty revision at a plastic surgery group practice and identify risk factors for revision.
METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for all patients who presented to a single multisurgeon practice for primary rhinoplasty, septorhinoplasty, and revision rhinoplasty between 1998 and 2008. Patient demographics, preoperative complaints, preoperative physical examination findings, detailed operative data, and postoperative outcomes were abstracted from the charts. Complication rates, revision rates, and postoperative patient satisfaction were calculated and analyzed for identifiable risk factors.
RESULTS: Of 369 consecutive cosmetic rhinoplasties performed during the study period, 279 (72.7%) were conducted with an open approach. The overall complication, dissatisfaction, and revision rates were 7.9%, 15.4%, and 9.8%, respectively. Postoperatively, most patients (87%) were identified by their surgeons as having had successful anatomical correction of their nasal deformity. History of previous nasal operation or facial fracture, lack of anatomical correction, and occurrence of postoperative complications were associated with both revision and dissatisfaction (P < .05). Failure to address the nasal tip at the time of primary rhinoplasty was associated with a higher level of dissatisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Cosmetic rhinoplasty is one of the most challenging procedures in plastic surgery; however, these data indicate that a high level of patient satisfaction is attainable within a plastic surgery group practice if certain factors are considered. Specifically, surgeons should be aware of risk factors that are potentially associated with dissatisfaction and revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23277618     DOI: 10.1177/1090820X12469221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  11 in total

1.  Finite Element Model and Validation of Nasal Tip Deformation.

Authors:  Cyrus T Manuel; Rani Harb; Alan Badran; David Ho; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Revision Rates and Risk Factors of 175 842 Patients Undergoing Septorhinoplasty.

Authors:  Emily Spataro; Jay F Piccirillo; Dorina Kallogjeri; Gregory H Branham; Shaun C Desai
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

3.  Functional and Radiological Assessment After Preservation Rhinoplasty - A Clinical Study.

Authors:  Georges Stergiou; Mathias Tremp; Valerio Finocchi; Yves Saban
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 4.  Patient Satisfaction After Non-surgical Rhinoplasty Using Hyaluronic Acid: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Thomas Radulesco; Guillaume De Bonnecaze; Martin Penicaud; Patrick Dessi; Justin Michel
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 5.  Overview of Facial Plastic Surgery and Current Developments.

Authors:  Jessica Chuang; Christian Barnes; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2016-02-04

6.  Teenage Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Abdoljalil Kalantar-Hormozi; Roozbeh Ravar; Ali Abbaszadeh-Kasbi; Nazanin Rita Davai
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01

7.  Prevalence of considering revision rhinoplasty in Saudi patients and its associated factors.

Authors:  Najlaa Abdulrahman Alsubeeh; Mayar Abdulsalam AlSaqr; Mohammed Alkarzae; Badi Aldosari
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-12-10

8.  Change in surgeon for revision rhinoplasty: The impact of patient demographics and surgical technique on patient retention.

Authors:  Kayva L Crawford; Jason H Lee; Bharat A Panuganti; Brittany N Burton; Aria Jafari; David B Hom; Deborah Watson
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-12

9.  Functional and Aesthetic Factors Associated with Revision of Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Jebrane Bouaoud; Marine Loustau; Jean-Baptiste Belloc
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-09-05

10.  Acute symptomatic hyponatremia following elective rhinoplasty: A case report.

Authors:  Bradley R Hall; José A Aquino García; Perry J Johnson
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2018-07-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.