Literature DB >> 23276846

Order sets in electronic health records: principles of good practice.

John D McGreevey1.   

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR) order sets are common. Order sets represent one clinical decision support (CDS) tool within computerized provider order entry systems that may promote safe, efficient, and evidence-based patient care. A small number of order sets account for the vast majority of use, suggesting that some order sets have a higher value to clinicians than others. While EHR order sets can save time and improve processes of care, it remains less clear that EHR order sets have shown definite patient outcome benefits. There are general guidelines on CDS and usability that can be applied to the development of EHR order sets. Order set success requires leadership, planning, and resources as well as ongoing maintenance and evaluation. This article describes one academic medical center's experience in developing an EHR order set embedded with evidence-based principles and lessons learned for future order set development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23276846     DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-0949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  19 in total

Review 1.  Quality of care delivered to hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients.

Authors:  Adam V Weizman; Geoffrey C Nguyen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Formative Usability Testing Reduces Severe Blood Product Ordering Errors.

Authors:  Evan W Orenstein; Jeanne Boudreaux; Margo Rollins; Jennifer Jones; Christy Bryant; Dean Karavite; Naveen Muthu; Jessica Hike; Herb Williams; Tania Kilgore; Alexis B Carter; Cassandra D Josephson
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  The Impact of Changes to an Electronic Admission Order Set on Prescribing and Clinical Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Ellen T Muniga; Todd A Walroth; Natalie C Washburn
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Neurological Dashboards and Consultation Turnaround Time at an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Benjamin R Kummer; Joshua Z Willey; Michael J Zelenetz; Yiping Hu; Soumitra Sengupta; Mitchell S V Elkind; George Hripcsak
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 5.  Interventions and targets aimed at improving quality in inflammatory bowel disease ambulatory care.

Authors:  Adam V Weizman; Geoffrey C Nguyen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  A content analysis of electronic health record (EHR) functionality to support tobacco treatment.

Authors:  Jennifer M Schindler-Ruwisch; Lorien C Abroms; Steven L Bernstein; Christina L Heminger
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 7.  [Integrated care concepts and multidisciplinary process chains in a radiological context].

Authors:  J Bauer; E Kösel; A G Henkel; C D Spinner; R Kolisch
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Improved analgesia, sedation, and delirium protocol associated with decreased duration of delirium and mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Christopher R Dale; Delores A Kannas; Vincent S Fan; Stephen L Daniel; Steven Deem; N David Yanez; Catherine L Hough; Timothy H Dellit; Miriam M Treggiari
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2014-03

Review 9.  The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Alison Jennings; Alain Mayhew; Craig R Ramsay; Martin P Eccles; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

10.  Using lean methodology to improve efficiency of electronic order set maintenance in the hospital.

Authors:  Lori Idemoto; Barbara Williams; Craig Blackmore
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2016-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.