AIMS: To assess the effectiveness and safety of infrared coagulation (IRC) for the ablation of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) and to provide data on the prevalence of AIN in HIV-infected patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study based on data collected from a prospectively compiled database of outpatients attended in the Clinical-Proctology-HIV-Unit (first visit). The effectiveness (normal anal cytology after 12 months of IRC) and safety of IRC were estimated. RESULTS: Between January 2005 and December 2011, a total of 69 (5%) patients with biopsy-proven AIN-2 or AIN-3 from among 1518 patients (1310 men; 208 women) were treated with IRC. The prevalence of cytological abnormalities was 49.5% [751/1518; (atypical squamous cells of unknown significance, 14%; low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 27.5%; high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 8%)]. High-resolution anoscopy revealed intra-anal condylomata in 31% of patients (236/751), nonvisualized lesions in 30% (227/751), and visualized lesions (from which biopsy specimens were taken) in 38% (288/751). The histological diagnosis was: AIN-1, 52% (151/288); AIN-2, 15% (44/288); AIN-3, 9% (25/288); normal, 19% (56/288); and nonevaluable, 4% (12/288). IRC was applied in-office in 66 patients (three refused to undergo treatment). At 12 months, all patients (n = 56) had a normal anal cytology result. Seven (13%) patients had biopsy-proven recurrence [mean (range) time-to-recurrence, 30 (18-43) months]. High-risk-human papilloma virus (HPV) infection was detected in all anal lesions (HPV-16 was the most common genotype). Agreement between cytological and histological results was poor. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of AIN was found in both HIV-infected men and HIV-infected women. Although randomized clinical trials are lacking, IRC ablation of AIN-2 and AIN-3 lesions without concomitant condylomata could help prevent anal squamous cell carcinoma.
AIMS: To assess the effectiveness and safety of infrared coagulation (IRC) for the ablation of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) and to provide data on the prevalence of AIN in HIV-infectedpatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study based on data collected from a prospectively compiled database of outpatients attended in the Clinical-Proctology-HIV-Unit (first visit). The effectiveness (normal anal cytology after 12 months of IRC) and safety of IRC were estimated. RESULTS: Between January 2005 and December 2011, a total of 69 (5%) patients with biopsy-proven AIN-2 or AIN-3 from among 1518 patients (1310 men; 208 women) were treated with IRC. The prevalence of cytological abnormalities was 49.5% [751/1518; (atypical squamous cells of unknown significance, 14%; low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 27.5%; high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 8%)]. High-resolution anoscopy revealed intra-anal condylomata in 31% of patients (236/751), nonvisualized lesions in 30% (227/751), and visualized lesions (from which biopsy specimens were taken) in 38% (288/751). The histological diagnosis was: AIN-1, 52% (151/288); AIN-2, 15% (44/288); AIN-3, 9% (25/288); normal, 19% (56/288); and nonevaluable, 4% (12/288). IRC was applied in-office in 66 patients (three refused to undergo treatment). At 12 months, all patients (n = 56) had a normal anal cytology result. Seven (13%) patients had biopsy-proven recurrence [mean (range) time-to-recurrence, 30 (18-43) months]. High-risk-human papilloma virus (HPV) infection was detected in all anal lesions (HPV-16 was the most common genotype). Agreement between cytological and histological results was poor. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of AIN was found in both HIV-infectedmen and HIV-infectedwomen. Although randomized clinical trials are lacking, IRC ablation of AIN-2 and AIN-3 lesions without concomitant condylomata could help prevent anal squamous cell carcinoma.
Authors: Stephen E Goldstone; Shelly Y Lensing; Elizabeth A Stier; Teresa Darragh; Jeannette Y Lee; Annemieke van Zante; Naomi Jay; J Michael Berry-Lawhorn; Ross D Cranston; Ronald Mitsuyasu; David Aboulafia; Joel M Palefsky; Timothy Wilkin Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-03-19 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Robert N Goldstone; Shirin R Hasan; Steven Drury; Teresa M Darragh; Annemieke van Zante; Stephen E Goldstone Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: J Corral; D Parés; F García-Cuyás; B Revollo; S Videla; A Chamorro; M Piñol; B Clotet; G Sirera Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: G A Binda; G Gagliardi; I Dal Conte; M Verra; P Cassoni; E Cavazzoni; E Stocco; S Delmonte; P De Nardi; L Sticchi; M Mistrangelo Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2019-06-26 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: William C Mathews; Wollelaw Agmas; Edward R Cachay; Bard C Cosman; Christopher Jackson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maria Pujantell; Roger Badia; Iván Galván-Femenía; Edurne Garcia-Vidal; Rafael de Cid; Carmen Alcalde; Antonio Tarrats; Marta Piñol; Francesc Garcia; Ana M Chamorro; Boris Revollo; Sebastian Videla; David Parés; Javier Corral; Cristina Tural; Guillem Sirera; José A Esté; Ester Ballana; Eva Riveira-Muñoz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Danielle R L Brogden; Una Walsh; Gianluca Pellino; Christos Kontovounisios; Paris Tekkis; Sarah C Mills Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2020-09-26 Impact factor: 2.796