Literature DB >> 23276670

Comparing the after-effects of continuous theta burst stimulation and conventional 1 Hz rTMS on semantic processing.

S Brückner1, M Kiefer, T Kammer.   

Abstract

Our aim was to evaluate continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) as a tool to induce temporary impairment (virtual lesion) in semantic processing. Four groups with 20 subjects each were stimulated. In the three experimental groups the stimulation site was the left superior temporal cortex. Stimulation was either 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at 100% resting motor threshold (RMT) or cTBS, with intensities of 80% or 90% active motor threshold (AMT). The TMS-control group was stimulated at the right medial prefrontal cortex with 1 Hz rTMS. After stimulation subjects accomplished a lexical decision task with a duration of about 20 min. In an additional fifth group the lexical decision task was performed without TMS. Reaction times were not influenced by cTBS applied with 80% AMT, but prolonged for about 80 ms with 90% AMT compared to the no stimulation condition. An increase of 140 ms was found after 1 Hz rTMS. The effect lasted for the whole task, but declined from the first to the second half of the experiment. The direct comparison of cTBS and 1 Hz rTMS suggests that both stimulation patterns can induce virtual lesions in the left superior temporal cortex and impair semantic processing. We suppose that cTBS could replace 1 Hz rTMS in this field since the application is faster and it is more comfortable to the subjects.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23276670     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  11 in total

1.  Motor Cortex Causally Contributes to Vocabulary Translation following Sensorimotor-Enriched Training.

Authors:  Brian Mathias; Andrea Waibel; Gesa Hartwigsen; Leona Sureth; Manuela Macedonia; Katja M Mayer; Katharina von Kriegstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Arcuate fasciculus asymmetry has a hand in language function but not handedness.

Authors:  Jane B Allendorfer; Kathleen A Hernando; Shyla Hossain; Rodolphe Nenert; Scott K Holland; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Fronto-temporal interactions are functionally relevant for semantic control in language processing.

Authors:  Max Wawrzyniak; Felix Hoffstaedter; Julian Klingbeil; Anika Stockert; Katrin Wrede; Gesa Hartwigsen; Simon B Eickhoff; Joseph Classen; Dorothee Saur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Adaptive Plasticity in the Healthy Language Network: Implications for Language Recovery after Stroke.

Authors:  Gesa Hartwigsen
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex for psychiatric disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rodrigo C Marques; Larissa Vieira; Déborah Marques; Amaury Cantilino
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.697

6.  Transient perturbation of the left temporal cortex evokes plasticity-related reconfiguration of the lexical network.

Authors:  Jana Klaus; Dennis J L G Schutter; Vitória Piai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  High visual demand following theta burst stimulation modulates the effect on visual cortex excitability.

Authors:  Sabrina Brückner; Thomas Kammer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Is theta burst stimulation applied to visual cortex able to modulate peripheral visual acuity?

Authors:  Sabrina Brückner; Thomas Kammer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Resting-state and task-based centrality of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex predict resilience to 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Sophie M D D Fitzsimmons; Linda Douw; Odile A van den Heuvel; Ysbrand D van der Werf; Chris Vriend
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  The physiological effects of noninvasive brain stimulation fundamentally differ across the human cortex.

Authors:  Gabriel Castrillon; Nico Sollmann; Katarzyna Kurcyus; Adeel Razi; Sandro M Krieg; Valentin Riedl
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.