Literature DB >> 23276357

MRI reliability in classifying thoracolumbar fractures according to AO classification.

Ángel Salgado1, Javier Pizones, Felisa Sánchez-Mariscal, Patricia Álvarez, Lorenzo Zúñiga, Enrique Izquierdo.   

Abstract

The vertebral fracture patterns of AO classification have been established historically via radiograph and computed tomography analysis, achieving modest reproducibility values. The authors hypothesize that magnetic resonance imaging may improve reliability because it better indicates posterior ligamentous complex damage. They conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective recruited cohort of patients using radiographs and magnetic resonance images with fat saturation sequences to classify 37 traumatic vertebral fractures. Five spine surgeons, 2 orthopedic residents, 2 musculoskeletal radiologists, and 2 radiodiagnosis residents classified the morphological pattern of each fracture per AO classification in 2 separate sessions that occurred 6 weeks apart. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for AO classification types A, B, and C were assessed using the kappa test (pairwise method), and standard error was assessed using the jackknife method. Quantitative comparisons were performed using the Student's t test, and the kappas were performed using normal approximation. Mean interobserver agreement was kappa=0.53 and 0.47 for the first and second sessions, respectively, for all evaluators. Greater interobserver agreement was observed between the senior doctors (kappa=0.59 and 0.54 for the first and second sessions, respectively) vs residents (kappa=0.45 and 0.31 for the first and second sessions, respectively) (P=.02) and between orthopedic surgeons vs radiologists (kappa=0.71 vs 0.48, respectively) (P=.008). Mean intraobserver agreement was kappa=0.58 (range, 0.38-0.76). Evaluators more familiar with the classification obtained higher kappas. Magnetic resonance imaging offers moderate reproducibility in assessing vertebral fractures pursuant to AO classification, and results are slightly better than those reported with computed tomography. Reliability increases in the hands of experiened spine surgeons and improves with greater familiarization with the classification. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23276357     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20121217-22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  3 in total

1.  Reliability and Clinical Usefulness of Current Classifications in Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  I Curfs; M Schotanus; W L W VAN Hemert; M Heijmans; R A DE Bie; L W VAN Rhijn; P C P H Willems
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

2.  Prediction of posterior ligamentous complex injury in thoracolumbar fractures using non-MRI imaging techniques.

Authors:  Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran; Anupama Maheswaran; Siddharth N Aiyer; Rishi Kanna; Srikanth Reddy Dumpa; Ajoy Prasad Shetty
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  CT for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: Can CT findings accurately predict posterior ligament complex injury?

Authors:  Bharti Khurana; Luciano M Prevedello; Christopher M Bono; Erwin Lin; Steven T McCormack; Hamdi Jimale; Mitchel B Harris; Aaron D Sodickson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.134

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.