| Literature DB >> 23276146 |
Qingli Zhang1, Qinghui Zhang, Hua Cong, Xiaoli Zhang.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study is to explore the histopathological features and the molecular marker expression of young women with breast cancers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23276146 PMCID: PMC3541118 DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-7-181
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Figure 1Analysis of numbers of the female breast cancer case, including the young and older breast cancer cases, diagnosed in the hospital in the past 10 years.
Comparative analysis of the clinicopathological parameters in the young groups and old groups
| Tumor size | | | 7.053 | 0.029 * |
| ≤2 cm | 64 (35.4) | 81 (43.5) | | |
| >2 cm ≤5 cm | 94 (51.9) | 95 (51.1) | | |
| >5 cm | 23 (12.7) | 10 (5.4) | | |
| Pathological grading | | | 21.354 | 0.0001* |
| I | 4 (2.9) | 19 (12.1) | | |
| II | 97 (69.3) | 122 (77.7) | | |
| III | 39 (27.9) | 16 (10.2) | | |
| PTNM | 18.290 | 0.0001* | | |
| 0~I | 32 (17.7) | 59 (31.7) | | |
| II | 89 (49.2) | 97 (52.2) | | |
| III | 60 (33.1) | 30 (16.1) | | |
| Axillary lymph node metastasis | | | 18.707 | 0.0001* |
| yes | 106 (58.6) | 67 (36.0) | | |
| No | 75 (41.4) | 119 (64.0) | | |
| Axillary lymph node | | | 20.801 | 0.0001* |
| Transferring positive number | | | | |
| 0 | 75 (41.4) | 119 (64.0) | | |
| 1~3 | 47 (26.0) | 37 (19.9) | | |
| 4~9 | 28 (15.5) | 16 (8.6) | | |
| ≥10 | 31 (17.1) | 14 (7.5) |
Note: *, P < 0.05.
Comparative analysis of the immunohistochemical results of young and old patient groups
| BRCA1 | | | 53.206 | 0.001* |
| — | 37 (34.6) | 72 (64.3) | | |
| + | 13 (12.1) | 30 (26.8) | | |
| ++ | 38 (35.5) | 10 (8.9) | | |
| +++ | 19 (17.8) | 0 (0) | | |
| WWOX | | | 4.610 | 0.203 |
| — | 14 (13.1) | 15 (13.4) | | |
| + | 56 (52.3) | 56 (50.0) | | |
| ++ | 32 (29.9) | 27 (24.1) | | |
| +++ | 5 (4.7) | 14 (12.5) | | |
| ER | | | 3.867 | 0.276 |
| — | 36 (33.6) | 31 (27.7) | | |
| + | 48 (44.9) | 48 (42.9) | | |
| ++ | 16 (15.0) | 28 (25.0) | | |
| +++ | 7 (6.5) | 5 (4.5) | | |
| PR | | | 5.215 | 0.157 |
| — | 49 (45.8) | 67 (59.8) | | |
| + | 48 (44.9) | 34 (30.4) | | |
| ++ | 7 (6.5) | 7 (6.2) | | |
| +++ | 3 (2.8) | 4 (3.6) | | |
| C-erbB2 | | | 4.012 | 0.235 |
| — | 63 (58.9) | 81 (72.3) | | |
| + | 15 (14.0) | 12 (10.7) | | |
| ++ | 18 (16.8) | 9 (8.1) | | |
| +++ | 11 (10.3) | 10 (8.9) | | |
| Ki67 | | | 2.128 | 0.546 |
| <15% | 43 (40.2) | 50 (44.6) | | |
| ≥15% | 64 (59.8) | 52 (55.4) |
Figure 2A (young group) BRCA1 protein immunohistochemical staining was positive. The positive products localized in the cytoplasm (× 400). B (young group) BRCA1 protein immunohistochemical staining was positive. The positive products localized in the nucleus (× 400). C (old group) BRCA1 protein immunohistochemical staining was positive. The positive products localized in the cytoplasm (× 400). D (young group) WWOX protein immunohistochemical staining was positive. The positive products localized in the cytoplasm (× 400). E (old group) WWOX protein immunohistochemical staining was positive. The positive products localized in the cytoplasm (× 400). F (young group) ER protein immunohistochemical staining was positive. The positive product positioning in the nucleus (× 400). G (young group) positive immunohistochemical staining of PR proteins. The positive products localized in the nucleus (× 400) H (young group) C-erbB2 protein immunohistochemical staining was positive. The positive products localized in the membrane (× 400). I (young group) Ki67 protein immunohistochemical staining was positive. The positive products localized in the nucleus (× 400).
Analysis of the correlation between the BRCA1 results and clinicopathological parameters in the young groups and old groups
| | — | + | — | + | | |
| ER | | | | | 0.042 | 0.540 |
| — | 13 | 23 | 21 | 10 | | |
| + | 24 | 47 | 51 | 30 | | |
| PR | | | | | 0.073 | 0.282 |
| — | 20 | 29 | 42 | 25 | | |
| + | 17 | 41 | 30 | 15 | | |
| C-erbB2 | | | | | 0.051 | 0.452 |
| — | 29 | 49 | 59 | 34 | | |
| + | 8 | 21 | 13 | 6 | | |
| Ki67 | | | | | 0.074 | 0.272 |
| <15% | 12 | 31 | 29 | 21 | | |
| ≥15% | 25 | 39 | 43 | 19 | | |
| WWOX | | | | | −0.145 | 0.128 |
| — | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | | |
| + | 31 | 62 | 65 | 32 | | |
| Histological grades | | | | | 0.077 | 0.260 |
| I | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9 | | |
| II | 26 | 43 | 53 | 28 | | |
| III | 9 | 26 | 9 | 3 | | |
| PTNM | | | | | 0.158 | 0.020 * |
| 0~I | 5 | 9 | 25 | 11 | | |
| II | 21 | 34 | 38 | 21 | | |
| III | 11 | 27 | 9 | 8 | | |
| Axillary lymph node metastasis | | | | | 0.205 | 0.002* |
| Yes | 23 | 48 | 22 | 18 | | |
| No | 14 | 22 | 50 | 22 | ||
Note: *, P < 0.05.
Analysis of the correlation between the WWOX results and clinicopathological parameters in the young groups and old groups
| | — | + | — | + | | |
| ER | | | | | 0.118 | 0.080 |
| — | 2 | 34 | 5 | 26 | | |
| + | 12 | 59 | 10 | 71 | | |
| PR | | | | | 0.113 | 0.094 |
| — | 6 | 43 | 11 | 56 | | |
| + | 8 | 50 | 4 | 41 | | |
| C-erbB2 | | | | | 0.033 | 0.629 |
| — | 11 | 67 | 14 | 79 | | |
| + | 3 | 26 | 1 | 18 | | |
| Ki67 | | | | | 0.010 | 0.987 |
| <15% | 6 | 37 | 11 | 4 | | |
| ≥15% | 8 | 56 | 39 | 58 | | |
| Histological grades | | | | | 0.016 | 0.819 |
| I | 1 | 2 | 4 | 15 | | |
| II | 11 | 58 | 11 | 70 | | |
| III | 2 | 33 | 0 | 12 | | |
| PTNM | | | | | −0.085 | 0.207 |
| 0~I | 1 | 13 | 3 | 33 | | |
| II | 8 | 47 | 10 | 49 | | |
| III | 5 | 33 | 2 | 15 | | |
| Axillary lymph node metastasis | | | | | 0.099 | 0.144 |
| Yes | 12 | 59 | 8 | 32 | | |
| No | 2 | 34 | 7 | 65 | ||
Figure 3A The PCR product of exon 2 of the BRCA1 gene (259 bp). B The PCR product of exon 20 of the BRCA1 gene (401 bp).
Figure 4A The partial DNA sequencing results of exon 2 of BRCA1 gene of patient 6. B The partial DNA sequencing results of exon 20 of BRCA1 gene of patient 6.