Literature DB >> 23275683

Model Averaging Methods for Weight Trimming in Generalized Linear Regression Models.

Michael R Elliott1.   

Abstract

In sample surveys where units have unequal probabilities of inclusion, associations between the inclusion probability and the statistic of interest can induce bias in unweighted estimates. This is true even in regression models, where the estimates of the population slope may be biased if the underlying mean model is misspecified or the sampling is nonignorable. Weights equal to the inverse of the probability of inclusion are often used to counteract this bias. Highly disproportional sample designs have highly variable weights; weight trimming reduces large weights to a maximum value, reducing variability but introducing bias. Most standard approaches are ad hoc in that they do not use the data to optimize bias-variance trade-offs. This article uses Bayesian model averaging to create "data driven" weight trimming estimators. We extend previous results for linear regression models (Elliott 2008) to generalized linear regression models, developing robust models that approximate fully-weighted estimators when bias correction is of greatest importance, and approximate unweighted estimators when variance reduction is critical.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 23275683      PMCID: PMC3530169     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Off Stat        ISSN: 0282-423X            Impact factor:   0.920


  3 in total

1.  Partners for child passenger safety: a unique child-specific crash surveillance system.

Authors:  D R Durbin; E Bhatia; J H Holmes; K N Shaw; J V Werner; W Sorenson; F K Winston
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2001-05

2.  Risk of injury to child passengers in compact extended-cab pickup trucks.

Authors:  Flaura K Winston; Michael J Kallan; Michael R Elliott; Rajiv A Menon; Dennis R Durbin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Model Averaging Methods for Weight Trimming.

Authors:  Michael R Elliott
Journal:  J Off Stat       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 0.920

  3 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Propensity score methods for observational studies with clustered data: A review.

Authors:  Ting-Hsuan Chang; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.497

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.