Literature DB >> 23275276

Induction docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil precludes definitive chemoradiotherapy in a substantial proportion of patients with head and neck cancer in a low socioeconomic status population.

Jimmy J Caudell1, Robert D Hamilton, Kristen J Otto, Richard L Jennelle, Karen T Pitman, Srinivasan Vijayakumar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this retrospective study we evaluate the tolerability and outcomes after induction chemotherapy for patients with predominately low socioeconomic status (SES) with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC).
METHODS: One hundred eighteen patients with LAHNC of the hypopharynx, larynx, oral cavity, or oropharynx began curative intent therapy with induction cisplatin (75 or 100 mg/m), docetaxel (75 mg/m), and 5-fluorouracil (750 mg/m×5 d or 1000 mg/m×4 d; continuous infusion) every 3 weeks (DPF) for a planned 2 to 3 cycles. All patients were to receive curative radiotherapy with concurrent systemic therapy. Associations were tested using χ test, and survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Most patients (75.4%) were of low SES. Induction DPF was delivered for a median of 2 cycles (range, 1 to 3) and 14% of the patients (n=17) died during induction DPF. After DPF, 38.2% of patients were unable to complete or receive planned definitive therapy. Overall 15.3% of patients died during therapy, and mortality was associated with a Karnofsky performance status <80 (P=0.04). At 2 years the locoregional control was 52.7%, whereas the distant metastases free rate was 72.6%, and the overall survival rate was 34.1%. Low SES patients were less likely to achieve locoregional control (P=0.05) or survive (P=0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: In this population of LAHNC patients of low SES with a high tumor burden and poor performance status, use of induction DPF was associated with 15.3% mortality during therapy and precluded 38.2% of patients from initiating or completing planned definitive therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23275276     DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31827a7cff

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  4 in total

1.  Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy as definitive, first line treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A retrospective single center analysis.

Authors:  P Balermpas; C Bauer; I Fraunholz; A Ottinger; J Wagenblast; T Stöver; O Seitz; E Fokas; C Rödel; C Weiss
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the veteran population: Association with traditional carcinogen exposure and poor clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Vlad C Sandulache; John Hamblin; Syeling Lai; Todd Pezzi; Heath D Skinner; Numan A Khan; Shayan M Dioun; Christine Hartman; Jennifer Kramer; Elizabeth Chiao; Xiaodong Zhou; Jose P Zevallos
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancers: Myth or reality?

Authors:  Vijay M Patil; Vanita Noronha; Amit Joshi; Saurabh Zanwar; Anant Ramaswamy; Supreeta Arya; Abhishek Mahajan; Atanu Bhattacharjee; Kumar Prabhash
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

4.  Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with paclitaxel plus carboplatin and oral metronomic chemotherapy (OMCT) in patients with technically unresectable oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

Authors:  Lakhan Kashyap; Vijay Patil; Vanita Noronha; Amit Joshi; Nandini Menon; Kunal Jobanputra; Saswata Saha; Pankaj Chaturvedi; Shripad D Banavali; Kumar Prabhash
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-12-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.