Literature DB >> 23275146

Informed consent for HPV vaccination: a relational approach.

Maria Gottvall1, Tanja Tydén, Margareta Larsson, Christina Stenhammar, Anna T Höglund.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the relational aspects of the consent process for HPV vaccination as experienced by school nurses, based on the assumption that individuals have interests related to persons close to them, which is not necessarily to be apprehended as a restriction of autonomy; rather as a voluntary and emotionally preferred involvement of their close ones. Thirty Swedish school nurses were interviewed in five focus groups, before the school based vaccination program had started in Sweden. The empirical results were discussed in light of theories on relational autonomy. The school nurses were convinced that parental consent was needed for HPV vaccination of 11-year-old girls, but problems identified were the difficulty to judge when a young person is to be regarded as autonomous and what to do when children and parents do not agree on the decision. A solution suggested was that obtaining informed consent in school nursing is to be seen as a deliberative process, including the child, the parents and the nurse. The nurses described how they were willing strive for a dialogue with the parents and negotiate with them in the consent process. Seeing autonomy as relational might allow for a more dialogical approach towards how consent is obtained in school based vaccination programs. Through such an approach, conflicts of interests can be made visible and become possible to deal with in a negotiating dialogue. If the school nurses do not focus exclusively on accepting the individual parent's choice, but strive to engage in a process of communication and deliberation, the autonomy of the child might increase and power inequalities might be reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 23275146     DOI: 10.1007/s10728-012-0237-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  21 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of a moral distress scale.

Authors:  M C Corley; R K Elswick; M Gorman; T Clor
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Empirical ethics, context-sensitivity, and contextualism.

Authors:  Albert W Musschenga
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2005-10

3.  Legal basis of consent for health care and vaccination for adolescents.

Authors:  Abigail English; Frederic E Shaw; Mary M McCauley; Daniel B Fishbein
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Challenges and opportunities of a new HPV immunization program perceptions among Swedish school nurses.

Authors:  Maria Gottvall; Tanja Tydén; Margareta Larsson; Christina Stenhammar; Anna T Höglund
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.

Authors:  J Kitzinger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-29

6.  What constitutes consent when parents and daughters have different views about having the HPV vaccine: qualitative interviews with stakeholders.

Authors:  Fiona Wood; Lucy Morris; Myfanwy Davies; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 7.  Epidemiology and natural history of human papillomavirus infections and type-specific implications in cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  F Xavier Bosch; Ann N Burchell; Mark Schiffman; Anna R Giuliano; Silvia de Sanjose; Laia Bruni; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Susanne Kruger Kjaer; Nubia Muñoz
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family's role in medical decision-making.

Authors:  Anita Ho
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2008-03

9.  School nurses' experiences of delivering the UK HPV vaccination programme in its first year.

Authors:  Shona Hilton; Kate Hunt; Helen Bedford; Mark Petticrew
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  A qualitative study to assess school nurses' views on vaccinating 12-13 year old school girls against human papillomavirus without parental consent.

Authors:  Rebecca Stretch; Rosemary McCann; Stephen A Roberts; Peter Elton; David Baxter; Loretta Brabin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  6 in total

1.  Barriers and enablers to adolescent self-consent for vaccination: A mixed-methods evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Harriet Fisher; Sarah Harding; Matthew Hickman; John Macleod; Suzanne Audrey
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Systematic review searches must be systematic, comprehensive, and transparent: a critique of Perman et al.

Authors:  Devon Greyson; Ellen Rafferty; Linda Slater; Noni MacDonald; Julie A Bettinger; Ève Dubé; Shannon E MacDonald
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The Model of "Informed Refusal" for Vaccination: How to Fight against Anti-Vaccinationist Misinformation without Disregarding the Principle of Self-Determination.

Authors:  Stefano D'Errico; Emanuela Turillazzi; Martina Zanon; Rocco Valerio Viola; Paola Frati; Vittorio Fineschi
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-01

4.  The needle pricking and two modes of 'doing good' in the Swedish school-based human papillomavirus vaccination programme.

Authors:  Lisa Lindén; Ylva Odenbring
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2022-08-06

5.  Social mobilisation, consent and acceptability: a review of human papillomavirus vaccination procedures in low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Severin Kabakama; Katherine E Gallagher; Natasha Howard; Sandra Mounier-Jack; Helen E D Burchett; Ulla K Griffiths; Marta Feletto; D Scott LaMontagne; Deborah Watson-Jones
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care.

Authors:  Amal Matar; Anna T Höglund; Pär Segerdahl; Ulrik Kihlbom
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.