| Literature DB >> 23274903 |
Claudia P Coomans1, Sjoerd A A van den Berg, Eliane A Lucassen, Thijs Houben, Amanda C M Pronk, Rianne D van der Spek, Andries Kalsbeek, Nienke R Biermasz, Ko Willems van Dijk, Johannes A Romijn, Johanna H Meijer.
Abstract
Disturbances in the circadian system are associated with the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Here, we studied the direct contribution of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the central pacemaker in the circadian system, in the development of insulin resistance. Exclusive bilateral SCN lesions in male C57Bl/6J mice, as verified by immunochemistry, showed a small but significant increase in body weight (+17%), which was accounted for by an increase in fat mass. In contrast, mice with collateral damage to the ventromedial hypothalamus and paraventricular nucleus showed severe obesity and insulin resistance. Mice with exclusive SCN ablation revealed a loss of circadian rhythm in activity, oxygen consumption, and food intake. Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp analysis 8 weeks after lesioning showed that the glucose infusion rate was significantly lower in SCN lesioned mice compared with sham-operated mice (-63%). Although insulin potently inhibited endogenous glucose production (-84%), this was greatly reduced in SCN lesioned mice (-7%), indicating severe hepatic insulin resistance. Our data show that SCN malfunctioning plays an important role in the disturbance of energy balance and suggest that an absence of central clock activity, in a genetically intact animal, may lead to the development of insulin resistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23274903 PMCID: PMC3609590 DOI: 10.2337/db12-0507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes ISSN: 0012-1797 Impact factor: 9.461
FIG. 1.Representative double-plotted actogram analyses of sham-operated (A) and SCN lesioned (B) mice under constant dark conditions. Each line of the double-plotted actograms represents 48 h.
FIG. 2.Body mass and composition of sham (white bars) and SCN lesioned (black bars) mice at the time of the hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp. Total body mass, lean body mass, and fat mass were determined. Data are represented as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01.
FIG. 3.Indirect calorimetry and metabolic cage analysis of sham and SCN lesioned (SCNx) mice: oxygen consumption (A), activity (B), and energy intake (C). White bars represent the average value during the day and black bars represent the average value during the night. Data are represented as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01.
Body mass and hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp parameters of sham and suprachiasmatic nucleus lesioned (SCNx) mice
FIG. 4.Hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp analysis of sham (white) and SCN lesioned (SCNx, black) mice. Line graphs represent the plasma glucose levels (A) and GIR (B) during the hyperinsulinemic period of the clamp. Bar graph represents the clamped steady-state GIR (C). Data are represented as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01.
FIG. 5.Glucose Rd (A) and EGP (B) in basal period (white bars) and hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp period (black bars) of sham and SCN lesioned (SCNx) mice. Data are represented as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01.
FIG. 6.Body mass and composition (A) and hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp analysis (B) of sham (white bars) and SCN lesioned (SCNx) mice with collateral damage (striped bars): unilateral PVN, bilateral PVN, and PVN plus VMH. Data are represented as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01.