Literature DB >> 23274659

In vivo activities of ceftolozane, a new cephalosporin, with and without tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae, including strains with extended-spectrum β-lactamases, in the thighs of neutropenic mice.

W A Craig1, D R Andes.   

Abstract

Ceftolozane is a new cephalosporin with potent activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae. A neutropenic murine thigh infection model was used to determine which pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index and magnitude drives the efficacy of ceftolozane with Gram-negative bacilli, to compare the rates of in vivo killing of P. aeruginosa by ceftolozane and ceftazidime, and to determine the impact of different ratios of ceftolozane plus tazobactam on Enterobacteriaceae containing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). Neutropenic mice had 10(6.2-7.1) CFU/thigh when treated with ceftolozane for 24 h with (i) various doses (3.12 to 1,600 mg/kg) and dosage intervals (3, 6, 12, and 24 h) against two Enterobacteriaceae strains, (ii) 0.39 to 800 mg/kg every 6 h for four Enterobacteriaceae and four P. aeruginosa strains, and (iii) 400 or 800 mg/kg with 2:1. 4:1, and 8:1 ratios of tazobactam against five Enterobacteriaceae strains with ESBLs. The pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane at 25, 100, and 400 mg/kg were linear with peak/dose values of 1.0 to 1.4 and half-lives of 12 to 14 min. T>MIC was the primary index driving efficacy. For stasis (1 log kill), T>MIC was 26.3% ± 2.1% (31.6% ± 1.6%) for wild-type Enterobacteriaceae, 31.1% ± 4.9% (34.8% ± 4.4%) for Enterobacteriaceae with ESBLs, and 24.0% ± 3.3% (31.5% ± 3.9%) for P. aeruginosa. At 200 mg/kg every 3 h, the rate of in vivo killing of P. aeruginosa was faster with ceftolozane than with ceftazidime (-0.34 to -0.41 log10 CFU/thigh/h versus -0.21 to -0.24 log10 CFU/thigh/h). The 2:1 ratio of ceftolozane with tazobactam was the most potent combination studied. The T>MIC required for ceftolozane is less than with other cephalosporins and may be due to more rapid killing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23274659      PMCID: PMC3623364          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01590-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  23 in total

Review 1.  Animal model pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: a critical review.

Authors:  D Andes; W A Craig
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.283

2.  Stability of FR264205 against AmpC beta-lactamase of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Shinobu Takeda; Yoshikazu Ishii; Kazuo Hatano; Kazuhiro Tateda; Keizo Yamaguchi
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 5.283

3.  In vitro and in vivo activities of a new cephalosporin, FR264205, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Shinobu Takeda; Toru Nakai; Yoshimi Wakai; Fumiaki Ikeda; Kazuo Hatano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacodynamics of piperacillin alone and in combination with tazobactam against piperacillin-resistant and -susceptible organisms in an in vitro model of infection.

Authors:  A H Strayer; D H Gilbert; P Pivarnik; A A Medeiros; S H Zinner; M N Dudley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of intravenous ceftolozane-tazobactam in healthy adult subjects following single and multiple ascending doses.

Authors:  Benjamin Miller; Ellie Hershberger; David Benziger; Mymy Trinh; Ian Friedland
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men.

Authors:  W A Craig
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Concentration-effect relationship of ceftazidime explains why the time above the MIC is 40 percent for a static effect in vivo.

Authors:  Johan W Mouton; Nieko Punt; Alexander A Vinks
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Correlation between in vitro and in vivo activity of antimicrobial agents against gram-negative bacilli in a murine infection model.

Authors:  B Fantin; J Leggett; S Ebert; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Interrelationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in determining dosage regimens for broad-spectrum cephalosporins.

Authors:  W A Craig
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.803

10.  Comparative antibiotic dose-effect relations at several dosing intervals in murine pneumonitis and thigh-infection models.

Authors:  J E Leggett; B Fantin; S Ebert; K Totsuka; B Vogelman; W Calame; H Mattie; W A Craig
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  53 in total

1.  Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Population Pharmacokinetics and Dose Selection for Further Clinical Evaluation in Pediatric Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract or Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections.

Authors:  Kajal B Larson; Yogesh T Patel; Susan Willavize; John S Bradley; Elizabeth G Rhee; Luzelena Caro; Matthew L Rizk
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime Combined with Tazobactam against Clinically Relevant Enterobacteriaceae in a Neutropenic Mouse Thigh Model.

Authors:  Maria J Melchers; Anita C van Mil; Claudia Lagarde; Jan den Hartigh; Johan W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  An overview of cephalosporin antibiotics as emerging contaminants: a serious environmental concern.

Authors:  Nilanjana Das; Jagannathan Madhavan; Adikesavan Selvi; Devlina Das
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, phase II trial to assess the safety and efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam plus metronidazole compared with meropenem in adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Christopher Lucasti; Ellie Hershberger; Benjamin Miller; Sara Yankelev; Judith Steenbergen; Ian Friedland; Joseph Solomkin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  What we may expect from novel antibacterial agents in the pipeline with respect to resistance and pharmacodynamic principles.

Authors:  Karen Bush; Malcolm G P Page
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Relationship between ceftolozane-tazobactam exposure and selection for Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance in a hollow-fiber infection model.

Authors:  Brian D VanScoy; Rodrigo E Mendes; Mariana Castanheira; Jennifer McCauley; Sujata M Bhavnani; Ronald N Jones; Lawrence V Friedrich; Judith N Steenbergen; Paul G Ambrose
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Pharmacological basis of β-lactamase inhibitor therapeutics: tazobactam in combination with Ceftolozane.

Authors:  Brian Vanscoy; Rodrigo E Mendes; Jennifer McCauley; Sujata M Bhavnani; Catharine C Bulik; Olanrewaju O Okusanya; Alan Forrest; Ronald N Jones; Lawrence V Friedrich; Judith N Steenbergen; Paul G Ambrose
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In Vitro and In Vivo Activities of OP0595, a New Diazabicyclooctane, against CTX-M-15-Positive Escherichia coli and KPC-Positive Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  Akihiro Morinaka; Yuko Tsutsumi; Keiko Yamada; Yoshihiro Takayama; Shiro Sakakibara; Toshihiko Takata; Takao Abe; Takeshi Furuuchi; Seiichi Inamura; Yoshiaki Sakamaki; Nakako Tsujii; Takashi Ida
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Impact of MIC range for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus pneumoniae on the ceftolozane in vivo pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target.

Authors:  A J Lepak; A Reda; K Marchillo; J Van Hecker; W A Craig; D Andes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Structural Insights Lead to a Negamycin Analogue with Improved Antimicrobial Activity against Gram-Negative Pathogens.

Authors:  David C McKinney; Gregory S Basarab; Alexis I Cocozaki; Melinda A Foulk; Matthew D Miller; Anatoly M Ruvinsky; Clay W Scott; Kumar Thakur; Liang Zhao; Ed T Buurman; Sridhar Narayan
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 4.345

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.