Literature DB >> 23274246

Quantitative study of controlled substance bedside wasting, disposal and evaluation of potential ecologic effects.

Russell F Mankes1, Charles D Silver.   

Abstract

Drugs in wastewater arise from many sources. For health care, these include excretion and direct disposal (bedside wasting). The present study reports on the dispensing and wasting of 15 controlled substances (CS) at two health care facilities in Albany, NY over a nearly two year period. The study considered measures of ecotoxicity, drug metabolism, excretion and disposal of these CS. Potential alternatives to flushing of CS into wastewaters from healthcare facilities are discussed. Drug medication and waste collection records (12,345) included: numbers of drugs dispensed, returned and wasted. Overall, 8528 g of 15 CS were wasted. Three (midazolam, acetaminophen-codeine and fentanyl) accounted for 87.5% of the total wasted. Wasting varied by hospital, 14 CS at the academic medical center hospital and 8 at the surgical care center were wasted. Liquids were more frequently wasted than tablets or pills. Some combination drugs (acetaminophen (APAP)-codeine) were frequently (50% of drug dispensed) wasted while others were less wasted (APAP-hydrocodone-6.3%; APAP-oxycodone-1.3%). The 8 CS judged more hazardous to aquatic life were: APAP-codeine, APAP-hydrocodone, APAP-oxycodone, alprazolam, diazepam, fentanyl, midazolam, and testosterone. Ketamine, morphine, oxycodone and zolpidem were of lesser acute toxicity based on available LC50 values. These CS might provide a therapeutically equivalent alternative to the more environmentally harmful drugs. In health care facilities, professionals dispose of CS by bedside wasting into water or other receptacles. This can be avoided by returning CS to the hospital's pharmacy department, thence to a licensed distributor. Study of this process of drug wasting can identify opportunities for process improvements. We found 3 CS (APAP-codeine, midazolam and testosterone) where ½ to 1/3 of the drug was wasted and 5 others with 30 to 13% wasted. Knowledge of the adverse impacts from the release of highly toxic drugs into the environment might influence CS selection and disposal alternatives.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23274246     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Outpatient Narcotic Use After Minimally Invasive Urogynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Carolyn W Swenson; Angela S Kelley; Dee E Fenner; Mitchell B Berger
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

2.  What a Waste: Perioperative Fentanyl Wastage at a Pediatric Hospital.

Authors:  Andrew T Waberski; Jessica Cronin; Benjamin Hammer; Barbara H Braffett; Eugenie Heitmiller
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-02-09

3.  Oxidative Transformation of Controlled Substances by Manganese Dioxide.

Authors:  Webber Wei-Po Lai; Angela Yu-Chen Lin; Sheng-Yao Yang; Ching-Hua Huang
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-05-19

Review 4.  Controlled Substance Waste: Concerns, Controversies, Solutions.

Authors:  Frank Breve; Jo Ann K LeQuang; Lisa Batastini
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-24

5.  β-Glucan-Functionalized Nanoparticles Down-Modulate the Proinflammatory Response of Mononuclear Phagocytes Challenged with Candida albicans.

Authors:  Tânia Lima; Stefán B Gunnarsson; Elisabete Coelho; Dmitry V Evtuguin; Alexandra Correia; Manuel A Coimbra; Tommy Cedervall; Manuel Vilanova
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.719

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.