Literature DB >> 23274143

The transcription bubble of the RNA polymerase-promoter open complex exhibits conformational heterogeneity and millisecond-scale dynamics: implications for transcription start-site selection.

Nicole C Robb1, Thorben Cordes, Ling Chin Hwang, Kristofer Gryte, Diego Duchi, Timothy D Craggs, Yusdi Santoso, Shimon Weiss, Richard H Ebright, Achillefs N Kapanidis.   

Abstract

Bacterial transcription is initiated after RNA polymerase (RNAP) binds to promoter DNA, melts ~14 bp around the transcription start site and forms a single-stranded "transcription bubble" within a catalytically active RNAP-DNA open complex (RP(o)). There is significant flexibility in the transcription start site, which causes variable spacing between the promoter elements and the start site; this in turn causes differences in the length and sequence at the 5' end of RNA transcripts and can be important for gene regulation. The start-site variability also implies the presence of some flexibility in the positioning of the DNA relative to the RNAP active site in RP(o). The flexibility may occur in the positioning of the transcription bubble prior to RNA synthesis and may reflect bubble expansion ("scrunching") or bubble contraction ("unscrunching"). Here, we assess the presence of dynamic flexibility in RP(o) with single-molecule FRET (Förster resonance energy transfer). We obtain experimental evidence for dynamic flexibility in RP(o) using different FRET rulers and labeling positions. An analysis of FRET distributions of RP(o) using burst variance analysis reveals conformational fluctuations in RP(o) in the millisecond timescale. Further experiments using subsets of nucleotides and DNA mutations allowed us to reprogram the transcription start sites, in a way that can be described by repositioning of the single-stranded transcription bubble relative to the RNAP active site within RP(o). Our study marks the first experimental observation of conformational dynamics in the transcription bubble of RP(o) and indicates that DNA dynamics within the bubble affect the search for transcription start sites.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23274143      PMCID: PMC3783996          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  46 in total

1.  Retention of transcription initiation factor sigma70 in transcription elongation: single-molecule analysis.

Authors:  Achillefs N Kapanidis; Emmanuel Margeat; Ted A Laurence; Sören Doose; Sam On Ho; Jayanta Mukhopadhyay; Ekaterine Kortkhonjia; Vladimir Mekler; Richard H Ebright; Shimon Weiss
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Alternating-laser excitation of single molecules.

Authors:  Achillefs N Kapanidis; Ted A Laurence; Nam Ki Lee; Emmanuel Margeat; Xiangxu Kong; Shimon Weiss
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 22.384

3.  Shot-noise limited single-molecule FRET histograms: comparison between theory and experiments.

Authors:  Eyal Nir; Xavier Michalet; Kambiz M Hamadani; Ted A Laurence; Daniel Neuhauser; Yevgeniy Kovchegov; Shimon Weiss
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Transcriptional slippage during the transcription initiation process at a mutant lac promoter in vivo.

Authors:  X F Xiong; W S Reznikoff
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-06-05       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Transcription against an applied force.

Authors:  H Yin; M D Wang; K Svoboda; R Landick; S M Block; J Gelles
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Molecular genetics of the RNA polymerase II general transcriptional machinery.

Authors:  M Hampsey
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  Quantitative analysis of in vivo initiator selection by yeast RNA polymerase II supports a scanning model.

Authors:  Jason N Kuehner; David A Brow
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  A 5'-terminal stem-loop structure can stabilize mRNA in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S A Emory; P Bouvet; J G Belasco
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Start site selection at lacUV5 promoter affected by the sequence context around the initiation sites.

Authors:  W Jeong; C Kang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Abortive initiation and productive initiation by RNA polymerase involve DNA scrunching.

Authors:  Andrey Revyakin; Chenyu Liu; Richard H Ebright; Terence R Strick
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  How to switch the motor on: RNA polymerase initiation steps at the single-molecule level.

Authors:  M Marchetti; A Malinowska; I Heller; G J L Wuite
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Redefining fundamental concepts of transcription initiation in bacteria.

Authors:  Citlalli Mejía-Almonte; Stephen J W Busby; Joseph T Wade; Jacques van Helden; Adam P Arkin; Gary D Stormo; Karen Eilbeck; Bernhard O Palsson; James E Galagan; Julio Collado-Vides
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Metalloregulator CueR biases RNA polymerase's kinetic sampling of dead-end or open complex to repress or activate transcription.

Authors:  Danya J Martell; Chandra P Joshi; Ahmed Gaballa; Ace George Santiago; Tai-Yen Chen; Won Jung; John D Helmann; Peng Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Interactions between RNA polymerase and the core recognition element are a determinant of transcription start site selection.

Authors:  Irina O Vvedenskaya; Hanif Vahedian-Movahed; Yuanchao Zhang; Deanne M Taylor; Richard H Ebright; Bryce E Nickels
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Characterizing highly dynamic conformational states: The transcription bubble in RNAP-promoter open complex as an example.

Authors:  Eitan Lerner; Antonino Ingargiola; Shimon Weiss
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Massively Systematic Transcript End Readout, "MASTER": Transcription Start Site Selection, Transcriptional Slippage, and Transcript Yields.

Authors:  Irina O Vvedenskaya; Yuanchao Zhang; Seth R Goldman; Anna Valenti; Valeria Visone; Deanne M Taylor; Richard H Ebright; Bryce E Nickels
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 7.  RNA polymerase: in search of promoters.

Authors:  Andrey Feklistov
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Open complex scrunching before nucleotide addition accounts for the unusual transcription start site of E. coli ribosomal RNA promoters.

Authors:  Jared T Winkelman; Pete Chandrangsu; Wilma Ross; Richard L Gourse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The smfBox is an open-source platform for single-molecule FRET.

Authors:  Benjamin Ambrose; James M Baxter; John Cully; Matthew Willmott; Elliot M Steele; Benji C Bateman; Marisa L Martin-Fernandez; Ashley Cadby; Jonathan Shewring; Marleen Aaldering; Timothy D Craggs
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Multiplexed protein-DNA cross-linking: Scrunching in transcription start site selection.

Authors:  Jared T Winkelman; Irina O Vvedenskaya; Yuanchao Zhang; Yu Zhang; Jeremy G Bird; Deanne M Taylor; Richard L Gourse; Richard H Ebright; Bryce E Nickels
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.