OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to confirm the hypothesis that pre-operative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to distinguish between "low grade" and "high grade" tumours in paediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: ADC values were retrospectively evaluated in thirty-six paediatric brain tumours. Twenty-one children with low grade brain tumours (12 WHO I astrocytomas, 1 giant cell tumour, 1 pilomyxoid astrocytoma, 4 WHO II astrocytomas, 2 craniopharyngiomas and 1 ganglioglioma) and 15 children with high grade brain tumours (6 medulloblastomas, 3 WHO III ependymomas, 1 PNET, 1 malignant rhabdoid tumour, 1 malignant germ cell tumour, 1 WHO III astrocytoma, 1 WHO IV astrocytoma, 1 rhabdomyosarcoma metastasis) were included in this study. Minimum and mean ADC values were compared between low grade and high grade tumours and cut-off values were evaluated. RESULTS: The cut-off values to differentiate low and high grade paediatric brain tumours were 0.7 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s and 1.0 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s for minimum ADC and average ADC values respectively. All but one high grade infratentorial ependymoma showed significantly lower ADC values than low grade brain tumours in children. CONCLUSION: Combining the information obtained from conventional MR imaging with the ADC values may increase the accuracy of pre-operative differentiation between low grade and high grade paediatric tumours. Cut-off values can help to discern low from high grade tumours. However, it has to be considered that there is a substantial overlap between tumour types previously described in the literature.
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to confirm the hypothesis that pre-operative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to distinguish between "low grade" and "high grade" tumours in paediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: ADC values were retrospectively evaluated in thirty-six paediatric brain tumours. Twenty-one children with low grade brain tumours (12 WHO I astrocytomas, 1 giant cell tumour, 1 pilomyxoid astrocytoma, 4 WHO II astrocytomas, 2 craniopharyngiomas and 1 ganglioglioma) and 15 children with high grade brain tumours (6 medulloblastomas, 3 WHO III ependymomas, 1 PNET, 1 malignant rhabdoid tumour, 1 malignant germ cell tumour, 1 WHO III astrocytoma, 1 WHO IV astrocytoma, 1 rhabdomyosarcoma metastasis) were included in this study. Minimum and mean ADC values were compared between low grade and high grade tumours and cut-off values were evaluated. RESULTS: The cut-off values to differentiate low and high grade paediatric brain tumours were 0.7 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s and 1.0 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s for minimum ADC and average ADC values respectively. All but one high grade infratentorial ependymoma showed significantly lower ADC values than low grade brain tumours in children. CONCLUSION: Combining the information obtained from conventional MR imaging with the ADC values may increase the accuracy of pre-operative differentiation between low grade and high grade paediatric tumours. Cut-off values can help to discern low from high grade tumours. However, it has to be considered that there is a substantial overlap between tumour types previously described in the literature.
Authors: Yi Sui; He Wang; Guanzhong Liu; Frederick W Damen; Christian Wanamaker; Yuhua Li; Xiaohong Joe Zhou Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lei Qin; Xiang Li; Amanda Stroiney; Jinrong Qu; Jeffrey Helgager; David A Reardon; Geoffrey S Young Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Alexander Rau; Elias Kellner; Niels A Foit; Niklas Lützen; Dieter H Heiland; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Marco Reisert; Valerij G Kiselev; Marco Prinz; Horst Urbach; Irina Mader Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2018-11-21
Authors: Delilah Burrowes; Jason R Fangusaro; Paige C Nelson; Bin Zhang; Nitin R Wadhwani; Michael J Rozenfeld; Jie Deng Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-07-08 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: G Orman; S Mohammed; H D B Tran; F Y Lin; A Meoded; N Desai; T A G M Huisman; S F Kralik Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 3.825