Literature DB >> 2327362

Acute changes in pacing threshold and R- or P-wave amplitude during permanent pacemaker implantation.

M de Buitleir1, W H Kou, S Schmaltz, F Morady.   

Abstract

This study examines the changes in pacing threshold and R- or P-wave amplitude during the first 30 minutes after implantation of tined and screw-in leads. The leads examined were those of 1 manufacturer (Medtronic) and consisted of 3 ventricular pacing leads (model numbers 6957 unipolar screw-in [11 patients], 6961 unipolar tined [12 patients] and 6962 bipolar tined [7 patients]) and 1 atrial lead (model number 6957J unipolar screw-in [10 patients]). After optimal lead position was obtained fluoroscopically in the right ventricular apex or right atrium, the pacing threshold and R- or P-wave amplitudes were measured at 5-minute intervals for 30 minutes. The acute ventricular pacing threshold with the screw-in lead was significantly higher than with the tined lead (0.84 +/- 0.17 vs 0.58 +/- 0.15 volts; p less than 0.001). There was a significant (p less than 0.001) acute decrease in the ventricular pacing threshold with both lead types, with the maximum decrease occurring 5 minutes after lead implantation. There was a significant acute increase in R-wave size with the ventricular screw-in lead that peaked 20 minutes after lead implantation (11.9 +/- 3.0 to 14.7 +/- 4.1 mV; p less than 0.001). The atrial screw-in lead behaved in a manner identical to its counterpart in the ventricle. In conclusion, there are acute changes in the pacing threshold and R- or P-wave amplitude obtained with tined and screw-in pacing leads.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2327362     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)91003-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Stability of pacing indices and need for pacing in cardiac transplant patients over 1 year of follow-up.

Authors:  Talha A Farid; Mohamed A Omer; Kensey Gosch; Ashley Moser; Bethany Austin; Anthony Magalski; Alan P Wimmer
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Early performance of a miniaturized leadless cardiac pacemaker: the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study.

Authors:  Philippe Ritter; Gabor Z Duray; Clemens Steinwender; Kyoko Soejima; Razali Omar; Lluís Mont; Lucas V A Boersma; Reinoud E Knops; Larry Chinitz; Shu Zhang; Calambur Narasimhan; John Hummel; Michael Lloyd; Timothy Alexander Simmers; Andrew Voigt; Verla Laager; Kurt Stromberg; Matthew D Bonner; Todd J Sheldon; Dwight Reynolds
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Nanostim leadless pacemaker system: A longer waiting period after active fixation may reduce unnecessary repositioning.

Authors:  Hiro Kawata; Pranav M Patel; Rajesh Banker
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2017-12-16

4.  Time course of current of injury is related to acute stability of active-fixation pacing leads in rabbits.

Authors:  Shalaimaiti Shali; Alimujiang Wushou; Entao Liu; Lin Jia; Ruiming Yao; Yangang Su; Junbo Ge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.