Literature DB >> 23273565

Results of revision total hip arthroplasty with modular, titanium-tapered femoral stems in severe proximal metaphyseal and diaphyseal bone loss.

Brian T Palumbo1, Kurt L Morrison, Adam S Baumgarten, Mathew I Stein, George J Haidukewych, Thomas L Bernasek.   

Abstract

Evidence supporting modular, tapered stems for severe proximal metaphyseal and diaphyseal bone loss is limited. We report our clinical experience with its use for severely deficient femurs. Of 211 revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs), 18 tapered, modular titanium stems were implanted in Paprosky type III and IV femurs. Clinical data were reviewed for function, stability, structural failure and revision surgery at a mean follow-up of 4.5years. The overall survival rate was 94%. One required revision due to infection and subsidence. The mean subsidence was 3.5mm and the mean pre- and post-operative Harris Hip score was 56 and 79, respectively. In surviving cases, patients achieved satisfactory function and there were no mechanical failures. Modular, tapered stems demonstrated acceptable outcomes for management of severe proximal metaphyseal and diaphyseal defects.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23273565     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of two tapered fluted modular titanium (TFMT) stems used in revision hip arthroplasty from a single center.

Authors:  Rajesh Pawar; Rye Yap; Jody Blow; Mohanrao Garabadi; Mark Rowsell; Hasnat Minhas; Prasad Antapur
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-01

2.  Modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications.

Authors:  Nicholas M Brown; Matthew Tetreault; Cara A Cipriano; Craig J Della Valle; Wayne Paprosky; Scott Sporer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Early outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with a modern modular femoral revision stem in 65 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Christopher E Pelt; Marissa L Stagg; Christin Van Dine; Mike B Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Jeremy M Gililland
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2018-11-17

4.  Medium Term Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Using a Modular Tapered Hip Revision Implant.

Authors:  Gihan Jayasinghe; Chris Buckle; Lucy Clare Maling; Christopher To; Chukwudubem Anibueze; Parthiban Vinayakam; Richard Slack
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-04-05

5.  Mid-term results of previously cemented hip arthroplasties revised with uncemented modular femoral components: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Tahir Mutlu Duymus; Zafer Solak; Yusuf Ozturkmen; Ibrahim Azboy; Serhat Mutlu; Mustafa Caniklioglu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 6.  Outcomes of dual modular cementless femoral stems in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali Ghoz; Matthew L Broadhead; John Morley; Shawn Tavares; David McDonald
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2014-03-31

Review 7.  Modular Stems: Advantages and Current Role in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chan-Woo Park; Seung-Jae Lim; Youn-Soo Park
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2018-09-04

8.  Fracture risk of tapered modular revision stems: a failure analysis.

Authors:  Kilian Rueckl; Peter K Sculco; Jonathan Berliner; Michael B Cross; Chelsea Koch; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-12-21

9.  Reconstruction of Proximal Metaphyseal Femoral Defects Using Trabecular Metal Augments in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sebastian Simon; Bernhard J H Frank; Alexander Aichmair; Martin Dominkus; Jochen G Hofstaetter
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-04-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.