Literature DB >> 23273384

Cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: underestimated surgery-associated complications?

Dorothee Wachter1, Kim Reineke, Timo Behm, Veit Rohde.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DC) and duroplasty after malignant brain infarction or traumatic brain injury is a common surgical procedure. Usually, preserved bone flaps are being reimplanted after resolution of brain swelling. Alloplast cranioplasties are seldom directly implanted due to the risk of wound healing disorders. While numerous studies deal with DC, little is known about the encountered problems of bone flap reimplantation. Thus, aim of the study was to identify surgery-associated complications after bone flap reimplantation.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart analysis of patients that underwent DC and subsequent bone flap reimplantation between 2001 and 2011 at our institution. We registered demographic data, initial clinical diagnosis and surgery-associated complications.
RESULTS: We identified 136 patients that underwent DC and subsequent reimplantation. Forty-one patients (30.1%) had early or late surgery-associated complications after bone flap reimplantation. Most often, bone flap resorption and postoperative wound infections were the underlying causes (73%, n=30/41). Multivariate analysis identified age (p=0.045; OR=16.30), GOS prior to cranioplasty (p=0.03; OR=2.38) and nicotine abuse as a prognostic factor for surgery-associated complications (p=0.043; OR=4.02). Furthermore, patients with early cranioplasty had a better functional outcome than patients with late cranioplasty (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Almost one-third of the patients that are operated on for bone flap reimplantation after DC suffer from surgery-associated complications. Most often, wound healing disorders as well as bone flap resorption lead to a second or even third operation with the need for artificial bone implantation. These results might raise the question, if subsequent operations can be avoided, if an artificial bone is initially chosen for cranioplasty.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone flap reimplantation; Bone flap resorption; Decompressive hemicraniectomy; Surgery-associated complications

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23273384     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  31 in total

1.  Cranioplasty Results after Application of Anti-adhesive Films (OrthoWrap™) in Traumatic Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Hosseinali Khalili; Aydin Omidvar; Fariborz Ghaffarpasand; Golnaz Yadollahikhales
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2016-01

Review 2.  The storage of skull bone flaps for autologous cranioplasty: literature review.

Authors:  Vicente Mirabet; Daniel García; Nuria Yagüe; Luis Roberto Larrea; Cristina Arbona; Carlos Botella
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 3.  Complications Associated with Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David B Kurland; Ariana Khaladj-Ghom; Jesse A Stokum; Brianna Carusillo; Jason K Karimy; Volodymyr Gerzanich; Juan Sahuquillo; J Marc Simard
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in the Age of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Michael N Diringer
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Dynamic infrared thermography (DIRT) for assessment of skin blood perfusion in cranioplasty: a proof of concept for qualitative comparison with the standard indocyanine green video angiography (ICGA).

Authors:  P Rathmann; C Chalopin; D Halama; P Giri; J Meixensberger; D Lindner
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  Problems of reconstructive cranioplasty after traumatic brain injury in children.

Authors:  Paolo Frassanito; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Luca Massimi; Simone Peraio; Massimo Caldarelli; Concezio Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  A Retrospective Study of Complications in Cranioplasty: 7-Year Period.

Authors:  S K Roy Chowdhury; Ashok Kumar; Prashant Kumar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-11-23

8.  Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Dominik Wesp; Harald Krenzlin; Dragan Jankovic; Malte Ottenhausen; Max Jägersberg; Florian Ringel; Naureen Keric
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 2.800

9.  Temporal changes in CT perfusion values before and after cranioplasty in patients without symptoms related to external decompression: a pilot study.

Authors:  Silvio Sarubbo; Francesco Latini; Stefano Ceruti; Arturo Chieregato; Christopher d'Esterre; Ting-Yim Lee; Michele Cavallo; Enrico Fainardi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Efficacy and safety of durotomy after decompressive hemicraniectomy in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  R B Moringlane; N Keric; F B Freimann; D Mielke; R Burger; D Duncker; V Rohde; K L V Eckardstein
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.