| Literature DB >> 23272823 |
Ion Anghel1, Alina Maria Holban, Alexandru Mihai Grumezescu, Ecaterina Andronescu, Anton Ficai, Alina Georgiana Anghel, Maria Maganu, Veronica Laz R, Mariana Carmen Chifiriuc.
Abstract
This paper reports a newly fabricated nanophyto-modified wound dressing with microbicidal and anti-adherence properties. Nanofluid-based magnetite doped with eugenol or limonene was used to fabricate modified wound dressings. Nanostructure coated materials were characterized by TEM, XRD, and FT-IR. For the quantitative measurement of biofilm-embedded microbial cells, a culture-based method for viable cell count was used. The optimized textile dressing samples proved to be more resistant to staphylococcal and pseudomonal colonization and biofilm formation compared to the uncoated controls. The functionalized surfaces for wound dressing seems to be a very useful tool for the prevention of wound microbial contamination on viable tissues.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23272823 PMCID: PMC3563570 DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-690
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Figure 1Schematic representation of the microbial biofilm development on the uncoated and coated wound dressings. (a) wound dressing fiber; (b) biofilm development on the surface of wound dressing fiber; (c) coated wound dressing fiber by the obtained phyto-nanofluid; (d) poorly developed microbial biofilm on the surface of the modified textile material.
Figure 2XRD pattern of the nanostructure.
Figure 3FT-IR spectrum of the nanostructure.
Figure 4HR-TEM images of the fabricated nanostructure.
Figure 5TGA diagram of fabricated nanostructures.
Figure 6The logarithmic values VCCs of cells adhered and embedded in biofilms formed on the wound dressing surface: uncoated phyto-L and E-nano-modified. Triple asterisk denotes P < 0.001; indicated samples vs. uncoated control based on one way ANOVA test.
Figure 7The logarithmic values of viable cell counts of cells. The cells adhered and embedded in biofilms and formed on the wound dressing surface: uncoated vs. nanophyto-L and E-modified. Double asterisk denotes P < 0.01; triple asterisk, P < 0.001. Indicated samples vs. uncoated control based on one way ANOVA test.