| Literature DB >> 23272730 |
Masami Fujita1, Krishna C Poudel, Thi Nhan Do, Duc Duong Bui, Van Kinh Nguyen, Kimberly Green, Thi Minh Thu Nguyen, Masaya Kato, David Jacka, Thi Thanh Thuy Cao, Thanh Long Nguyen, Masamine Jimba.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The global initiative 'Treatment 2.0' calls for expanding the evidence base of optimal HIV service delivery models to maximize HIV case detection and retention in care. However limited systematic assessment has been conducted in countries with concentrated HIV epidemic. We aimed to assess HIV service availability and service connectedness in Vietnam.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23272730 PMCID: PMC3576318 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-483
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res ISSN: 1472-6963 Impact factor: 2.655
Figure 1Framework for assessing HIV health services from the viewpoint of COPC.
Evolution of HIV health services in Vietnam
| Early 1990s | Small-scale responses initiated at the local level such as local government led needle and syringe programs and peer support activities. |
| Mid 1990s | The Ministry of Health initiated a HIV prevention campaign followed by commune health station based basic care and support for PLHIV in three provinces. |
| Early 2000s | The 100% condom use program piloted by the Ministry of Health and a number of needle and syringe programs implemented by non-governmental organizations. |
| Establishment of HIV clinical services at national hospitals followed by district level HIV outpatient clinics offering comprehensive care in Ho Chi Minh City. | |
| 2004 (and onward) | Health sector-led large scale expansion of HIV prevention, care and treatment initiated (supported by the United States, the United Kingdom, the World Bank and the Global Fund) |
| For HIV care and treatment, HIV outpatient clinics expanded based on the experiences of a number of model sites. | |
| Community- and home-based care (CHBC) expanded in different forms, such as (i) HIV outpatient clinic based; (ii) Stand-alone model run by PLHIV groups, faith-based organizations or local non-governmental organizations; (iii) Led by Women’s Union; and (iv) Commune health station based. | |
| ART expanded in administrative detention centers for IDUs and SWs, followed by in prisons. | |
| 2007 | National Plan of Action on Harm Reduction approved. It stipulated that HIV officers at provincial and district health services play a central role in mobilizing peer educators from current or former IDUs/SWs and entertainment establishment owners/managers. |
| 2008 | Under the legal framework of the Law on HIV and its decree, the national pilot Methadone Maintenance Therapy (MMT) program began in two provinces, |
(Source: [29-32], Le TG: Unpublished presentation; 2005, Fujita M and Green K: Unpublished presentation; 2010, VAAC: Unpublished report, 2010).
Strengths and constraints of HIV health service delivery in improving HIV case detection and retention in care
| - Outreach peer educators in more than half of districts [D,R] | - Less than one-third of districts offering VCT/ART at district level in middle/low HIV burden provinces [D,R] | |
| - Two-thirds of districts offering VCT/ART at district level in high HIV burden provinces [D,R] | - Lack of physically accessible VCT/ART in remote areas in high/middle burden provinces [D,R] | |
| | | |
| - Coordination mechanism between administrative detention centers and HIV outpatient clinics emerging [R] | - No coordination mechanism between districts with VCT/ART and those without [D,R] | |
| - HIV outpatient clinic ‘plus’ at district level expanded in high and middle burden provinces [D,R] | - Clinical services only in government funded HIV outpatient clinic at provincial level [D,R] | |
| - No system to monitor expansion of outpatient clinic ‘plus’ [D,R] | ||
| - Chronic care based ART case management established for IDU and non-IDU [R] | - Limited capacity to address the needs of PLHIV on ART for many years [R] | |
| - Palliative care initiated integrated with cancer care [R] | - Pre-ART care under-developed [R] | |
| - Linkage from VCT to pre-ART care under-developed [R] | ||
| - HIV testing and counseling integrated into TB and antenatal care in donor funded districts with ART/VCT in high (and middle) burden provinces [D] | - Lack of linkage for HIV-TB and HIV-MCH in non-donor funded districts without VCT/ART in middle/low burden provinces [D] | |
| - Referral system between administrative detention centers and HIV outpatient clinics being developed [R] | - HIV service register not designed to facilitate TB/HIV and PMTCT [R] | |
| - Extensive mobilization of peer educators to facilitate MARPs to access VCT [D] | - Access to HIV testing and care and treatment in advanced stage of HIV infection [D,R] | |
| - Alternative approaches to reach hidden MARPs emerging [D] | - Health workers commonly providing verbal advice only to patients for referral across different levels of health facilities [R] | |
| - CHBC models mobilizing a wide range of stakeholders [R] | - No system to monitor referral services [R] |
Remark:
[D] stands for a strength or constraint that is related to HIV case detection.
[R] stands for a strength or constraint that is related to retention in care.
Availability of ART sites according to different levels of HIV burden in 2009
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of provinces | 8 | | 29 | | 26 | |
| Number of districts | 122 | | 300 | | 268 | |
| Number of ART sites | 80 | | 88 | | 39 | |
| District with ART | 65 | | 72 | | 30 | |
| Density of ART site (%) | | 65.6 | | 29.3 | | 14.6 |
| (Number of ART sites / Number of districts x 100) | ||||||
| Estimated number of patients needing ART | 36,682 | (58.0) | 21,197 | (33.5) | 5,409 | (8.5) |
| Number of patients on ART | 25,449 | (70.7) | 8,464 | (23.5) | 2,095 | (5.8) |
| Estimated number of patients needing ART per district | 301 | | 71 | | 20 | |
| Number of ART patients per district | 209 | | 28 | | 8 | |
| ART coverage (%) | | | | | | |
| (Number of patients on ART / Estimated number of patients needing ART x 100) | 69.4 | 39.9 | 38.7 | |||
Remark: High burden province: over 300 reported cases per district and over 150 patients needing ART per district;
Middle burden province: over 100 reported cases per district or over 50 patients needing ART per district;
Low burden: less than 100 reported cases per district and less than 50 patients needing ART per district.
(Source: COPC review group: Unpublished report; 2010, Do TN: Unpublished presentation; 2010).
Figure 2Outcomes of people diagnosed HIV-positive and initiated ART.