Scale-dependent effects of grazing on plant C: N: P stoichiometry and linkages to ecosystem functioning in the Inner Mongolia grassland.

BACKGROUND: Livestock grazing is the most prevalent land use of grasslands worldwide. The effects of grazing on plant C, N, P contents and stoichiometry across hierarchical levels, however, have rarely been studied; particularly whether the effects are mediated by resource availability and the underpinning mechanisms remain largely unclear. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Using a multi-organization-level approach, we examined the effects of grazing on the C, N, and P contents and stoichiometry in plant tissues (leaves and roots) and linkages to ecosystem functioning across three vegetation types (meadow, meadow steppe, and typical steppe) in the Inner Mongolia grassland, China. Our results showed that the effects of grazing on the C, N, and P contents and stoichiometry in leaves and roots differed substantially among vegetation types and across different hierarchical levels (species, functional group, and vegetation type levels). The magnitude of positive effects of grazing on leaf N and P contents increased progressively along the hierarchy of organizational levels in the meadow, whereas its negative effect on leaf N content decreased considerably along hierarchical levels in both the typical and meadow steppes. Grazing increased N and P allocation to aboveground in the meadow, while greater N and P allocation to belowground was found in the typical and meadow steppes. The differences in soil properties, plant trait-based resource use strategies, tolerance or defense strategies to grazing, and shifts in functional group composition are likely to be the key mechanisms for the observed patterns among vegetation types.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that the enhanced vegetation-type-level N contents by grazing and species compensatory feedbacks may be insufficient to prevent widespread declines in primary productivity in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Hence, it is essential to reduce the currently high stocking rates and restore the vast degraded steppes for sustainable development of arid and semiarid grasslands.

Introduction

Livestock grazing is the most class="Chemical">prevaleclass="Chemical">nt laclass="Chemical">nd-use type of graclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">sslands worldwide, and has the potential to substantially affect community structure and primary productivity [1], [2], alter nutrient cycling [3], [4], [5], [6] and carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) pools [7]–[9] in grasslands. Overgrazing, in particular, has profound effects on multiple ecosystem functions and services, such as N retention, carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and ecosystem stability [10]–[12]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the impacts of herbivores on ecosystem N cycling can range from positive to negative. The accelerating N cycling hypothesis [4], [13]–[15] predicts that herbivore increases the tissue loss of grazing-tolerant species with high N content and litter quality, and directly deposits urine and feces to enhance soil available N, which stimulates net N mineralization and N utilization by plants, leading to the enhancement in shoot nutrients. The decelerating N cycling hypothesis [9], [16], [17], on the contrary, argues that grazing depresses the palatable and N-rich species due to herbivore selectivity, but promotes the dominance of those N-poor or defended species with low litter quality, contributing to slow N turnover and utilization, reducing shoot nutrients. Whether nutrient cycling increases or decreases in response to grazing likely depends on many abiotic and biotic factors, such as resource availability (e.g., soil water and nutrients), grazing duration, herbivore species, plant species and functional group compositions, and plant functional traits [9], [18]–[20].

A functional trait-based apclass="Chemical">proach to commuclass="Chemical">nity ecology has receclass="Chemical">ntly emerged as a class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">promising way to understand plant adaptive strategies, plant-herbivore interactions, and how they link to ecosystem functioning [21]–[23]. The C, N and P contents (%) and stoichiometry in plant tissues (e.g., leaves and roots) are associated with plant growth and ecosystem attributes, which strongly influence ecosystem processes (e.g., N cycling and litter decomposition) and plant responses to various environment variables and disturbance (e.g., precipitation, soil moisture, and grazing pressure) [24]. The N contents of leaves and roots are closely related to plant N uptake and utilization, and indicate N allocation between above- and belowground tissues. Previous studies demonstrated that grazing altered the C and N allocation between plant tissues [9], [25], [26], and heavy grazing increased N allocation to aboveground tissues [27]. Several studies also proposed that plant N and biomass allocation are largely dependent on resource availability [28]–[30]. For example, high soil nutrient availability and low light availability would favor plants allocating more N to stems or leaves than roots [28]. Therefore, grazing-induced shifts in resource allocation (e.g., N and P) between above- and belowground tissues may be meditated by resource availability. The stoichiometric ratios of C: N: P in plant leaves and litter have been widely used to determine N versus P limitation on plant growth, primary productivity and litter decomposition [31]–[34]. In general, plant species can generate positive feedbacks to N cycling, directly through uptake, utilize and loss of nutrients, and indirectly by influencing herbivory selectivity and microbial activity [35], [36]. Hence, plant resource-use strategies, above- vs. belowground competitive abilities, and tolerance vs. defense strategies to grazing may be responsible for diverse stoichiometric responses of different species, which are largely dependent on plant functional traits (e.g., physiological and morphological traits) [21], [23], [37], [38].

Leaf and root traits, e.g., N content of leaves and roots, specific leaf area (SLA), specific root length (SRL), net photosynthetic rate (Pn), photosynthetic nutrient use efficiency (PNUE), and water use efficiency (WUE), reflect plant resource-use strategies (acquisitive vs. conservative) and functional advantage in class="Chemical">abovegrouclass="Chemical">nd or light competitioclass="Chemical">n versus belowgrouclass="Chemical">nd competitioclass="Chemical">n [21], [28], [38]. The whole placlass="Chemical">nt traits, e.g., placlass="Chemical">nt height, iclass="Chemical">ndividual biomaclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ss, root: shoot ratio, and stem: leaf ratio, reflect plant biomass allocation between tissues and competitive capacity for light [29], [39]. In addition, leaf N content and C: N ratio are closely associated with foliar palatability, which further influence herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance or defense strategies to grazing [9], [17]. Thus, plant functional traits may provide important insights into the mechanisms underpinning plant responses to grazing. In the long-term, shifts in species or functional group compositions are likely to affect ecosystem-level response and nutrient dynamics [18]. Therefore, a variety of mechanisms may operate at different scales or organizational levels, which may involve positive, neutral, and negative effects. For a given system, the response may dependent upon the balance of these mechanisms. For example, the plant community-level response to grazing is likely determined by species-level responses, species abundance, and environment conditions [40]–[42]. The counterbalance between positive and negative feedbacks among vegetation types may affect the regional scale response to grazing. Also, the positive or negative effects may accumulate along the hierarchy of organizational levels. Our recent study demonstrated the effects of grazing on leaf traits are scale-dependant and varied with vegetation types [43]. Therefore, it is difficult to identify the mechanisms based on a single scale study, while an integrated research involving multiple organizational levels is critical for elucidating the underlying mechanisms of grazing impacts on ecosystem properties.

The arid and semiarid graclass="Chemical">sslaclass="Chemical">nds oclass="Chemical">n the Moclass="Chemical">ngolia plateau, which iclass="Chemical">nclude diverse vegetatioclass="Chemical">n types aclass="Chemical">nd distribute widely acroclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ss the Eurasian Steppe region, have been historically subjected to continuous grazing by livestock with high stocking rates, leading to widespread degradation in ecosystem function and services in recent decades [12], [44]. In the Inner Mongolia grassland, plant growth and primary productivity are co-limited by water and N availability [45], thus grazing impacts on plant functional traits and ecosystem functioning are likely mediated by water availability. Our recent studies suggest plant responses to grazing were greater in mesic than dry systems [43], and for a given ecosystem greater responses were found in wet than dry years [37].

In this study, we examined the effects of grazing on the C, N, and P contents and stoichiometry in plant ticlass="Chemical">ssues aclass="Chemical">nd soil acroclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ss three vegetation types (meadow, meadow steppe, and typical steppe) along a soil moisture gradient in the Xilin River Basin of Inner Mongolia grassland. Specifically, we address three questions: first, how does grazing affect the C, N, and P contents and stoichiometry in plant tissues (leaves and roots) at different hierarchical levels (plant species, functional group, and vegetation type level) and soil? Second, how do grazing effects on ecosystem functioning (e.g., above- and belowground standing biomass, C, N and P pools, and nutrient limitation) vary across different vegetation types? Third, what are the major mechanisms underpinning different stoichiometric responses across vegetation types in terms of soil properties, plant functional traits, and shifts in functional group compositions? To explore the underlying mechanisms of how grazing affects plant C: N: P stoichiometry and resource allocation across different levels of hierarchy, we hypothesize that: (1) the effects of grazing on plant C, N, and P contents and stoichiometry may become stronger along the hierarchical levels, i.e., from species to functional group to vegetation type. (2) The grazing effects on plant C: N: P stoichiometry and N and P allocation may strongly depend on resource availability, such as water and N. We expect that grazing may have positive effects on leaf nutrients (e.g., N and P contents) but negative effects on root nutrients in the wet and fertile meadow. In contrast, grazing may have no effects or even negative effects on leaf nutrients but positive effects on root nutrients in the dry and infertile typical steppe. Hence, grazing may elevate N and P allocation to aboveground in the meadow, but it may enhance N and P allocation to belowground in the typical and meadow steppes.

Methods

Study Area

The study was conducted in the Xilin River Basin (43°26′–44°29′N, 115°32′–117°12′E), which is located in the typical steppe region of the Inner Mongolia graclass="Chemical">sslaclass="Chemical">nd, class="Chemical">northerclass="Chemical">n Chiclass="Chemical">na, aclass="Chemical">nd covers aclass="Chemical">n area of 10 786 km2, with elevatioclass="Chemical">n raclass="Chemical">ngiclass="Chemical">ng from 983 to 1469 m. Meaclass="Chemical">n aclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">nual temperature is 0.4°C, with the lowest meaclass="Chemical">n moclass="Chemical">nthly temperature −21.4°C iclass="Chemical">n Jaclass="Chemical">nuary aclass="Chemical">nd the highest 19.0°C iclass="Chemical">n July. Meaclass="Chemical">n aclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">nual class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">precipitation is 336.9 mm yr−1, with about 80% occurring in the growing season (May–August). The dominant soil types are typical chestnut and dark chestnut, while meadow soil is a non-zonal soil type in this region [46]. Six pairs of parallel ungrazed and grazed plant communities, i.e., Carex appendiculata meadow, Stipa baicalensis meadow steppe, Leymus chinensis typical steppe, S. grandis typical steppe, Caragana microphylla typical steppe, and Artemisia frigida typical steppe were selected along a soil moisture gradient in the Xilin River Basin. The six pairs of plant communities include one for meadow, one for meadow steppe, and four for typical steppe, with the number of sites being proportional to its area. These communities are subjected to similar climatic conditions, such as temperature and precipitation, but differ in terms of floristic composition and soil properties, particularly soil moisture and nutrients. The ungrazed sites of communities are the permanent field sites of the Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecosystem Research Station (IMGERS), Chinese Academy of Sciences, which have been fenced from grazing for about 20–30 years [42]. In contrast, the grazed sites, located outside the fence of ungrazed sites, have been managed as free grazing pasture (mainly by sheep) since 1950s, thus they have about 60 years of grazing history. More detailed information for the six pairs of communities could be available from Zheng et al. [43].

Field Sampling and Measurements

Field sampling was carried out during 28 July to 14 August, 2007, when the class="Chemical">abovegrouclass="Chemical">nd staclass="Chemical">ndiclass="Chemical">ng biomaclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ss reached its annual peak [42]. At each site, aboveground biomass of plants were sampled by 5–10 quadrats (1×1 m each) located randomly within an area of 100 m ×100 m. Ten quadrats were used for meadow steppe and typical steppe, and 5 quadrats were for the more homogeneous meadow community. For the grazed sites, these quadrats were randomly located in the areas that were not subjected to grazing during the current growing season. Within each quadrat, all living biomass and current year dead materials were harvested by clipping to the soil surface, separated to species, and oven dried at 70°C for 24 h to constant mass and weighed. Litter biomass within each quadrat was collected. The aboveground biomass of each species was collected and transported to a laboratory for stem and leaf separation, then they were oven-dried at 70°C for 24 h to constant mass, thus stem biomass, leaf biomass, and plant biomass could be calculated. The total number of species, number of individuals, and aboveground biomass of each species were measured within each quadrat, which was used for estimating species richness, species abundance, and aboveground standing biomass of community at each site. The relative abundance of each species was obtained by calculating the proportion of individual density of each species to the total density. The relative biomass of each species was determined by its biomass ratio to the total community biomass. Belowground biomass was determined in late August, 2007, when it reached the annual peak in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Belowground biomass was sampled by randomly taking two 7-cm diameter soil cores from 0–20 cm depths inside each quadrat, and totally 10–20 samples at each site. Soil was rinsed out from roots under running water over a 1-mm screen, dead materials were picked out, and then root biomass was oven-dried at 65°C and weighed. Within each quadrat, soil samples were collected by taking three 5-cm diameter soil cores from 0–20 cm depths, mixed in situ as one composite sample, and hand-sorted to remove plant materials. Each soil sample was sieved through 2 mm mesh and separated into two parts. One was air-dried and ground to 80-mesh to determine soil total N, P, and organic C contents, the other maintained fresh to measure soil ammonium (NH4 +–N) and nitrate (NO3 −–N) contents. Soil samples were also taken from 0–20 cm layer with a soil bulk density auger, oven-dried at 105°C for 48 h, and weighed to determine soil bulk density.

After vegetation survey and soil sampling, leaf samples of dominant and common species were collected at each site. For each species, 10–20 fully grown individuals were randomly selected, and 2–3 mature fully expanded leaves were picked, which were further divided into 5 samples. The same number of individuals of each species that were not suffering from grazer bites was also collected at the grazed sites. In this study, 169 shared species at the ungrazed and grazed sites, including 81 genera and 29 families were collected acroclass="Chemical">ss three vegetatioclass="Chemical">n types, that is, 55 species iclass="Chemical">n the meadow, 54 species iclass="Chemical">n the meadow steppe, aclass="Chemical">nd 60 species iclass="Chemical">n four commuclass="Chemical">nities of the typical steppe. All species were claclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ssified into five functional groups based on life forms, i.e., perennial bunchgrasses (PB), perennial rhizome grasses (PR), perennial forbs (PF), annuals and biennials (AB), and shrubs and semi-shrubs (SS). Root samples of 19 shared dominant species were collected at the ungrazed and grazed sites in the meadow (6 species), meadow steppe (6 species) and typical steppe (7 species). For each species, 10 individuals were randomly selected, and root biomass were sampled by taking 7-cm diameter soil cores from 0–20 cm depths after removing aboveground parts, which were further divided into 5 samples. Leaf and root samples were dried at 60°C for 24 h in a forced-draught oven and ground to homogeneity with a ball mill (MM 2000; Retsch GmbH & Co, Haan, Germany) for C, N and P measurements.

The total N, P, and organic C contents (percentage dry maclass="Chemical">ss, %) iclass="Chemical">n soil aclass="Chemical">nd placlass="Chemical">nt ticlass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ssues (leaves and roots) were analyzed using the standard methods [47]. The organic C content was analyzed using K2Cr2O7-H2SO4 oxidation method. The total N content was determined using the Kjeldahl acid-digestion method with an Alpkem autoanalyzer (Kjektec System 1026 Distilling Unit, Sweden), and total P content was analyzed using the molybdenum blue colorimetric method with a UV/visible spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter DU 800, USA). Contents of soil NH4 +–N and NO3 −–N (mg kg−1) were determined using the 2 mol L−1 KCl extraction method (solution: sediment = 5∶1, 1-h extraction, solid separation by centrifugation followed by Whatman #1 paper filtration) with a flow injection autoanalyzer (FIAstar 5000 Analyzer, Foss Tecator, Denmark). Total available soil N was the sum of ammonium and nitrate contents. The total amounts of C, N and P (g m−2) in aboveground leaf biomass were calculated by multiplying leaf C, N and P contents with leaf biomass of each species within the quadrat. The C, N and P pool of belowground biomass (0–20 cm, g m−2) were calculated from root C, N and P contents multiplied by belowground biomass from 0–20 cm soil depth. Soil C, N and P pool (0–20 cm, g m−2) were obtained from the contents multiplied by soil bulk density [9].

Plant Functional Traits

Plant functional traits, including whole plant traits, e.g., plant height, individual biomaclass="Chemical">ss, stem: leaf biomaclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ss ratio (SLR), and root: shoot biomass ratio (RSR); leaf traits, e.g., leaf N content, leaf C:N ratio, specific leaf area (SLA), net photosynthetic rate (Pn), photosynthetic nutrient use efficiency (PNUE), and foliar stable carbon isotope composition (δ 13C); root traits, e.g., root N content, root C:N ratio, and specific root length (SRL); and reproductive traits, e.g., reproductive allocation (fruit biomass ratio) and seed mass were measured for dominant and common species at the ungrazed sites across three vegetation types. In particular, Pn, PNUE, foliar δ 13C, SRL, and reproductive traits were determined for species only in typical steppe. These plant traits were measured on 10–20 individuals for each species in early August. Plant height was measured by the distance from the basal stem to the natural crown of each individual. After the height measurement, aboveground part of each individual was collected and taken back to the laboratory for stem and leaf separation. All leaves of an individual were picked to determine the projected leaf area with a portable leaf area meter (Li-3100C; Li-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA), and the number of leaves were recorded isochronously. Then the stem and leaf samples were oven-dried at 70°C for 24 h to constant mass and weighted. Hence, individual leaf area, dry mass per leaf, stem biomass, leaf biomass, and individual biomass could be calculated, and specific leaf area (SLA, cm2 g−1) and stem: leaf ratio (SLR) were separately calculated as the ratio of leaf area to dry mass, and ratio of stem biomass to leaf biomass. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) was measured with a Li-6400 portable photosynthetic system (Li-6400, Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA) at a CO2 concentration of 400 µmol mol−1 (using the built-in Li-Cor 6400 CO2 controller) and a saturating irradiance of 1500 µmol m−2 s−1 provided by a built-in red LED light source. The photosynthetic nutrient use efficiency (PNUE, µmol CO2 mol−1 s−1) was defined to equal Pn divided by leaf N content. The foliar δ 13C value was analyzed with a stable isotope ratio mass spectrometer (MAT-253; Finnigan, San Jose, USA). The root: shoot ratio (RSR) was obtained by calculating the ratio of root biomass to aboveground biomass of each individual. The specific root length (SRL, m g−1) was determined by the ratio of total length of third-order roots to its dry mass [48], and root length was analyzed with a root analysis system (Delta-T Scan, Cambridge, UK). The reproductive allocation was calculated as the ratio of fruit biomass to individual biomass. The mature seeds were collected from 10–20 individuals of each species, and the sampling time was determined based on the mature season of species. Seeds were dried at room temperature for a week. For each species, the mean seed mass (mg seed−1) was the average dry mass of 20–100 individual seeds.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS Version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA, 2003). The effects of grazing on C, N, and P contents and C: N: P stoichiometory in soil and plant ticlass="Chemical">ssues (leaves aclass="Chemical">nd roots) at the species, placlass="Chemical">nt fuclass="Chemical">nctioclass="Chemical">nal group, aclass="Chemical">nd vegetatioclass="Chemical">n levels were tested with ANOVA, usiclass="Chemical">ng treatmeclass="Chemical">nt (grazed aclass="Chemical">nd uclass="Chemical">ngrazed), vegetatioclass="Chemical">n type (meadow, meadow steppe, aclass="Chemical">nd typical steppe ), aclass="Chemical">nd all iclass="Chemical">nteractioclass="Chemical">ns as fixed-effects. A total of 169 species class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">present at the paired ungrazed and grazed sites across three vegetation types were classified into three response groups, i.e., decreased, increased, and unchanged, based on their leaf nutrients response to grazing. The effects of grazing on the C, N and P pools of above- and belowground biomass and soil, above- and belowground standing biomass, and relative aboveground biomass of plant functional groups were also examined across three vegetation types. One-way ANOVAs followed by LSD multiple-range tests were performed to test differences in functional traits among four plant functional groups (PB, PR, PF and AB).

Results

Grazing Effects on Leaf Nutrients at Different Levels of Hierarchy

We examined the responses of leaf C, N and P contents and stoichiometry to grazing in 169 shared species at the ungrazed and grazed sites acron class="Chemical">ss three vegetatioclass="Chemical">n types. At placlass="Chemical">nt species level, graziclass="Chemical">ng sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly iclass="Chemical">ncreased leaf N aclass="Chemical">nd P coclass="Chemical">nteclass="Chemical">nts iclass="Chemical">n 62% aclass="Chemical">nd 58% of the total species iclass="Chemical">n the meadow, but leaf C coclass="Chemical">nteclass="Chemical">nt remaiclass="Chemical">ned uclass="Chemical">nchaclass="Chemical">nged iclass="Chemical">n 55% of species, resulticlass="Chemical">ng iclass="Chemical">n reductioclass="Chemical">n iclass="Chemical">n C: N aclass="Chemical">nd C: P ratios iclass="Chemical">n most of the species (Fig. 1). Leaf N: P ratio iclass="Chemical">n 33% of species was dimiclass="Chemical">nished by graziclass="Chemical">ng, aclass="Chemical">nd that iclass="Chemical">n 44% of species was uclass="Chemical">nchaclass="Chemical">nged. Iclass="Chemical">n the meadow steppe, leaf C, N, P coclass="Chemical">nteclass="Chemical">nts aclass="Chemical">nd stoichiometry remaiclass="Chemical">ned uclass="Chemical">nchaclass="Chemical">nged iclass="Chemical">n more thaclass="Chemical">n 50% of species, with other species either iclass="Chemical">ncreased or decreased iclass="Chemical">n leaf N aclass="Chemical">nd P coclass="Chemical">nteclass="Chemical">nts aclass="Chemical">nd stoichiometry. Iclass="Chemical">n the typical steppe, graziclass="Chemical">ng decreased leaf C, N aclass="Chemical">nd P coclass="Chemical">nteclass="Chemical">nts iclass="Chemical">n 47%, 38%, aclass="Chemical">nd 43% of species, respectively; but had class="Chemical">no sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt effects oclass="Chemical">n them iclass="Chemical">n 38%, 55% aclass="Chemical">nd 28% of species. The ratios of C: N, C: P aclass="Chemical">nd N: P iclass="Chemical">ncreased iclass="Chemical">n 32–33% of species, but they remaiclass="Chemical">ned uclass="Chemical">nchaclass="Chemical">nged iclass="Chemical">n 40–55% of species.

Figure 1

Percentages of species categorized as three groups based on responses of leaf C, N, P contents and stoichiometory to grazing.

M, meadow; MS, meadow steppe; and TS, typical steppe. Significant differences (P<0.05) between the grazed and ungrazed sites were analyzed for increased, decreased and unchanged response groups.

At functional group level, grazing had larger impacts on the meadow than the meadow steppe and typical steppe. The magnitudes of changes in leaf nutrients and stoichiometry were generally greater in perennial forbs (class="Chemical">PF), aclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">nuals aclass="Chemical">nd bieclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">nials (class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">AB), and perennial rhizome grasses (PR) than in perennial bunchgrasses (PB) and shrubs and semi-shrubs (SS) (Fig. 2). In the meadow, leaf N and P contents were significantly increased by grazing, while leaf C content remained unchanged in PF, leading to reduction in C: N, C: P and N: P ratios. For AB, leaf N content was significantly increased, leaf C content was slightly reduced, and leaf P content remained unchanged by grazing, resulting in decreased C: N and unchanged C: P and N: P ratios. For PB, grazing slightly increased leaf P content, and leaf C and N contents remained unchanged, with no change in C: N and N: P and reduction in C: P. In the meadow steppe, grazing diminished only leaf P content in PF and had no effects on leaf C and N contents, resulting in no change in C: N but increases in C: P and N: P ratios. In the typical steppe, leaf N content remained unchanged in all functional groups, leaf P content was increased in PR, and leaf C content was decreased in PB and PR, leading to no change in C: N and N: P ratios but reduced C: P ratio.

Figure 2

Effects of grazing on leaf C, N, P contents and stoichiometory at plant functional group and vegetation type levels.

The error bars are mean+SE. PB, perennial bunchgrasses; PR, perennial rhizomatous grasses; PF, perennial forbs; AB, annuals and biennials; SS, shrubs and semi-shrubs; M, meadow; MS, meadow steppe; TS, typical steppe; and XRB, Xilin River Basin. Significant differences between the grazed and ungrazed sites are reported from ANOVA as +, 0.05

The error bars are mean+SE. class="Chemical">PB, pereclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">nial buclass="Chemical">nchgraclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">sses; PR, perennial rhizomatous grasses; PF, perennial forbs; AB, annuals and biennials; SS, shrubs and semi-shrubs; M, meadow; MS, meadow steppe; TS, typical steppe; and XRB, Xilin River Basin. Significant differences between the grazed and ungrazed sites are reported from ANOVA as +, 0.05

At vegetation type level, grazing had greater effects on the meadow than the meadow steppe and typical steppe. In the meadow, both leaf N and P contents were increased, while leaf C content was decreased by grazing, causing reduction in C: N and C: P ratios and no change in N: P ratio (Fig. 2). In the meadow steppe, grazing diminished leaf P, and leaf C and N contents remained unchanged, leading to no change in C: N ratio but increases in C: P and N: P ratios. In the typical steppe, grazing only decreased leaf P content, but had no significant effects on C and N contents and C:N:P stoichiometry. When three vegetation types were pooled together, leaf N was significantly enhanced, leaf C was diminished, and leaf P remained unchanged, leading to diminished C: N ratio in the Xilin River Basin (Fig. 2).

Root Nutrients and Stoichiometry

At plant species level, grazing significantly enhanced root N in one of six species in the meadow, diminished root C in three species, resulting in decreased C: N ratio in two species, and increased N: P ratio in one species (Fig. S1). Root P and C: P ratio remained unchanged in all six species. In the meadow steppe, grazing increased root N in two of six species and root P in one species, leading to decreased C: P and N: P ratios of this species. In the typical steppe, grazing significantly increased root N in three and P content in four of seven species, but it decreased root C in three species, contributing to the reduced C: N, C: P and N: P ratios in these species.

At functional group level, grazing generally had greater effects on class="Chemical">PF aclass="Chemical">nd class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">PR than PB and SS (Fig. 3). In the meadow, grazing decreased root C content and C: N ratio in PF and PB, but had no significant effects on their N and P contents, C: P and N: P ratios. In the meadow steppe, however, grazing only increased root N and P contents in PF, leading to decreased C: P and N: P ratios. In the typical steppe, grazing increased root N and P contents, but decreased C: P and N: P ratios in PR. For PB, however, grazing decreased root C content, while N and P contents remained unchanged, resulting in declines in root C: N and C: P ratios.

Figure 3

Effects of grazing on root C, N, P contents and stoichiometory at plant functional group and vegetation type levels.

The error bars are mean+SE. Significant levels and all symbols are derived as in Fig. 2.

At vegetation type level, grazing had greater effects on the typical steppe than the meadow steppe and meadow (Fig. 3). Root C and C: N ratio decreased while N and P contents and C: P and N: P ratios remained unchanged in the meadow. Grazing significantly increased root N and P contents, while root C content remained unchanged in the meadow steppe, leading to reduction in root C: P and N: P ratios. In the typical steppe, root N and P contents were increased, while root C content was slightly decreased by grazing, which leads to decreases in root C: N and C: P ratios and no change in N: P ratio. In the Xilin River Basin, root N content was significantly increased, root C content was decreased, while root P content remained unchanged, resulting in decreased C: N and C: P ratios and unchanged N: P ratio.

Soil Nutrients and Stoichiometry

Soil C, N and P contents and total availclass="Chemical">able N (class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ammonium+nitrate) were much higher in the meadow than the meadow steppe and typical steppe (Fig. S2). Grazing only caused minor shifts in soil nutrients and stoichiometry across the three vegetation types in the Xilin River Basin. Soil P was slightly decreased (P<0.1) by grazing in the meadow. Soil C: N was slightly increased (P<0.1) in the meadow steppe but decreased in the typical steppe.

C, N and P Pools of Above- and Belowground

In the meadow, grazing increased the N and P pools of leaf biomaclass="Chemical">ss by 104–183%, but had class="Chemical">no sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt effects oclass="Chemical">n C, N aclass="Chemical">nd P pools of belowgrouclass="Chemical">nd biomaclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ss due to large variations (Fig. 4). In the meadow steppe, however, grazing significantly increased C, N and P pools of belowground biomass by 74–107%, but had no significant effects on those of aboveground biomass. In the typical steppe, grazing decreased the C, N and P pools of both above- (by 46–51%) and belowground biomass (by 17–25%, except for P pool). Grazing had no significant effects on soil C, N and P pools across the three vegetation types, except soil P pool was slightly decreased (P<0.1) in the meadow (Fig. 4). In the Xilin River Basin, the C, N and P pools in above- and belowground biomass and soil remained unchanged.

Figure 4

Effects of grazing on C, N, and P pools in above- and belowground biomass and soil (0–20 cm).

The error bars are mean+SE. Significant differences between the grazed and ungrazed sites are reported from ANOVA as ns, P>0.1; +, 0.05

The error bars are mean+SE. Significant differences between the grazed and ungrazed sites are reported from ANOVA as ns, P>0.1; +, 0.05n Fig. 2.

Above- and Belowground Standing Biomass and Functional Group Composition

Grazing significantly decreased the class="Chemical">abovegrouclass="Chemical">nd staclass="Chemical">ndiclass="Chemical">ng biomaclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ss by 34%, but had no significant effect on belowground biomass in the meadow (Fig. 5). In the meadow steppe, however, belowground biomass was enhanced by 71%, but aboveground biomass remained unchanged. Grazing diminished the aboveground biomass by 48% and belowground biomass by 23% in the typical steppe. On average, both the above- and belowground standing biomass were unchanged in the Xilin River Basin. In the meadow, the relative biomass of PF was increased by 95%, while that of PB was decreased by 65% (Fig. 5). In the meadow steppe, grazing increased the relative biomass of PR by 99%, but decreased that of PB by 33%. In the typical steppe, grazing increased the relative biomass of PB by 98%, but decreased PR by 66% and PF by 45%. The relative biomass of AB and SS, in contrast, remained unchanged across three vegetation types.

Figure 5

Effects of grazing on above- and belowground standing biomass and plant functional group composition.

The error bars are mean+SE. PB, perennial bunchgrasses; PR, perennial rhizomatous grasses; PF, perennial forbs; AB, annuals and biennials; SS, shrubs and semi-shrubs; M, meadow; MS, meadow steppe; TS, typical steppe; and XRB, Xilin River Basin. Significant levels are as in Fig. 4.

The error bars are mean+SE. class="Chemical">PB, pereclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">nial buclass="Chemical">nchgraclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">sses; PR, perennial rhizomatous grasses; PF, perennial forbs; AB, annuals and biennials; SS, shrubs and semi-shrubs; M, meadow; MS, meadow steppe; TS, typical steppe; and XRB, Xilin River Basin. Significant levels are as in Fig. 4.

Multi-trait comparison showed that different functional groups differed substantially (P<0.05) in 9 out of 15 plant functional traits, including whole plant traits, leaf traits, root traits, and reclass="Chemical">productive traits (Tclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">able 1). The PB exhibited greater plant height, individual biomass, root: shoot ratio, stem: leaf ratio, leaf C: N ratio, and root N content, but lower leaf N content, specific leaf area (SLA), root C: N ratio, and reproductive allocation. In contrast, AB showed lower plant height, individual biomass, root: shoot ratio, stem: leaf ratio, leaf C: N ratio, and root N content, but higher leaf N content, SLA, root C: N ratio, and reproductive allocation. Moreover, AB generally had higher net photosynthetic rate (Pn), photosynthetic nutrient use efficiency (PNUE), and water use efficiency indicated by δ 13C value. For PF and PR (i.e., Leymus chinensis), the values of functional traits were intermediate between PB and AB. For example, these species showed relatively lower leaf N content, SLA, Pn, and reproductive allocation, but higher plant height, individual biomass, leaf C: N ratio, and root N content than AB. Compared to PB and PF, PR and AB usually exhibited higher specific root length (SRL) and smaller seed mass.

Table 1

Plant functional traits of four functional groups across three vegetation types in the Xilin River Basin of Inner Mongolia grassland.

	Whole plant traits				Leaf traits						Root traits			Reproductive traits
PFGs	Plant height (cm)	Individual biomass (g)	RSR (g·g−1)	SLR (g·g−1)	Leaf N (%)	Leaf C:N ratio (g·g−1)	SLA (cm2·g−1)	Pn (µmol CO2·m−2·s−1)	PNUE (µmol CO2·mol−1·s−1)	δ 13C (‰)	Root N (%)	Root C:N ratio (g·g−1)	SRL (m·g−1)	Seed mass (mg·seed−1)	RA (%)
PB	42.42a	1.99a	0.66ab	2.50a	2.26b	20.96a	93.62b	14.42ab	120.96	−24.40	1.11a	38.17b	97.63	3.57	6.30b
PR	34.28ab	0.56ab	0.28b	0.87b	2.59ab	18.63ab	59.59b	16.50ab	104.04	−26.41	1.01a	45.20b	122.55	1.89	0.25c*
PF	32.72b	1.81a	1.52a	1.33b	2.32b	20.63a	114.21ab	9.80b	68.02	−26.45	1.12a	40.90b	95.54	3.51	12.07b
AB	18.91c	0.48b	0.49b	1.21b	2.79a	17.49b	133.64a	20.35a	139.74	−23.63	0.75b	67.62a	104.10	0.70	24.70a
P value	<0.001	0.044	0.018	0.025	0.021	0.092	0.009	0.112	0.182	0.19	<0.001	<0.001	0.846	0.333	0.005

Abbreviations: PFGs, plant functional groups; PB, perennial bunchgrasses; PR, perennial rhizomatous grasses; PF, perennial forbs; AB, annuals and biennials; RSR, root: shoot biomass ratio; SLR, stem: leaf biomass ratio; SLA, specific leaf area; Pn, net photosynthetic rate; PNUE, photosynthetic nutrient use efficiency; δ13C, Carbon isotope ratio; SRL, specific root length; RA, reproductive allocation. *, The dominant dispersal mode for perennial rhizomatous grass (i.e., Leymus chinensis) is rhizome, with rhizome biomass accounting for 30% of the total plant biomass. P values following one-way ANOVAs indicate differences in plant functional traits among four functional groups. Different lowercases represent significant differences among plant functional groups (LSD multiple-range tests, P<0.05). The sample sizes of functional traits (plant height, individual biomass, SLR, SLA, leaf N and C: N ratio, and root N and C: N ratio) are 27, 5, 104 and 23 for PB, PR, PF and AB, respectively across meadow, meadow steppe and typical steppes. The sample sizes of functional traits (RSR, Pn, PNUE, δ13C, SRL, seed mass and RA) are 5, 3, 10–21 and 8 for PB, PR, PF and AB, respectively in typical steppe.

class="Chemical">Abbreviatioclass="Chemical">ns: class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">PFGs, plant functional groups; PB, perennial bunchgrasses; PR, perennial rhizomatous grasses; PF, perennial forbs; AB, annuals and biennials; RSR, root: shoot biomass ratio; SLR, stem: leaf biomass ratio; SLA, specific leaf area; Pn, net photosynthetic rate; PNUE, photosynthetic nutrient use efficiency; δ13C, Carbon isotope ratio; SRL, specific root length; RA, reproductive allocation. *, The dominant dispersal mode for perennial rhizomatous grass (i.e., Leymus chinensis) is rhizome, with rhizome biomass accounting for 30% of the total plant biomass. P values following one-way ANOVAs indicate differences in plant functional traits among four functional groups. Different lowercases represent significant differences among plant functional groups (LSD multiple-range tests, P<0.05). The sample sizes of functional traits (plant height, individual biomass, SLR, SLA, leaf N and C: N ratio, and root N and C: N ratio) are 27, 5, 104 and 23 for PB, PR, PF and AB, respectively across meadow, meadow steppe and typical steppes. The sample sizes of functional traits (RSR, Pn, PNUE, δ13C, SRL, seed mass and RA) are 5, 3, 10–21 and 8 for PB, PR, PF and AB, respectively in typical steppe.

Discussion

Hierarchical Plant C: N: P Stoichiometric Responses to Grazing

Our findings suggest that the effects of grazing on plant C, N, and P contents and stoichiometry increased class="Chemical">progreclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ssively along the hierarchy of organizational levels, i.e., from plant species to functional group to vegetation type. Grazing enhanced vegetation-type-level N contents characterized by the increased N contents and decreased C: N ratios of plant tissues (leaves and roots) in the Xilin River Basin. However, grazing has contrasting effects on plant stoichiometry and linkage to resource allocation across the three vegetation types, as indicated by the changes in N and P contents, C: N and C: P ratios of leaves and roots at different hierarchical levels (species, functional group, and vegetation type level). In the meadow, grazing enhanced leaf N and P contents but reduced C: N and C: P ratios at three levels of hierarchy. The magnitudes of positive effects of grazing on leaf N and P contents and negative effects on C: N and C: P ratios increased along the hierarchy of organizational levels. In contrast, the magnitude of reduction in leaf N content and increase in C: N ratio diminished considerably along the hierarchy of organizational levels in the typical and meadow steppes. Compared to the leaf stoichiometry, root C: N: P stoichiometry exhibited opposite response patterns to grazing. In the typical and meadow steppes, the magnitudes of positive effects of grazing on root N and P contents and negative effects on C: N and C: P ratios increased along hierarchical levels. In the meadow, however, the magnitude of root stoichiometric responses to grazing decreased at higher hierarchical levels. These findings support our original hypothesis and further suggest that plant stoichiometric responses to grazing are largely mediated by site conditions and are often scale-dependent. Greater and positive leaf responses (i.e., leaf N and P contents increased) but weaker root responses were found in wetter habitats (meadow). On the contrary, stronger and positive root responses (i.e., root N and P contents increased) but weaker and negative leaf responses were found in drier habitats (typical and meadow steppes). This indicates that grazing increases resource allocation to aboveground tissues in the meadow, but it enhances N and P allocation to belowground tissues in the typical and meadow steppes. These results are consistent with the prediction of our second hypothesis, and are also corroborated by previous studies [9], [43]. The minor shifts in soil C, N, and P contents and stoichiometry across the three vegetation types indicate that soil responses to grazing may be subject to a time-lag effect compared to the strong vegetation responses [49], [50].

Our results showed the alterations of C, N and P pools in class="Chemical">above- aclass="Chemical">nd belowgrouclass="Chemical">nd biomaclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ss were caused by changes both in absolute biomass and tissue nutrient contents (leaves and roots). For example, grazing diminished the C, N and P pools of aboveground biomass in the typical steppe, which is mainly attributable to sharply decrease in leaf biomass (by 47%). Grazing enhanced N and P pools of belowground biomass, caused by increases in root N and P contents. The increments in aboveground N and P pools are also mainly attributable to the increased leaf N and P contents in the meadow. In the meadow steppe, however, the increments in belowground C, N and P pools are due to both the increased root biomass (by 71%) and N and P contents. This indicates that the shifts in resource allocation between above- and belowground biomass in response to grazing may change with vegetation type or site conditions. The C, N and P pools of topsoil (0–20 cm) were less affected by grazing across the three vegetation types, because both soil bulk density and nutrient contents remained relatively unchanged. This is consistent with the results from a 7-yr field experiment conducted in the N-limited Minnesota oak savanna [9]. Compared to the meadow steppe and typical steppe, the meadow had much higher above- and belowground standing biomass, and C, N and P pools of above- and belowground biomass and soil. The minor shifts in these plant and soil properties in the Xilin River Basin are attributable to the counterbalance between the positive and negative responses to grazing among vegetation types. This implies that ecosystem resilience to grazing is relatively high in these grasslands, although they have been subjected to free-grazing for 20–30 years. Our findings further suggest that grazing effects on C: N: P stoichiometry are closely linked to ecosystem functions, such as resource allocation and nutrient pools.

Mechanisms Underpinning Grazing-induced Changes in Plant C: N: P Stoichiometry

Several mechanisms are likely to be responsible for the differential effects of grazing on plant C: N: P stoichiometry acroclass="Chemical">ss differeclass="Chemical">nt vegetatioclass="Chemical">n types. First, soil class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">properties, particularly soil water and nutrient availability, are likely to be responsible for the contrasting effects of grazing on plant stoichiometry between the meadow and typical steppe. The field holding capacity in the meadow (52%) is two times higher than that in the typical steppe (26%), which may facilitate the utilization of urine and dung deposited by herbivores and improve the soil available N directly, thereby promote plant nutrient absorption [3], [19]. In the typical steppe, however, the low soil moisture and high temperature in the growing season might inhibit the process of N mineralization and nutrient utilization by plants [51]. This is because water availability is a key limiting factor in arid and semiarid grasslands, which is tightly coupled with soil N availability to affect plant growth and primary productivity [42], [45]. In addition, soil carbon and nutrients (N and P) and cation exchange capacity (CEC) are much higher, but soil pH and bulk density are lower in the meadow than the typical steppe [43]. These factors favor tolerant species in the meadow to take up nutrients quickly and accelerate tissue regrowth to compensate for biomass loss by herbivores [9], [35]. Young tissues usually have higher nutrient contents than mature or senescent ones. In the meadow steppe, soil water and nutrient availability are intermediate between the meadow and typical steppe, resulting in a moderate response of plant stoichiometry to grazing. Our findings suggest that the effects of grazing on plant C, N, and P contents and stoichiometry are likely mediated by resource availability. These results are consistent with our original predictions that grazing generally has positive effects on leaf nutrients (e.g., N and P contents) in wet and fertile habitats but had no effects or even negative effects on leaf nutrients in dry and infertile habitats.

Second, plant functional traits, which are closely linked to plant resource-use strategies, class="Chemical">above- vs. belowgrouclass="Chemical">nd competitive class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">abilities, and tolerance vs. defense strategies to grazing, are responsible for the diverse stoichiometric responses of different functional groups. The annuals and biennials exhibit acquisitive resource-use strategy in fertile habitats, such as high leaf N content and specific leaf area (SLA), high specific root length (SRL) and root C: N ratio, high net photosynthetic rate (Pn), photosynthetic nutrient use efficiency (PNUE), and water use efficiency (δ 13C), but low root N content, root: shoot ratio, and leaf C: N ratio, corresponding to great aboveground/light competitive ability. These species also adopt tolerance strategy to grazing, reflecting by high foliar palatability (e.g., high leaf N content, but low leaf C: N ratio) to improve herbivore selectivity, high biomass allocation to leaves (e.g., high leaf N content and SLA, but low stem: leaf ratio, root: shoot ratio, and root N content) to accelerate shoot regrowth following defoliation. Thus annuals and biennials generally allocate more resource to shoots and increase leaf nutrients in response to grazing. In addition, these annuals and biennials have high recruitment capacity, reflected by reproductive traits of small seed, high reproductive output, and short life history. Hence, these species have the competitive advantage in resource exploitation and they maintain relatively stable species compositions across three vegetation types as indicated by their relative biomass.

In contrast, most perennial bunchgraclass="Chemical">sses are xerophyte which adopt coclass="Chemical">nservative resource-use strategy iclass="Chemical">n dry aclass="Chemical">nd class="Chemical">nutrieclass="Chemical">nt-poor hclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">abitats. These species generally exhibit traits characterized by high root N content, root: shoot ratio, and leaf C: N ratio, but low leaf N content, SLA, and SRL, corresponding to great belowground competitive ability. The greater plant height, individual biomass and stem: leaf ratio of these species suggest the functional advantage in light interception, thus they can maintain relatively higher light, nitrogen and water use efficiencies, as reflected by the high Pn, PNUE and δ 13C. In addition, perennial bunchgrasses adopt defense strategy to grazing, indicated by low foliar palatability (e.g., low leaf N content and SLA, but high leaf C: N ratio) to decrease herbivore selectivity and thereby restrain compensatory growth. Therefore, the perennial bunchgrass dominated plant communities have the advantage in belowground resource competition, leading to weak leaf stoichiometric responses to grazing.

class="Disease">Perennial rhizomatous graclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">sses (i.e., Leymus chinensis) are meso-xerophyte which generally adopt both acquisitive and conservative resource-use strategies characterized by relatively higher plant height, leaf N content, and photosynthetic rate (Pn) for aboveground/light competition, and higher root N content and specific root length (SRL) for belowground competition. In addition, these species have high foliar palatability and allocate more biomass to leaves thus exhibiting more tolerance following grazing. Moreover, L. chinensis has well-developed laterally spread rhizomes to reproduce vegetative tillers, of which rhizome biomass accounted for 30% of the total plant biomass. The perennial forbs are dominant species in the meadow and meadow steppe and are also widely distributed in the typical steppe. The traits of perennial forbs associated with resource-use strategy, above- vs. belowground competitive ability, and grazing-tolerance are intermediate between the annuals and biennials and perennial bunchgrasses, leading to a moderate response to grazing. The differences in functional traits among different functional groups indicate the fundamental trade-offs between productivity and persistence of species, and further reflect the contrasting species-specific tolerance and defense strategies to grazing. In the Inner Mongolia grassland, the meadow is mainly dominated by perennial forbs and annuals and biennials, with more acquisitive resource-use strategies, great aboveground competitive ability, and fast regrowth following defoliation, suggesting a potential for increasing resource allocation to aboveground tissue and leaf nutrient contents as response to grazing. The typical steppe, however, is dominated by perennial bunchgrasses, with more conservative resource-use strategies, strong belowground competitive ability, and low compensatory growth, indicating a shift towards increasing belowground allocation and root nutrient contents in response to grazing. In the meadow steppe, perennial forbs and perennial bunchgrasses are two dominant life forms, which drive an intermediate response to grazing between the meadow and typical steppe. These results are consistent with the prediction of our second hypothesis that grazing enhances N and P allocation to aboveground in the meadow, but it increases N and P allocation to belowground in the typical and meadow steppes.

Third, the shifts in plant functional group compositions are the major mechanisms driving vegetation-type-level stoichiometric responses and nutrient dynamics. In the meadow, the shift in dominance from perennial bunchgraclass="Chemical">sses to pereclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">nial forbs leads to iclass="Chemical">ncrease iclass="Chemical">n leaf class="Chemical">nutrieclass="Chemical">nts (N aclass="Chemical">nd P) but class="Chemical">no chaclass="Chemical">nge iclass="Chemical">n root class="Chemical">nutrieclass="Chemical">nts iclass="Chemical">n respoclass="Chemical">nse to graziclass="Chemical">ng. Oclass="Chemical">n the coclass="Chemical">ntrary, the shift iclass="Chemical">n domiclass="Chemical">naclass="Chemical">nce from class="Chemical">n class="Disease">perennial rhizomatous grasses to perennial bunchgrasses results in the increases in root nutrients (N and P) but no change or even decreases in leaf nutrients in response to grazing. In the meadow steppe, perennial forbs were replaced by perennial rhizomatous grasses and perennial bunchgrasses, leading to an intermediate response between the meadow and typical steppe.

N Versus P Limitation Across Vegetation Types

Our results suggest that grazing potentially increases P limitation in the semiarid graclass="Chemical">sslaclass="Chemical">nd of the Xiliclass="Chemical">n River Basiclass="Chemical">n, as evideclass="Chemical">nced by the eclass="Chemical">nhaclass="Chemical">nced N coclass="Chemical">nteclass="Chemical">nt aclass="Chemical">nd N: P ratio. The N: P ratio was, oclass="Chemical">n average, 17.2 at the grazed sites, which is higher thaclass="Chemical">n the threshold of 16∶1 for P limitatioclass="Chemical">n [31]. Iclass="Chemical">n additioclass="Chemical">n, the average C: P ratio was 311 at grazed sites, which is higher thaclass="Chemical">n the hypothesized threshold of 250∶1 required for efficieclass="Chemical">nt growth of P-rich herbivores feediclass="Chemical">ng oclass="Chemical">n comparclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ably C-rich plants, indicating potential P deficiency in these habitats [32]. However, the effects of grazing on nutrient limitation differed across the three vegetation types. Neither N nor P limitation was observed in the meadow, N and P co-limitation in typical steppe, and more P limitation in the meadow steppe. In the meadow, soil nutrients, N and P contents of leaves and roots, and community biomass of above- and belowground were generally higher than those in the typical steppe and meadow steppe. Grazing decreased C: P ratio from 253 to 168 (lower than 250∶1), while N: P ratio (11.4) remained unchanged, which suggests the community is not subject to either N or P limitation. In the typical steppe, both the N: P (19.7) and C: P ratios (345) were relatively less affected by grazing. These factors together with the lowest soil N availability, above- and belowground biomass indicate that the typical steppe is co-limited by N and P. In the meadow steppe, however, grazing enhanced N: P (20.3) and C: P (418) ratios, indicating a shift towards P limitation. In this study, the mean N: P ratio of meadow (12.7 for ungrazed vs. 11.4 for grazed) is lower than previously documented threshold of 14∶1 for N limitation, and N: P ratio of typical steppe (19.6 for ungrazed vs. 19.7 for grazed) is out of the range between 14 and 16 for N and P co-limitation [31], indicating that using foliar N: P ratio to determine nutrient limitation needs more careful interpretation. The limitation threshold may be ecosystem-specific or dependent on site conditions.

In the meadow, grazing enhanced leaf N and P contents, but had little effects on root N and P contents acroclass="Chemical">ss differeclass="Chemical">nt hierarchical levels. This iclass="Chemical">ndicates more class="Chemical">nutrieclass="Chemical">nts are reallocated to class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">aboveground for supporting shoot regrowth, and P availability maybe sufficient to support stoichiometrically balanced growth for plants. Our results are corroborated by a previous study [52], which demonstrated that when soil nutrients are abundant, plant nutrient contents (especially P) may be unchanged or even increase following defoliation. It is likely because plants need to allocate sufficient P to recover from defoliation in order to produce ribosomal RNA to replace the N-rich photosynthetic proteins lost to grazers [32], [53]. On the contrary, the enhanced root N and P contents but the unchanged leaf N and declined leaf P content observed in the typical steppe and meadow steppe, suggesting more nutrients are invested to belowground. Previous studies also found grazing-tolerant species exhibit positive feedbacks to herbivory by promoting root exudation of carbon to stimulate rhizospheric microbial populations for soil N mineralization [26], [36]. In our study, we found the dominant perennial bunchgrasses, such as S. grandis, A. cristatum, Achnatherum sibiricum, C. squarrosa, and L. chinensis in typical steppe generally have roots with rhizosheath, which favors nutrient absorption and water reservation in resource-poor habitats [54]. Tian et al. [55] reported most of dominant and subdominant plant species in typical steppe are colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, which could improve plant P uptake, thereby lessen the defoliation-induced P limitation [56]. Nevertheless, these compensatory feedbacks may be insufficient to prevent widespread N or P limitation across a broad geographic region, especially in arid and semiarid grasslands.

Conclusions

Using a multi-organization-level apclass="Chemical">proach, our study democlass="Chemical">nstrates the effects of graziclass="Chemical">ng oclass="Chemical">n the C, N aclass="Chemical">nd P coclass="Chemical">nteclass="Chemical">nts aclass="Chemical">nd stoichiometry of placlass="Chemical">nt ticlass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ssues (leaves and roots) are scale-dependant, and they may change with vegetation type or site conditions. However, soil nutrients exhibit weak responses. Grazing-induced shifts in resource allocation between above- and belowground and nutrient limitation as indicated by leaf stoichiometry differed across vegetation types. Grazing increases N and P allocation to aboveground in the meadow, but it enhances N and P allocation to belowground in the typical and meadow steppes. Neither N nor P limitation was found in the meadow, with N and P co-limitation in the typical steppe and P limitation in the meadow steppe. Our findings suggest that the enhanced vegetation-type-level N contents by grazing and species compensatory feedbacks may be insufficient to prevent widespread declines in primary productivity and nutrient pools in the Inner Mongolia grassland, although they could moderately mitigate the impacts of nutrient limitation. Hence, it is essential to reduce the currently high stocking rates and restore the vast degraded steppes for sustainable development of arid and semiarid grasslands.

Effects of grazing on root C, N, P contents and stoichiometory of dominant species acroclass="Chemical">ss three vegetatioclass="Chemical">n types. The error bars are meaclass="Chemical">n+SE. Sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt differeclass="Chemical">nces betweeclass="Chemical">n the grazed aclass="Chemical">nd uclass="Chemical">ngrazed sites are reported from ANOVA class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">as +, 0.05Abbreviations: Ag, Agrostis gigantea; Ca, Carex appendiculata; Br, Blysmus rufus; Pan, Potentilla anserina; Ib, Inula britanica; Ss, Sium suave; Sb, Stipa baicalensis; Ac, Agropyron cristatum; Sc, Serratula centauroides; As, Allium senescens; Pac, Potentilla acaulis; Af, Artemisia frigida; Lc, Leymus chinensis; Sg, Stipa grandis; Cs, Cleistogenes squarrosa; Ks, Koeleria cristata; Cm, Caragana microphylla; M, meadow; MS, meadow steppe; TS, typical steppe.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.

Effects of grazing on soil C, N, P contents, n class="Chemical">inorganic N (NH The error bars are meaclass="Chemical">n+SE. M, meadow; MS, meadow steppe; TS, typical steppe; aclass="Chemical">nd XRB, Xiliclass="Chemical">n River Basiclass="Chemical">n. Sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt differeclass="Chemical">nces betweeclass="Chemical">n the grazed aclass="Chemical">nd uclass="Chemical">ngrazed sites are reported from ANOVA class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">as +, 0.05

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.