Literature DB >> 23271630

ERPs and morphological processing: the N400 and semantic composition.

Donna Coch1, Jennifer Bares, Allison Landers.   

Abstract

Both behavioral and electrophysiological evidence suggests that fluent readers decompose morphologically complex words into their constituent parts. Previous event-related potential (ERP) research has been equivocal with regard to whether the N400 component indexes morphological decomposition or the integration of the products of decomposition, a process called semantic composition. In a visual lexical decision task with college students, we recorded ERPs to a well-controlled set of words and nonwords made up of bound morphemes (discern, predict; disject, percern) or free morphemes (cobweb, earring; cobline, bobweb) and monomorphemic control words and nonwords (garlic, minnow; gartus, buzlic). For each of the three morphological types, participants were faster to respond to words than to nonwords. Furthermore, for each of the three morphological types, the amplitude of the N400 was more negative to nonwords than to matched words, an effect indicating that the N400 is more sensitive to the lexicality of the whole stimulus than to the meaningfulness of the constituent parts of the stimulus. The N400 lexicality effect was not significantly different across the three morphological types. To our knowledge, this is the first ERP study to directly compare the processing of printed sets of words composed of bound and free morphemes and monomorphemic control stimuli in order to explore the relative sensitivity of the N400 to morphological decomposition (i.e., the status of the parts) and semantic composition (i.e., the status of the whole). Our findings are consistent with an interpretation of the N400 as an index of a process of semantic composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23271630     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-012-0145-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  62 in total

1.  Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG.

Authors:  Liina Pylkkänen; Alec Marantz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Morphological decomposition involving non-productive morphemes: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Richard McKinnon; Mark Allen; Lee Osterhout
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 3.  Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies.

Authors:  Cyma Van Petten; Barbara J Luka
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 4.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400.

Authors:  Ellen F Lau; Colin Phillips; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Interpreting dissociations between regular and irregular past-tense morphology: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Timothy Justus; Jary Larsen; Paul de Mornay Davies; Diane Swick
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Semantic composition engenders an N400: evidence from Chinese compounds.

Authors:  Chen Bai; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky; Luming Wang; Yu-Chen Hung; Matthias Schlesewsky; Petra Burkhardt
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing.

Authors:  P J Holcomb
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection.

Authors:  Aaron J Newman; Michael T Ullman; Roumyana Pancheva; Diane L Waligura; Helen J Neville
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Sub- and supralexical information in early phases of lexical access.

Authors:  Juhani Järvikivi; Pirita Pyykkönen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-10-25
View more
  4 in total

1.  Do Morphemes Matter when Reading Compound Words with Transposed Letters? Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.331

2.  Age of Acquisition Effects on Word Processing for Chinese Native Learners' English: ERP Evidence for the Arbitrary Mapping Hypothesis.

Authors:  Jin Xue; Tongtong Liu; Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos; Xuna Pei
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-18

3.  Expectancy effects in the EEG during joint and spontaneous word-by-word sentence production in German.

Authors:  Tatiana Goregliad Fjaellingsdal; Diana Schwenke; Stefan Scherbaum; Anna K Kuhlen; Sara Bögels; Joost Meekes; Martin G Bleichner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Studying brain activity during word-by-word interactions using wireless EEG.

Authors:  Tatiana Goregliad Fjaellingsdal; Diana Schwenke; Esther Ruigendijk; Stefan Scherbaum; Martin Georg Bleichner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.