Literature DB >> 23271517

Grading lipoaspirate: is there an optimal density for fat grafting?

Robert J Allen1, Orlando Canizares, Carrie Scharf, Phuong D Nguyen, Vishal Thanik, Pierre B Saadeh, Sydney R Coleman, Alexes Hazen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical results of fat grafting have been unpredictable. In this article, the authors hypothesize that centrifugation creates "graded densities" of fat with varying characteristics that influence lipoaspirate persistence and quality.
METHODS: Aliquots of human female lipoaspirate (10 cc) were centrifuged for 3 minutes at 1200 g. The bloody and oil fractions were discarded. Subsequently, 1.0 cc of the highest density and lowest density fat was separated for lipoinfiltration or analysis. Highest density or lowest density fat grafted into adult FVB mice was harvested at 2 and 10 weeks to quantify short- and long-term persistence, respectively. Progenitor cell number and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, stromal cell-derived factor-1α, platelet-derived growth factor, and adiponectin were analyzed by flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively.
RESULTS: Greater percentages of highest density fat grafts remain at 2 and 10 weeks after injection compared with lowest density fat grafts (85.4 ± 1.9 percent versus 62.3 ± 0.1 percent, p = 0.05; and 60.8 ± 4.9 versus 42.2 ± 3.9, p < 0.05, respectively). Highest density fractions contain more progenitor cells per gram than lowest density fractions (2.0 ± 0.2-fold increase, p < 0.01). Furthermore, concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor, stromal vascular fraction, platelet-derived growth factor, and adiponectin are all elevated in highest density compared with lowest density fractions (34.4 percent, p < 0.01; 34.6 percent, p < 0.05; 52.2 percent, p < 0.01; and 45.7 percent, p < 0.05, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Greater percentages of highest density fractions of lipoaspirate persist over time compared with lowest density fractions. A vasculogenic mechanism appears to contribute significantly, as highest density fractions contain more progenitor cells and increased concentrations of several vasculogenic mediators than lowest density fractions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23271517     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729cc6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  14 in total

Review 1.  Fat grafting and breast reconstruction: tips for ensuring predictability.

Authors:  Allen Gabriel; Manish C Champaneria; G Patrick Maxwell
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

Review 2.  Fat Processing Techniques: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Yan Lin; Yan Yang; Dali Mu
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 3.  The Science of Fat Grafting.

Authors:  Linden Shih; Matthew J Davis; Sebastian J Winocour
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 4.  Fat Processing Techniques.

Authors:  Erica Y Xue; Luciana Narvaez; Carrie K Chu; Summer E Hanson
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 5.  Fat Grafting for Facial Rejuvenation.

Authors:  Kelly P Schultz; Anjali Raghuram; Matthew J Davis; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Edward Chamata; Rod J Rohrich
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  Adipogenic factor-loaded microspheres increase retention of transplanted adipose tissue.

Authors:  Arta Kelmendi-Doko; Kacey G Marra; Natasa Vidic; Huaping Tan; J Peter Rubin
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Autologous fat grafting in facial volumetric restoration.

Authors:  Pasquale Piombino; Piombino Pasquale; Gaetano Marenzi; Marenzi Gaetano; Giovanni Dell'Aversana Orabona; Dell'Aversana Orabona Giovanni; Luigi Califano; Califano Luigi; Gilberto Sammartino; Sammartino Gilberto
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  A Comparison of Two Fat Grafting Methods on Operating Room Efficiency and Costs.

Authors:  Allen Gabriel; G Patrick Maxwell; Leah Griffin; Manish C Champaneria; Mousam Parekh; David Macarios
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.283

9.  Stem cell enriched lipotransfer reverses the effects of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Aurora Almadori; Michelle Griffin; Caroline M Ryan; Debbie F Hunt; Esther Hansen; Ravi Kumar; David J Abraham; Christopher P Denton; Peter E M Butler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The Current State of Fat Grafting: A Review of Harvesting, Processing, and Injection Techniques.

Authors:  Amy L Strong; Paul S Cederna; J Peter Rubin; Sydney R Coleman; Benjamin Levi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.