Literature DB >> 23271374

Yield of glyphosate-resistant sugar beets and efficiency of weed management systems with glyphosate and conventional herbicides under German and Polish crop production.

Henrike Nichterlein1, Anja Matzk, Leszek Kordas, Josef Kraus, Carsten Stibbe.   

Abstract

In sugar beet production, weed control is one of the most important and most expensive practices to ensure yield. Since glyphosate-resistant sugar beets are not yet approved for cultivation in the EU, little commercial experience exists with these sugar beets in Europe. Experimental field trials were conducted at five environments (Germany, Poland, 2010, 2011) to compare the effects of glyphosate with the effects of conventional weed control programs on the development of weeds, weed control efficiency and yield. The results show that the glyphosate weed control programs compared to the conventional methods decreased not only the number of herbicide applications but equally in magnitude decreased the dosage of active ingredients. The results also showed effective weed control with glyphosate when the weed covering was greater and sugar beets had a later growth stage of four true leaves. Glyphosate-resistant sugar beets applied with the glyphosate herbicide two or three times had an increase in white sugar yield from 4 to 18 % in comparison to the high dosage conventional herbicide systems. In summary, under glyphosate management sugar beets can positively contribute to the increasingly demanding requirements regarding efficient sugar beet cultivation and to the demands by society and politics to reduce the use of chemical plant protection products in the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23271374     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-012-9678-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  11 in total

1.  Crop management and agronomic context of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops.

Authors:  G T Champion; M J May; S Bennett; D R Brooks; S J Clark; R E Daniels; L G Firbank; A J Haughton; C Hawes; M S Heard; J N Perry; Z Randle; M J Rossall; P Rothery; M P Skellern; R J Scott; G R Squire; M R Thomas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. I. Soil-surface-active invertebrates.

Authors:  D R Brooks; D A Bohan; G T Champion; A J Haughton; C Hawes; M S Heard; S J Clark; A M Dewar; L G Firbank; J N Perry; P Rothery; R J Scott; I P Woiwod; C Birchall; M P Skellern; J H Walker; P Baker; D Bell; E L Browne; A J G Dewar; C M Fairfax; B H Garner; L A Haylock; S L Horne; S E Hulmes; N S Mason; L R Norton; P Nuttall; Z Randle; M J Rossall; R J N Sands; E J Singer; M J Walker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A novel approach to the use of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops for environmental benefit.

Authors:  Alan M Dewar; Mike J May; Ian P Woiwod; Lisa A Haylock; Gillian T Champion; Beulah H Garner; Richard J N Sands; Aiming Qi; John D Pidgeon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant sugar beet for spring and autumn environmental benefit.

Authors:  Mike J May; Gillian T Champion; Alan M Dewar; Aiming Qi; John D Pidgeon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Environmental and human health impacts of growing genetically modified herbicide-tolerant sugar beet: a life-cycle assessment.

Authors:  Richard Bennett; Richard Phipps; Alison Strange; Peter Grey
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 6.  Comparison of herbicide regimes and the associated potential environmental effects of glyphosate-resistant crops versus what they replace in Europe.

Authors:  Gijs A Kleter; Caroline Harris; Gerry Stephenson; John Unsworth
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.845

7.  The impact of the EU regulatory constraint of transgenic crops on farm income.

Authors:  Julian Park; Ian McFarlane; Richard Phipps; Graziano Ceddia
Journal:  N Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 5.079

8.  Impact of GM crops on biodiversity.

Authors:  Janet E Carpenter
Journal:  GM Crops       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar

9.  Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity.

Authors:  M S Heard; C Hawes; G T Champion; S J Clark; L G Firbank; A J Haughton; A M Parish; J N Perry; P Rothery; R J Scott; M P Skellern; G R Squire; M O Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods.

Authors:  A J Haughton; G T Champion; C Hawes; M S Heard; D R Brooks; D A Bohan; S J Clark; A M Dewar; L G Firbank; J L Osborne; J N Perry; P Rothery; D B Roy; R J Scott; I P Woiwod; C Birchall; M P Skellern; J H Walker; P Baker; E L Browne; A J G Dewar; B H Garner; L A Haylock; S L Horne; N S Mason; R J N Sands; M J Walker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.