Literature DB >> 23271322

Is power grasping contact continuous or discrete?

Todd C Pataky1, Greg P Slota, Mark L Latash, Vladimir M Zatsiorsky.   

Abstract

During power grasp, the number of local force maxima reflects either the central nervous system's preferential use of particular hand regions, or anatomical constraints, or both. Previously, both bimodal and trimodal force maxima have been hypothesized for power grasp of a cylindrical handle. Here we measure the number of local force maxima, with a resolution of 4.8°, when performing pushing and pulling efforts in the plane perpendicular to the cylinder's long axis. Twelve participants produced external forces to eight targets. The number of contacts was defined as the number of local maxima exceeding background variance. A minimum of four and a maximum of five discrete contacts were observed in all subjects at the distal phalanges and metacarpal heads. We thus reject previous hypotheses of bimodal or trimodal force control for cylindrical power grasping. Since we presently observed only 4-5 contacts, which is rather low considering the hand's kinematic flexibility in the flexion plane, we also reject hypotheses of continuous contact, which are inherent to current grasping taxonomy. A modification to current grasping taxonomy is proposed wherein power grasp contains separate branches for continuous and discrete contacts, and where power and precision grasps are distinguished only by grasp manipulability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23271322      PMCID: PMC4077902          DOI: 10.1123/jab.29.5.554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomech        ISSN: 1065-8483            Impact factor:   1.833


  10 in total

1.  Cortical activity in precision- versus power-grip tasks: an fMRI study.

Authors:  H H Ehrsson; A Fagergren; T Jonsson; G Westling; R S Johansson; H Forssberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The prehensile movements of the human hand.

Authors:  J R NAPIER
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1956-11

3.  A comparison of the grip force distribution in natural hands and in prosthetic hands.

Authors:  Artem Kargov; Christian Pylatiuk; Jan Martin; Stefan Schulz; Leonhard Döderlein
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Spatial resolution in plantar pressure measurement revisited.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The effect of torque direction and cylindrical handle diameter on the coupling between the hand and a cylindrical handle.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Thomas J Armstrong; James A Ashton-Miller; Don B Chaffin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Application of pressure mapping techniques to measure push and gripping forces with precision.

Authors:  P Lemerle; A Klinger; A Cristalli; M Geuder
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Development of a new dynamometer for measuring grip strength applied on a cylindrical handle.

Authors:  Bryan Wimer; Ren G Dong; Daniel E Welcome; Christopher Warren; Thomas W McDowell
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping in Python.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 1.763

9.  Spatial resolution in plantar pressure measurement.

Authors:  M Lord
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  Radial force distribution changes associated with tangential force production in cylindrical grasping, and the importance of anatomical registration.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky; Gregory P Slota; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.712

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Thumbs up: movements made by the thumb are smoother and larger than fingers in finger-thumb opposition tasks.

Authors:  Dhanush Rachaveti; Niranjan Chakrabhavi; Vaisakh Shankar; Varadhan Skm
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.