Literature DB >> 2327117

A model of methods for influencing prescribing: Part I. A review of prescribing models, persuasion theories, and administrative and educational methods.

D W Raisch1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this literature review is to develop a model of methods to be used to influence prescribing. Four bodies of literature were identified as being important for developing the model: (1) Theoretical prescribing models furnish information concerning factors that affect prescribing and how prescribing decisions are made. (2) Theories of persuasion provide insight into important components of educational communications. (3) Research articles of programs to improve prescribing identify types of programs that have been found to be successful. (4) Theories of human inference describe how judgments are formulated and identify errors in judgment that can play a role in prescribing. This review is presented in two parts. This article reviews prescribing models, theories of persuasion, studies of administrative programs to control prescribing, and sub-optimally designed studies of educational efforts to influence drug prescribing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2327117     DOI: 10.1177/106002809002400415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DICP        ISSN: 1042-9611


  7 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacoeconomic consequences of measurement and modification of hospital drug use.

Authors:  L L Ioannides-Demos; G M Eckert; A J McLean
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Drug utilisation studies as tools in health economics.

Authors:  J A Sacristán; J Soto
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Cost-related information to be provided by computerised drug-prescription systems to promote cost-effective prescribing.

Authors:  C Milstein; A Venot
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Prescribing of psychotropics in the elderly: why is it so often inappropriate?

Authors:  Jane R Mort; Rajender R Aparasu
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Attitudes of general practitioners in New Zealand to pharmaceutical representatives.

Authors:  A N Thomson; B J Craig; P M Barham
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Choosing between apples and apples: physicians' choices of prescription drugs that have similar side effects and efficacies.

Authors:  K T Safavi; R A Hayward
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Risk of opioid misuse in people with cancer and pain and related clinical considerations: a qualitative study of the perspectives of Australian general practitioners.

Authors:  Tim Luckett; Toby Newton-John; Jane Phillips; Simon Holliday; Karleen Giannitrapani; Gawaine Powell-Davies; Melanie Lovell; Winston Liauw; Debra Rowett; Sallie-Anne Pearson; Bronwyn Raymond; Nicole Heneka; Karl Lorenz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.