Literature DB >> 23270696

Estimating trace-suspect match probabilities for singleton Y-STR haplotypes using coalescent theory.

Mikkel Meyer Andersen1, Amke Caliebe, Arne Jochens, Sascha Willuweit, Michael Krawczak.   

Abstract

Estimation of match probabilities for singleton haplotypes of lineage markers, i.e. for haplotypes observed only once in a reference database augmented by a suspect profile, is an important problem in forensic genetics. We compared the performance of four estimators of singleton match probabilities for Y-STRs, namely the count estimate, both with and without Brenner's so-called 'kappa correction', the surveying estimate, and a previously proposed, but rarely used, coalescent-based approach implemented in the BATWING software. Extensive simulation with BATWING of the underlying population history, haplotype evolution and subsequent database sampling revealed that the coalescent-based approach is characterized by lower bias and lower mean squared error than the uncorrected count estimator and the surveying estimator. Moreover, in contrast to the two count estimators, both the surveying and the coalescent-based approach exhibited a good correlation between the estimated and true match probabilities. However, although its overall performance is thus better than that of any other recognized method, the coalescent-based estimator is still computation-intense on the verge of general impracticability. Its application in forensic practice therefore will have to be limited to small reference databases, or to isolated cases of particular interest, until more powerful algorithms for coalescent simulation have become available.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23270696     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  6 in total

1.  The combined evidential value of autosomal and Y-chromosomal DNA profiles obtained from the same sample.

Authors:  Jacob de Zoete; Marjan Sjerps; Ronald Meester; Eric Cator
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 2.  Assessing the Forensic Value of DNA Evidence from Y Chromosomes and Mitogenomes.

Authors:  Mikkel M Andersen; David J Balding
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 3.  Forensic use of Y-chromosome DNA: a general overview.

Authors:  Manfred Kayser
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  How convincing is a matching Y-chromosome profile?

Authors:  Mikkel M Andersen; David J Balding
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Comparison of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Software for the Evolutionary Analysis of Y-Chromosomal Microsatellite Data.

Authors:  Sven Gundlach; Olaf Junge; Lars Wienbrandt; Michael Krawczak; Amke Caliebe
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 7.271

6.  DNA fingerprinting in forensics: past, present, future.

Authors:  Lutz Roewer
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2013-11-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.