Literature DB >> 23270528

Merkel cell polyomavirus and trichodysplasia spinulosa-associated polyomavirus DNAs and antibodies in blood among the elderly.

Mohammadreza Sadeghi1, Matti Aronen, Tingting Chen, Laura Jartti, Tuomas Jartti, Olli Ruuskanen, Maria Söderlund-Venermo, Klaus Hedman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) and trichodysplasia spinulosa-associated polyomavirus (TSPyV) are recently found pathogens causing two rare skin disorders, Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) and trichodysplasia spinulosa (TS). MCC is proportionally common in the elderly and most often is associated with immunosuppression. TS is a folliculocentric infection seen in patients in an immunocompromised state. Little or no baseline information exists, however, on the prevalences of these two viruses among the elderly. Epidemiologic data on this population could help in understanding their natural biology. We wished to determine the occurrences and blood levels of MCPyV and TSPyV DNAs among the elderly and any association between the prevalences of their corresponding antiviral IgG antibodies.
METHODS: From 394 hospitalized elderly individuals (age ≥65 years) with respiratory symptoms, cardiovascular, and other diseases, we studied 621 serum samples by four different real-time quantitative (q) PCRs, two for the DNAs of MCPyV and two for TSPyV. The IgG antibodies for both viruses among 481 serum samples of 326 subjects were measured with enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), using as antigen recombinant virus-like particles (VLPs).
RESULTS: Of the 394 patients, 39 (9.9%) were positive at least once for MCPyV DNA by the LT PCR, and 33 (8.4%) by the VP1 PCR, while 6 (1.5%) were positive by both PCR assays. In general, the viral DNA copy numbers were low. In sharp contrast, no TSPyV DNA was detectable with qPCRs for the corresponding genomic regions. The IgG seroprevalence of MCPyV was 59.6% and of TSPyV, 67.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: MCPyV DNA, unlike TSPyV DNA, occurs in low copy number in serum samples from a notable proportion of aging individuals. Whether this reflects enhanced viral replication possibly due to waning immune surveillance, and is associated with increased MCC risk, deserves exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23270528      PMCID: PMC3560236          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Infect Dis        ISSN: 1471-2334            Impact factor:   3.090


Background

Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) causes Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) [1], an aggressive skin cancer that is highly unusual before age 50 [2,3]. The elderly, immunosuppressed individuals and post-transplant patients, and Caucasians exposed to excessive UV light, are at increased risk [4,5]. MCPyV infection, defined by serology or detection of viral DNA, is prevalent [6-10]. The presence of MCPyV DNA at high copy number and tumor-specific mutations in MCPyV genomes appear in tumor tissue but not in healthy tissue [11]. Interestingly, similar truncating mutations have been described in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [12]. Ubiquitous presence of MCPyV DNA has become apparent in cutaneous swabs from clinically healthy subjects at prevalences of 40 to 60% [13,14]. Besides in skin, viral DNA has been detected at lower frequencies also in respiratory secretions, on the oral and anogenital mucosa, and in the digestive tract [9]. Furthermore, by examining fetal autopsy samples, we obtained data to rule out MCPyV vertical transmission [15]. Therefore, the exact mode of transmission remains to be elucidated and could involve cutaneous, fecal-oral, mucosal, or respiratory routes. Moreover, the presence of the MCPyV genome has also been reported in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from adult HIV/AIDS patients without MCC and from healthy blood donors at low DNA copy numbers [16,17]. Among healthy subjects, MCPyV exposure as measured by serum antibodies to viral capsid proteins appears to be wide [18,19]. Tolstov et al. showed seroprevalences of 43% among children aged 2 to 5 years, and 80% among adults older than 50 [18]. We and others also observed frequent primary exposure to MCPyV during childhood and a trend toward increasing seroprevalence among adults [20,21]. Trichodysplasia spinulosa-associated polyomavirus (TSPyV), the eighth human polyomavirus, was detected by rolling circle amplification (RCA) after the identification of human polyomaviruses 6 and 7 in 2010 [14,22]. Trichodysplasia spinulosa (TS) is a rare, disfiguring skin condition that affects immunocompromised solid organ transplant patients and lymphocytic leukemia patients, universally involving the central face [23-25]. Its discoverers further showed the presence of TSPyV DNA in eyebrow hairs of 4% of 69 renal transplant patients without TS and a lack of TSPyV DNA in human pilomatricomas [22,26]. High prevalence (100%) and load (∼106 copies/cell), of TSPyV DNA in TS lesions, and abundant expression of TSPyV VP1 in the affected hair follicle cells evidenced that active TSPyV infection is associated with TS and apparently essential in its pathogenesis [27]. Two recent serology studies showed that TSPyV circulates widely in the human population (prevalences of 10% in small children to 80% in adults), and primary exposure is extensive in childhood, beginning at age 1 or 2 years [28,29]. TSPyV positivity of nasopharyngeal and fecal samples from an immunosuppressed child (heart transplant recipient) without TS suggests respiratory or fecal–oral route of transmission [30]. Data regarding MCPyV, TSPyV and aging are scarce. Additional epidemiological deta on elderly persons, regarding serum antibody responses and genome prevalence is needed. To our knowledge the present collection of sera is the first sizeable material that has been studied for the presence of MCPyV and TSPyV in aging individuals in order to determine whether and to what extent these viruses appear in this population at elevated risk of MCC. We studied a large number of serum samples from aging (≥65 years) representatives of the general population by real-time quantitative (q) PCRs for the DNAs of MCPyV and TSPyV by using primer sets directed against the genes encoding large-T antigen 1 (LT1) and viral protein 1 (VP1). In addition, the IgG antibodies for the two viruses were measured with EIAs by using as an antigen the corresponding VP1 virus-like particles (VLPs).

Methods

Study populations

For determination of MC and TS polyomavirus DNAs and IgG antibody seroprevalences, 621 blood samples were collected from 394 hospitalized senior citizens with respiratory symptoms or suspected pneumonia, cardiovascular, and other diseases in the city hospital of Turku, Finland, between July 2007 and April 2009. The criteria for sampling were age 65 years or older, disease requiring hospitalization, and a written assignment from the patient or trustee. Patients who came for a short elective operation were excluded from the study. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Turku University Hospital.

Sample collection

Eligible patients were informed of this study at hospital entry. After signing the consent, the patients or trustees were interviewed, and hospital records reviewed for clinical history. Nasopharyngeal swab samples (flocked swab, 520CS01, Copan, Brescia, Italy) and serum samples were collected at hospital entry and after two weeks or at discharge for detection of acute infections. The swabs in dry tubes and serum samples were stored at -80°C. Disposable gloves were used to prevent contamination.

DNA extraction

The DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Crawley, UK) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions for nucleic-acid extraction. A negative control of molecular biology-grade water was extracted and included in the PCR between sets of 10 samples. MCPyV DNA is known to occur on virtually all environmental surfaces that have been in contact with human skin [31]. During sample processing, in addition to routine PCR precautions, we always wore double disposable gloves and frequently changed them as well as avoided touching anything except pipettes and used aliquoted reagents.

Real-time PCR assay for detection of MCPyV and TSPyV

Two published primer sets targeting conserved sequences in the MCPyV genome, the large T antigen (LT) gene, and the viral capsid protein (VP1) gene (Table 1) were used according to Goh et al [32]. PCR was done with the ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector (Applied Biosystems) thermal cycler using the TaqMan universal PCR master mix (PE Applied Biosystems), and the settings were 52°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 60°C (LT assay) or 58°C (VP1 assay) for 1 min. For both assays, control plasmids were cloned from amplicons of PCR-positive tonsillar samples [33] by means of the CloneJET™ PCR Cloning Kit (Thermo Scientific). Serial dilutions of the plasmids allowed determination of assay sensitivity. In each assay, five copies per reaction were reproducibly positive, corresponding to 200 copies/mL of serum. For contamination control, in addition to DNA extraction controls, we included 30 controls of molecular biology-grade water per run of 54 DNA extractions. The MCPyV qPCR products were purified for automated sequencing with the High Pure PCR product purification kit (Roche). The resulting DNA sequences were aligned by means of the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) against the MCPyV sequences in GenBank.
Table 1

Primers and probes used to detect TSPyV and MCPyV

VirusPrimers & probes sequence (5-->3)RegionAmplicon size
MCPyV
FWD-CCACAGCCAGAGCTCTTCCT
LT
140
REV-TGGTGGTCTCCTCTCTGCTACTG
FAM-TCCTTCTCAGCGTCCCAGGCTTCA-TAMRA
MCPyV
FWD-TGCCTCCCACATCTGCAAT
VP1
59
REV-GTGTCTCTGCCAATGCTAAATGA
6FAM-TGTCACAGGTAATATC-MGBNFQ
TSPyV
FWD-TGTGTTTGGAAACCAGAATCATTTG
LT
140
REV-TGCTACCTTGCTATTAAATGTGGAG
FAM-TTCTTCTTCCTCCTCATCCTCCACCTCAAT-BHQ1
TSPyV
FWD-AGTCTAAGGACAACTATGGTTACAG
VP1
140
REV-ATTACAGGTTAGGTCCTCATTCAAC
FAM-ACAGCAGTGACCAGGACAAGCCTACTTCTG-BHQ1
Tail SequenceAACTGACTAAACTAGGTGCCACGTCGTGAAAGTCTGACAAGTGTCTCTGCCAA TGCTAAATGA
Primers and probes used to detect TSPyV and MCPyV As the MCPyV VP1 PCR product was too short for direct sequencing, we added a 40 base pairs (bp) nonspecific nucleotide tail [34] (Table 1) in addition to a poly(C) to the 5′ end of the sequencing primers to accomplish a product of 110 bp. The neutral sequence is a randomly generated sequence not matching any sequence in a BLAST search. For detection of TSPyV, we applied published qPCRs, with primer pairs targeting the VP1 and LT genes [22] but changed the quenching dye TAMRA to BHQ1 on the 3′ base of the probes (Table 1). While annealing was done for 15 s at 62°C, the cycling conditions were otherwise identical to those of the MCPyV protocol. For use as positive controls and to determine assay sensitivities due to the lack of known positive samples, the TSPyV LT and VP regions were synthesized and cloned into pUC57 by GenScript (Piscataway, NJ, USA). The detection limit of each assay was 5 target copies per reaction, corresponding to 200 copies/mL of serum.

MCPyV and TSPyV serology

MCPyV and TSPyV IgG antibodies in 481 serum samples from 326 subjects (available from the initial 621 samples from 394 subjects) were measured by in-house enzyme immunoassays (EIA) based on virus protein 1 (VP1) virus-like particles (VLPs) showing no antigenic cross-reactivity between the two viruses [21,29]. Briefly, recombinant baculovirus genomes containing the MCPyV and TSPyV VP1 gene sequence were generated by using the Bac-to-Bac expression system in S. frugiperda (Sf) 9 insect cells. The VLPs were biotinylated and used as antigens in an indirect EIA assay, as described [21,29]. The cut off values defining a positive IgG result were 0.150 and 0.240 OD units at 492 nm for MCPyV and TSPyV, respectively [21,29].

Results

Patient characteristics

The median age of the 394 patients was 82 years (range 65 to 100), and from those 226 (57%) were female. Sera tested in this study were from three groups of patients; Group I consisted of 111 serum samples obtained from patients with respiratory disease (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, other lung disease). Group II included 209 serum samples from patients with cardiovascular disease (stroke, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, heart failure, heart dysrhythmia). Group III included 301 samples from patients with other diseases (hypertension, cancer, depression, dementia, rheumatic disease) (Table 2).
Table 2

Associations between patient characteristics and MCPyV LT1 and VP1 DNA positivity

Disease groupSample number4MCPyV VP1 odds ratio (95% confidence interval)5MCPyV LT1 odds ratio (95% confidence interval)
Respiratory disease1
111
2.40 (1.13 – 5.11)
0.630 (0.277 – 1.435)
Cardiovasevular disease2
209
0.57 (0.27 – 1.21)
1.348 (0.638 – 2.850)
Other disease33010.47 (0.19 – 1.12)1.129 (0.418 – 3.048)

Logistic regression analyses, the reference groups were those without respiratory, cardiovascular, or other diseases respectively.

1Respiratory disease = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, other lung disease.

2Cardiovascular disease = stroke, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, heart failure, heart dysrhythmia.

3Other disease = hypertension, cancer, depression, dementia, rheumatic disease.

4MCPyV VP1 =Merkel cell polyomavirus viral protein 1.

5MCPyV LT1 =Merkel cell polyomavirus Large T Antigen1.

Associations between patient characteristics and MCPyV LT1 and VP1 DNA positivity Logistic regression analyses, the reference groups were those without respiratory, cardiovascular, or other diseases respectively. 1Respiratory disease = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, other lung disease. 2Cardiovascular disease = stroke, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, heart failure, heart dysrhythmia. 3Other disease = hypertension, cancer, depression, dementia, rheumatic disease. 4MCPyV VP1 =Merkel cell polyomavirus viral protein 1. 5MCPyV LT1 =Merkel cell polyomavirus Large T Antigen1.

MCPyV and TSPyV qPCR

MCPyV DNA detection by using qPCR for 621 serum samples of the 394 patients produced 72 positive results; 39 (9.9%) patients were positive by the LT assay, 33 (8.4%) by the VP1 assay, and 6 (1.5%) by both assays (Table 3). Concerning all these numbers, a positive result had been obtained at least twice upon reproduction. The 72 patients that were PCR positive for either LT or VP had very high C values (average C values LT/VP1 = 38.67/39.78), as did the six patients sera that were positive with both PCRs (average C values LT/VP1 = 37.08/37.18), indicating low viral loads. qPCR displayed C values in the 35.88 – 40 and 36.18 – 40 ranges for LT and VP assays, respectively. One-fifth of the PCR products were sequenced (13 of the LT gene and 12 of the VP1 gene). All were confirmed to be MCPyV and showed a 100% identity to each other and also to those of the previously described MCPyV strain sequences with no deletions or other mutations. The serum samples were also tested with the corresponding TSPyV qPCRs. No TSPyV DNA was emerged in any subject.
Table 3

Age distribution of MCPyV infected patients

Age group (years)No. of sample testedMCPyV Positive patients % (VP1)MCPyV Positive patients % (LT1)
60-70
36
0.4
0.0
71-80
174
4.0
6.3
81-90
307
7.1
7.5
91-100
104
3.8
4.8
Total6218.49.9
Age distribution of MCPyV infected patients

Associations between clinical characteristics and MCPyV DNA positivity

When we examined the association between MCPyV-DNA positivity in serum and clinical characteristics (Table 2), VP1-PCR positivity was significantly and positively associated with chronic respiratory disease (p = 0.023, Table 2). Univariable logistic regression was used to analyse the association between patient characteristics and virus etiology. Statistical significance was established at the level of P < 0.05. For statistics SAS Enterprise Guide 4.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used. No associations appeared between LT1-PCR positivity and clinical condition. In addition, we examined by VLP-EIAs 481 corresponding serum samples from 326 elderly patients for MCPyV and TSPyV IgG antibodies. Of the 481 available sera 171 were single without follow-up sample. The IgG seroprevalence of 326 patients for MCPyV was 59.6%, and for TSPyV, 67.3%. These seroprevalences did not significantly change with increasing age (Figure 1) and we found no significant correlation between antibody levels and increasing age. Antibody titres in assays based on VLPs of MCPyV showed no correlation to the titres in similar TSPyV assays. With only two exceptions among 326 individuals, the antibody levels were almost identical in follow-up sera taken two weeks apart, ruling against recent immunogenic infections with MCPyV or TSPyV. Among the 72 MCPyV PCR positive patients 15 were MCPyV VP1 IgG negative.
Figure 1

Age-dependent prevalences of MCPyV and TSPyV antibodies. Both MCPyV and TSPyV seroprevalences are very similar in all age groups of the elderly.

Age-dependent prevalences of MCPyV and TSPyV antibodies. Both MCPyV and TSPyV seroprevalences are very similar in all age groups of the elderly.

Associations between clinical characteristics and seroprevalence

Associations between seroprevalence and the diseases were calculated from clinical data available for 326 patients. The MCPyV IgG seroprevalence in the respiratory disease group was not higher than in the group without respiratory disease, OR 1.316 (0.793 – 2.182). In cardiovascular disease group the TSPyV IgG seroprecalence was lower than in a group without cardiovascular disease, OR 0.559 (0.321 – 0.973). No other associations were found. In the logistic regression analyses, the reference groups were those without respiratory, cardiovascular, or other diseases respectively.

Discussion

Our results show the occurrence of MCPyV DNA rather commonly in sera from the elderly. The source of viral DNA in their blood is unknown. As the previously identified polyomaviruses JCV and BKV do occur at increased frequencies in blood and lymphoid tissue during host immunosuppression, and the same has been reported in some studies for the newly discovered KIPyV and WUPyV [35-37], it is tempting to speculate that with increasing age MCPyV may reactivate more often, causing viremia, especially as hematolymphoid cells may harbour MCPyV [38]. The potential in elderly individuals for MCPyV to replicate and be released into serum under special circumstances deserves further investigation. A study of 840 serum samples for MCPyV revealed only one sample from a leukemic child to be PCR-positive; more often viral DNA was detected in tonsillar tissue of adults [33]. In a study of 635 NPA samples with exactly the same primers and probes as ours, more adults (particularly the elderly) than children were MCPyV positive [32]. Our high prevalence of MCPyV DNA among the elderly is in agreement with the findings of Goh et al. showing in NPAs MCPyV DNA more frequently among the elderly [32]. As in several other studies, viral DNA was detectable in low copy numbers, however, making the interpretation of positive results challenging [17,32,39,40]. According to others’ positivity criteria concerning VP1 and LT PCRs [32,39,40], we concluded six samples as being unequivocally positive for MCPyV. However, all 25 amplicons from the LT or VP PCRs contained the correct sequence, and the 437 negative controls (62 for DNA extraction plus 375 for qPCR) were always negative, suggesting that also the single-PCR positives were true positives. Divergent sequences among the circulating viruses could perhaps cause false negativity in the PCRs, or the low viral amounts could lead to stochastic variance in detection. Among the 72 MCPyV PCR-positive patients 15 were MCPyV VP1 IgG negative. One possible explanation for this difference, in light of the ubiquitous presence of MCPyV DNA in superficial skin, is contamination of the needle piercing the skin during sampling. This deserves to be explored. Of note, MCPyV detection rates by LT1, LT3, and VP1-region primers have invariably shown mutual discordance among samples of various entities [1,32,39,40]. We used primers from both the VP1 and LT regions of MCPyV and reasoned that the presence of both genes, capsid VP1 and oncogenic LT, would better indicate the presence of infectious virions, hence the stringent criterion of coupled LT and VP1 positivity for MCPyV detection by these assays. Interestingly, we found a positive association between MCPyV VP1-PCR but not LT1-PCR positivity and chronic respiratory disease. However, any conclusions about MCPyV pathogenicity in the respiratory tract cannot be drawn without epidemiologic support and further investigation with different sample types. Furthermore, it is difficult to resolve whether the higher prevalence by the VP1 assay was due to increased sensitivity or to a difference in genome identity sequences among the MCPyV strains. The prevalence of MCPyV antibody positivity increases with age throughout life [18-21,41,42]. Our MCPyV serology results also showed that the majority of the elderly have been exposed to MCPyV with similar seroprevalences in all subgroups. Taken together, MCPyV DNA appeared in serum in low copy numbers in many aging individuals. Serological results have shown that MCPyV infection is common, but only rarely leads to MCC. The presence of the virus alone is insufficient for tumor development. While MCC tumors require specific mutations (both T antigen truncation and genomic integration) [1], and in most cases immunosuppression, additional risk factors and viral changes are required before clinically apparent MCC emerges. TSPyV is a ubiquitous virus that frequently infects the general population. To determine the exposure history and activity of infection among the aging, we conducted a survey by molecular and serologic tests. In contrast to MCPyV, no TSPyV DNA appeared in the elderly subjects’ sera. For one explanation of these negative PCR findings, TSPyV viremia may be of short duration. Whether TSPyV infections are able to persist is unknown, but likely, based on results for other polyomavirus infections. Our TSPyV IgG data confirmed two recent serologic reports showing TSPyV circulation in the general population [28,29]. The seroprevalence we found for TSPyV among the elderly was high (>60%) with no variation according to advancing age, and comparable with that for MCPyV.

Conclusions

These results indicate that MCPyV DNA, unlike TSPyV DNA, occurs in low copy numbers in serum in a notable proportion of aging individuals. Whether the enhanced viral replication in our elderly participants is a reflection of waning immune surveillance and is correlated with increased MCC risk deserves exploration. Antibodies against MCPyV and TSPyV occurred at high rates in serum samples from the elderly.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MS carried out the molecular and serological studies and drafted the manuscript. MA, LJ, TJ, and OR provided the study materials. TC produced the recombinant VLPS and participated in the serological study. MS-V and KH designed, coordinated, and participated in writing the manuscript. All authors read, revised, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/12/383/prepub
  42 in total

1.  Serological evidence of Merkel cell polyomavirus primary infections in childhood.

Authors:  Tingting Chen; Lea Hedman; Petri S Mattila; Tuomas Jartti; Olli Ruuskanen; Maria Söderlund-Venermo; Klaus Hedman
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.168

2.  Absence of the trichodysplasia spinulosa-associated polyomavirus in human pilomatricomas.

Authors:  Jean Kanitakis; Siamaque Kazem; Els Van Der Meijden; Mariet Feltkamp
Journal:  Eur J Dermatol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.328

3.  Detection of Merkel cell polyomavirus on environmental surfaces.

Authors:  Vincent Foulongne; Valérie Courgnaud; William Champeau; Michel Segondy
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.327

4.  Generation of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV)-like particles and their application to detection of MCV antibodies.

Authors:  Antoine Touzé; Julien Gaitan; Françoise Arnold; Raphaël Cazal; Maxime J Fleury; Nicolas Combelas; Pierre-Yves Sizaret; Serge Guyetant; Annabel Maruani; Marc Baay; Mauro Tognon; Pierre Coursaget
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Virus-associated trichodysplasia spinulosa.

Authors:  Angela J Wyatt; Dana L Sachs; Jinru Shia; Ruby Delgado; Klaus J Busam
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Huichen Feng; Masahiro Shuda; Yuan Chang; Patrick S Moore
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Quantitation of human seroresponsiveness to Merkel cell polyomavirus.

Authors:  Diana V Pastrana; Yanis L Tolstov; Jürgen C Becker; Patrick S Moore; Yuan Chang; Christopher B Buck
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  Reactivation and mutation of newly discovered WU, KI, and Merkel cell carcinoma polyomaviruses in immunosuppressed individuals.

Authors:  Colin P Sharp; Päivi Norja; Iain Anthony; Jeanne E Bell; Peter Simmonds
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 9.  KI, WU and Merkel cell polyomaviruses: a new era for human polyomavirus research.

Authors:  Tina Dalianis; Torbjörn Ramqvist; Kalle Andreasson; Jaime M Kean; Robert L Garcea
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 15.707

10.  Seroepidemiology of human polyomaviruses.

Authors:  Jaime M Kean; Suchitra Rao; Michael Wang; Robert L Garcea
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 6.823

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Beyond Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus: a Review of Viruses Composing the Blood Virome of Solid Organ Transplant and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Marie-Céline Zanella; Samuel Cordey; Laurent Kaiser
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Frequent and abundant Merkel cell polyomavirus detection in urban wastewaters in Italy.

Authors:  P Di Bonito; S Della Libera; S Petricca; M Iaconelli; L Accardi; M Muscillo; G La Rosa
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Detection of trichodysplasia spinulosa-associated polyomavirus in a fatal case of myocarditis in a seven-month-old girl.

Authors:  Shinya Tsuzuki; Hitomi Fukumoto; Sohtaro Mine; Noriko Sato; Makoto Mochizuki; Hideki Hasegawa; Tsuyoshi Sekizuka; Makoto Kuroda; Takeji Matsushita; Harutaka Katano
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-07-15

4.  Multiplex detection in tonsillar tissue of all known human polyomaviruses.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Sadeghi; Yilin Wang; Torbjörn Ramqvist; Leena-Maija Aaltonen; Lari Pyöriä; Mari Toppinen; Maria Söderlund-Venermo; Klaus Hedman
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Prevalence of DNA of fourteen human polyomaviruses determined in blood donors.

Authors:  Sergio Kamminga; Els van der Meijden; Caroline de Brouwer; Mariet Feltkamp; Hans Zaaijer
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Decreased IgG Antibody Response to Viral Protein Mimotopes of Oncogenic Merkel Cell Polyomavirus in Sera From Healthy Elderly Subjects.

Authors:  Chiara Mazziotta; Carmen Lanzillotti; Marcello Govoni; Giulia Pellielo; Elisa Mazzoni; Mauro Tognon; Fernanda Martini; John Charles Rotondo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 7.  Human polyomavirus reactivation: disease pathogenesis and treatment approaches.

Authors:  Cillian F De Gascun; Michael J Carr
Journal:  Clin Dev Immunol       Date:  2013-05-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.