Ying-peng Xu1, Li-min Xie, Wen-yue Wang. 1. Orthopedics Department of Guang'anmen Hospital, Chinese Academic of Traditional Chinese Medicine Science, Beijing 100053, China. xuyingpeng@msn.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of the external use of tradition Chinese medicine (TCM) in treating knee osteoarthritis. METHOD: By computer retrieval of MEDLINE, CNKI and VIP database on data from the establishment of database to May 2011,all of the randomized controlled trials on the external use of TCMs in treating knee osteoarthritis with western medicines as the control drugs were collected to screen out literatures in line with the inclusion standards. The quality of the included literatures was strictly assessed, and a meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.1 software. RESULT: Totally 25 RCTs involving 2 159 patients were included [1152 patients in the TCM group (TCMG), 1007 patients in the western medicine group (WMG)], in which 21 articles were brought into the analysis on efficacy. The results of meta-analyses showed that the efficient rates of the TCMG and the WMG were 92.35% (941/ 1019) and 81.19% (712/877), respectively, OR = 2.88 [2.16-3.83], with a hypothesis testing on total effect of Z = 7.20 (P < 0.00001)], suggesting that the external use of TCMs had a better efficacy than the WMG. A total of 25 literatures were brought into the analysis on adverse effect. The adverse effects rate of the TCMG and the WMG were 1.30% (15/1 152) and 5.36% (54/1007), respectively, OR = 0.40 [0.11-1.38], Z = 1.46 (P = 0.15)], indicating no significant difference between them. The sub group analysis shows that compared with the external use of western medicines,the adverse effect rate of the two groups are similar [(1.87% (11/589): 1.60% (9/564)], OR = l.12 [0.48-2.58], Z = 0.26 (P = 0.80). But as for inhibitors NSAIDS and COX-2 for oral,the adverse effect rate of the TCMG was lower than that of the WMG [(1.07% (4/375): 15.46% (45/291)], OR = 0.11 [0.01-0.87], Z = 2.09 (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of the external use of TCMs in treating OA is better than that of western medicines. The adverse effect rates of the external use of TCMs is equivalent to that of western medicines, and significantly lower than that of oral western medicines. But because of the poor quality of the included literatures, the final conclusion for the efficacy of TCMs in treating knee osteoarthritis could not be reached only based on this Meta-analysis and remain to be proved with the results of high-quality clinical studies.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of the external use of tradition Chinese medicine (TCM) in treating knee osteoarthritis. METHOD: By computer retrieval of MEDLINE, CNKI and VIP database on data from the establishment of database to May 2011,all of the randomized controlled trials on the external use of TCMs in treating knee osteoarthritis with western medicines as the control drugs were collected to screen out literatures in line with the inclusion standards. The quality of the included literatures was strictly assessed, and a meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.1 software. RESULT: Totally 25 RCTs involving 2 159 patients were included [1152 patients in the TCM group (TCMG), 1007 patients in the western medicine group (WMG)], in which 21 articles were brought into the analysis on efficacy. The results of meta-analyses showed that the efficient rates of the TCMG and the WMG were 92.35% (941/ 1019) and 81.19% (712/877), respectively, OR = 2.88 [2.16-3.83], with a hypothesis testing on total effect of Z = 7.20 (P < 0.00001)], suggesting that the external use of TCMs had a better efficacy than the WMG. A total of 25 literatures were brought into the analysis on adverse effect. The adverse effects rate of the TCMG and the WMG were 1.30% (15/1 152) and 5.36% (54/1007), respectively, OR = 0.40 [0.11-1.38], Z = 1.46 (P = 0.15)], indicating no significant difference between them. The sub group analysis shows that compared with the external use of western medicines,the adverse effect rate of the two groups are similar [(1.87% (11/589): 1.60% (9/564)], OR = l.12 [0.48-2.58], Z = 0.26 (P = 0.80). But as for inhibitors NSAIDS and COX-2 for oral,the adverse effect rate of the TCMG was lower than that of the WMG [(1.07% (4/375): 15.46% (45/291)], OR = 0.11 [0.01-0.87], Z = 2.09 (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of the external use of TCMs in treating OA is better than that of western medicines. The adverse effect rates of the external use of TCMs is equivalent to that of western medicines, and significantly lower than that of oral western medicines. But because of the poor quality of the included literatures, the final conclusion for the efficacy of TCMs in treating knee osteoarthritis could not be reached only based on this Meta-analysis and remain to be proved with the results of high-quality clinical studies.