OBJECTIVE: Presently there is no clinically feasible imaging modality that can effectively detect cortical demyelination in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this study is to determine if clinically feasible magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) imaging is sensitive to cortical demyelination in MS. METHODS: MRI were acquired in situ on 7 recently deceased patients with MS using clinically feasible sequences at 3 T, including relatively high-resolution T1-weighted and proton density-weighted images with/without a magnetization transfer pulse for calculation of MTR. The brains were rapidly removed and placed in fixative. Multiple cortical regions from each brain were immunostained for myelin proteolipid protein and classified as mostly myelinated (MM(ctx)), mostly demyelinated (MD(ctx)), or intermediately demyelinated (ID(ctx)). MRIs were registered with the cortical sections so that the cortex corresponding to each cortical section could be identified, along with adjacent subcortical white matter (WM). Mean cortical MTR normalized to mean WM MTR was calculated for each cortical region. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test if mean normalized cortical MTR was significantly lower in demyelinated cortex. RESULTS: We found that mean normalized cortical MTR was significantly lower in cortical tissue with any demyelination (ID(ctx) or MD(ctx)) compared to MM(ctx) (demyelinated cortex: least-squares mean [LSM] = 0.797, SE = 0.007; MM(ctx): LSM = 0.837, SE = 0.006; p = 0.01, n = 89). CONCLUSIONS: This result demonstrates that clinically feasible MTR imaging is sensitive to cortical demyelination and suggests that MTR will be a useful tool to help detect MS cortical lesions in living patients with MS.
OBJECTIVE: Presently there is no clinically feasible imaging modality that can effectively detect cortical demyelination in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this study is to determine if clinically feasible magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) imaging is sensitive to cortical demyelination in MS. METHODS: MRI were acquired in situ on 7 recently deceased patients with MS using clinically feasible sequences at 3 T, including relatively high-resolution T1-weighted and proton density-weighted images with/without a magnetization transfer pulse for calculation of MTR. The brains were rapidly removed and placed in fixative. Multiple cortical regions from each brain were immunostained for myelin proteolipid protein and classified as mostly myelinated (MM(ctx)), mostly demyelinated (MD(ctx)), or intermediately demyelinated (ID(ctx)). MRIs were registered with the cortical sections so that the cortex corresponding to each cortical section could be identified, along with adjacent subcortical white matter (WM). Mean cortical MTR normalized to mean WM MTR was calculated for each cortical region. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test if mean normalized cortical MTR was significantly lower in demyelinated cortex. RESULTS: We found that mean normalized cortical MTR was significantly lower in cortical tissue with any demyelination (ID(ctx) or MD(ctx)) compared to MM(ctx) (demyelinated cortex: least-squares mean [LSM] = 0.797, SE = 0.007; MM(ctx): LSM = 0.837, SE = 0.006; p = 0.01, n = 89). CONCLUSIONS: This result demonstrates that clinically feasible MTR imaging is sensitive to cortical demyelination and suggests that MTR will be a useful tool to help detect MS cortical lesions in living patients with MS.
Authors: Alexandra Seewann; Hugo Vrenken; Evert-Jan Kooi; Paul van der Valk; Dirk L Knol; Chris H Polman; Petra J W Pouwels; Frederik Barkhof; Jeroen J G Geurts Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: A Seewann; E-J Kooi; S D Roosendaal; P J W Pouwels; M P Wattjes; P van der Valk; F Barkhof; C H Polman; J J G Geurts Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Claudia F Lucchinetti; Bogdan F G Popescu; Reem F Bunyan; Natalia M Moll; Shanu F Roemer; Hans Lassmann; Wolfgang Brück; Joseph E Parisi; Bernd W Scheithauer; Caterina Giannini; Stephen D Weigand; Jay Mandrekar; Richard M Ransohoff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Klaus Schmierer; Harold G Parkes; Po-Wah So; Shu F An; Sebastian Brandner; Roger J Ordidge; Tarek A Yousry; David H Miller Journal: Brain Date: 2010-01-31 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Elizabeth Fisher; Ansi Chang; Robert J Fox; Jean A Tkach; Therese Svarovsky; Kunio Nakamura; Richard A Rudick; Bruce D Trapp Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Lars Bø; Christian A Vedeler; Harald I Nyland; Bruce D Trapp; Sverre J Mørk Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Birgit Simon; Stephan Schmidt; Carsten Lukas; Jürgen Gieseke; Frank Träber; Dirk L Knol; Winfried A Willinek; Jeroen J G Geurts; Hans H Schild; Frederik Barkhof; Mike P Wattjes Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-01-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Bester; J H Jensen; J S Babb; A Tabesh; L Miles; J Herbert; R I Grossman; M Inglese Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Christian Enzinger; Frederik Barkhof; Olga Ciccarelli; Massimo Filippi; Ludwig Kappos; Maria A Rocca; Stefan Ropele; Àlex Rovira; Torben Schneider; Nicola de Stefano; Hugo Vrenken; Claudia Wheeler-Kingshott; Jens Wuerfel; Franz Fazekas Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: J Maranzano; M Dadar; D A Rudko; D De Nigris; C Elliott; J S Gati; S A Morrow; R S Menon; D L Collins; D L Arnold; S Narayanan Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Daniel L Schwartz; Ian Tagge; Katherine Powers; Sinyeob Ahn; Rohit Bakshi; Peter A Calabresi; R Todd Constable; John Grinstead; Roland G Henry; Govind Nair; Nico Papinutto; Daniel Pelletier; Russell Shinohara; Jiwon Oh; Daniel S Reich; Nancy L Sicotte; William D Rooney Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Carmen Tur; Sreeram Ramagopalan; Daniel R Altmann; Benedetta Bodini; Mara Cercignani; Zhaleh Khaleeli; David H Miller; Alan J Thompson; Olga Ciccarelli Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Dejan Jakimovski; Murali Ramanathan; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Niels Bergsland; Deepa P Ramasamay; Ellen Carl; Michael G Dwyer; Robert Zivadinov Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: R Vitorino; S-P Hojjat; C G Cantrell; A Feinstein; L Zhang; L Lee; P O'Connor; T J Carroll; R I Aviv Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Katherine A Koenig; Ken E Sakaie; Mark J Lowe; Jian Lin; Lael Stone; Robert A Bermel; Erik B Beall; Stephen M Rao; Bruce D Trapp; Micheal D Phillips Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 2.546