Literature DB >> 23269401

Sperm motility after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with lightweight meshes: 3-year follow-up of a randomised clinical trial.

E Peeters1, C Spiessens, R Oyen, L De Wever, D Vanderschueren, F Penninckx, M Miserez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyse the effects of lightweight meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair on male fertility aspects, chronic pain development and recurrence at 3-year follow-up.
METHODS: Fifty-nine male patients with a primary, unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia were randomised to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using a standard polypropylene (Marlex(®)) or lightweight mesh (VyproII(®), TiMesh(®)). Patients attended clinical follow-up 3 years postoperatively, at which male fertility aspects, by semen analysis and scrotal ultrasound, chronic pain status (McGill Pain Questionnaire), quality of life (SF-36) and recurrence were assessed, or completed quality of life, pain and hernia-specific questionnaires at home.
RESULTS: In total, 49 patients (83.1 %) completed follow-up (median follow-up = 39.1 months), by questionnaire and/or clinical follow-up. As other semen parameters and scrotal ultrasound results, sperm motility was unchanged compared to 1 year postoperatively, but not significantly different between VyproII(®) and TiMesh(®) versus Marlex(®) patients (-8.5 % and -8 % vs. -2.8 %; P = 0.23). Pain perception and quality of life were comparable between the heavyweight and lightweight groups, and no change was noted in comparison with 1 year postoperatively. Chronic pain incidence was 6.1 % (3 patients), without occurrence of disabling pain. Three patients were clinically diagnosed with a recurrent hernia (5.9 %).
CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in sperm motility in patients operated on with a lightweight mesh compared to patients operated on with a heavyweight mesh 1 year after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair could not be confirmed at 3 years follow-up. Furthermore, heavyweight and lightweight groups were comparable regarding quality of life, chronic pain and recurrence rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23269401     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-012-1028-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  11 in total

Review 1.  Male genital tract injuries after contemporary inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  P F Ridgway; J Shah; A W Darzi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  M S Sajid; C Leaver; M K Baig; P Sains
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Currie; Helen Andrew; Alfredo Tonsi; Paul R Hurley; Sanjay Taribagil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon Nienhuijs; Erik Staal; Luc Strobbe; Camiel Rosman; Hans Groenewoud; Rob Bleichrodt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Biocompatibility of prosthetic meshes in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Marcel Binnebösel; Klaus T von Trotha; Petra Lynen Jansen; Joachim Conze; Ulf P Neumann; Karsten Junge
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 9.623

6.  Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in men with lightweight meshes may significantly impair sperm motility: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ellen Peeters; Carl Spiessens; Raymond Oyen; Liesbeth De Wever; Dirk Vanderschueren; Freddy Penninckx; Marc Miserez
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hester R Langeveld; Martijne van't Riet; Wibo F Weidema; Laurents P S Stassen; Ewout W Steyerberg; Johan Lange; Hendrik J Bonjer; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair.

Authors:  William S Cobb; Kent W Kercher; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.058

9.  Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient.

Authors:  J Cunningham; W J Temple; P Mitchell; J A Nixon; R M Preshaw; N A Hagen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Biomechanical properties of lightweight versus heavyweight meshes for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and their impact on recurrence rates.

Authors:  Christian Hollinsky; Simone Sandberg; Thomas Koch; Sabine Seidler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  9 in total

1.  Lightweight mesh versus heavyweight mesh for laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Wu; X Zhang; Y Liu; D Cao; Y Yu; Y Ma
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Male infertility following inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  A Kordzadeh; M O Liu; N V Jayanthi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Bilateral endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair does not impair male fertility.

Authors:  M M Roos; G J Clevers; E J Verleisdonk; P H Davids; C van de Water; R J Spermon; L S Mulder; J P J Burgmans
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 6.  What do we know about titanized polypropylene meshes? An evidence-based review of the literature.

Authors:  F Köckerling; C Schug-Pass
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Does the use of hernia mesh in surgical inguinal hernia repairs cause male infertility? A systematic review and descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Zhiyong Dong; Stacy Ann Kujawa; Cunchuan Wang; Hong Zhao
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  TEP for elective primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair in men: what do we know?

Authors:  F Köckerling
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia Mesh Repair: Effect on Testicular Blood Flow and Sperm Autoimmunity.

Authors:  Dragan Krnić; Nikica Družijanić; Ivana Štula; Vesna Čapkun; Duška Krnić
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-05-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.