Literature DB >> 23268274

[Clinical efficacy analysis of laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy for 1380 patients with gastric cancer].

Chang-ming Huang1, Jian-xian Lin, Chao-hui Zheng, Ping Li, Jian-wei Xie, Jia-bin Wang, Jun Lu, Qi-yue Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the technical feasibility, safety, and clinical efficacy of laparoscopy assisted radical gastrectomy(LAG) for patients with gastric cancer.
METHODS: Clinical data of 1380 patients with gastric cancer who received LAG from May 2007 to April 2012 were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: LAG was successfully carried out in 1363 patients, and 17 patients(1.2%) were converted to open surgery. The mean operation time, blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes were(196.2±59.2) minutes, (79.7±115.8) ml, and 30.1±11.0, respectively. The average time to ground activities, time to flatus, time to fluid diet, and length of hospital stay were(2.4±1.0) days, (3.3±1.2) days, (4.2±1.6) days, and (12.4±8.5) days, respectively. The postoperative morbidity was 12.1% and the mortality was 0.4%. According to Simple Scatter analysis, the number of surgical cases(surgeons' experience) was negatively related with the rate of converted to open surgery and operation time, but positively with number of dissected lymph nodes. A total of 1332 patients were followed up for 2-51 months(median 19 months), and the 3-year survival rate was 71.0%, the 3-year survival rates in stage I(, stage II(, and stage III( were 94.5%, 83.9%, and 56.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy assisted radical gastrectomy is a safe and feasible procedure with better clinical efficacy for gastric cancer. With improvement in the surgical technology, the conversion rate and operation time decrease, and the number of dissected lymph nodes will increase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23268274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1671-0274


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: results of a comparison with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jian-Xian Lin; Chang-Ming Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Lu Jun; Qi-Yue Chen; Mi Lin; Ruhong Tu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Effects of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and the influence on immune function and inflammatory factors.

Authors:  Zhao Ma; Xuebin Bao; Junbao Gu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Which method is more suitable for advanced gastric cancer with enlarged lymph nodes, laparoscopic radical gastrectomy or open gastrectomy?

Authors:  Qi-Yue Chen; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Ju-Li Lin; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Surgical outcomes of 2041 consecutive laparoscopic gastrectomy procedures for gastric cancer: a large-scale case control study.

Authors:  Jian-Xian Lin; Chang-Ming Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.