Literature DB >> 23267663

Do homologous thermophilic-mesophilic proteins exhibit similar structures and dynamics at optimal growth temperatures? A molecular dynamics simulation study.

Sohini Basu1, Srikanta Sen.   

Abstract

Structure and dynamics both are known to be important for the activity of a protein. A fundamental question is whether a thermophilic protein and its mesophilic homologue exhibit similar dynamics at their respective optimal growth temperatures. We have addressed this question by performing molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of a natural mesophilic-thermophilic homologue pair at their respective optimal growth temperatures to compare their structural, dynamical, and solvent properties. The MD simulations were done in explicit aqueous solvent under periodic boundary and constant pressure and temperature (CPT) conditions and continued for 10.0 ns using the same protocol for the two proteins, excepting the temperatures. The trajectories were analyzed to compare the properties of the two proteins. Results indicated that the dynamical behaviors of the two proteins at the respective optimal growth temperatures were remarkably similar. For the common residues in the thermophilic protein, the rms fluctuations have a general trend to be slightly higher compared to that in the mesophilic counterpart. Lindemann parameter values indicated that only a few residues exhibited solid-like dynamics while the protein as a whole appeared as a molten globule in each case. Interestingly, the water-water interaction was found to be strikingly similar in spite of the difference in temperatures while, the protein-water interaction was significantly different in the two simulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23267663     DOI: 10.1021/ci300474h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  4 in total

1.  Structural Rigidity and Protein Thermostability in Variants of Lipase A from Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Prakash Chandra Rathi; Karl-Erich Jaeger; Holger Gohlke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Maria Kalimeri; Eric Girard; Dominique Madern; Fabio Sterpone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  How conformational flexibility stabilizes the hyperthermophilic elongation factor G-domain.

Authors:  Maria Kalimeri; Obaidur Rahaman; Simone Melchionna; Fabio Sterpone
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Computational comparison of two new fusion proteins for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Nasrin Payab; Karim Mahnam; Mostafa Shakhsi-Niaei
Journal:  Res Pharm Sci       Date:  2018-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.