PURPOSE: To characterize the morphology, prevalence, and topography of subretinal drusenoid deposits, a candidate histological correlate of reticular pseudodrusen, with reference to basal linear deposit (BlinD), a specific lesion of age-related macular degeneration, and to propose a biogenesis model for both lesion. METHODS: Donor eyes with median death-to-preservation of 2:40 hours were postfixed in osmium tannic acid paraphenylenediamine and prepared for macula-wide high-resolution digital sections. Annotated thicknesses of 21 chorioretinal layers were determined at standard locations in sections through the fovea and the superior perifovea. RESULTS: In 22 eyes of 20 white donors (83.1 ± 7.7 years), SDD appeared as isolated or confluent drusenoid dollops punctuated by tufts of retinal pigment epithelium apical processes and associated with photoreceptor perturbation. Subretinal drusenoid deposits and BlinD were detected in 85 and 90% of non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration donors, respectively. Subretinal drusenoid deposit was thick (median, 9.4 μm) and more abundant in the perifovea than in the fovea (P < 0.0001). BlinD was thin (median, 2.1 μm) and more abundant in the fovea than in the perifovea (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Subretinal drusenoid deposits and BlinD prevalence in age-related macular degeneration eyes are high. Subretinal drusenoid deposits organized morphology, topography, and impact on surrounding photoreceptors imply specific processes of biogenesis. Contrasting topographies of subretinal drusenoid deposits and BlinD suggest relationships with differentiable aspects of rod and cone physiology, respectively. A 2-lesion 2-compartment biogenesis model incorporating outer retinal lipid homeostasis is presented.
PURPOSE: To characterize the morphology, prevalence, and topography of subretinal drusenoid deposits, a candidate histological correlate of reticular pseudodrusen, with reference to basal linear deposit (BlinD), a specific lesion of age-related macular degeneration, and to propose a biogenesis model for both lesion. METHODS:Donor eyes with median death-to-preservation of 2:40 hours were postfixed in osmium tannic acid paraphenylenediamine and prepared for macula-wide high-resolution digital sections. Annotated thicknesses of 21 chorioretinal layers were determined at standard locations in sections through the fovea and the superior perifovea. RESULTS: In 22 eyes of 20 white donors (83.1 ± 7.7 years), SDD appeared as isolated or confluent drusenoid dollops punctuated by tufts of retinal pigment epithelium apical processes and associated with photoreceptor perturbation. Subretinal drusenoid deposits and BlinD were detected in 85 and 90% of non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration donors, respectively. Subretinal drusenoid deposit was thick (median, 9.4 μm) and more abundant in the perifovea than in the fovea (P < 0.0001). BlinD was thin (median, 2.1 μm) and more abundant in the fovea than in the perifovea (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION:Subretinal drusenoid deposits and BlinD prevalence in age-related macular degeneration eyes are high. Subretinal drusenoid deposits organized morphology, topography, and impact on surrounding photoreceptors imply specific processes of biogenesis. Contrasting topographies of subretinal drusenoid deposits and BlinD suggest relationships with differentiable aspects of rod and cone physiology, respectively. A 2-lesion 2-compartment biogenesis model incorporating outer retinal lipid homeostasis is presented.
Authors: Tomas Vaisar; Subramaniam Pennathur; Pattie S Green; Sina A Gharib; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Marian C Cheung; Jaeman Byun; Simona Vuletic; Sean Kassim; Pragya Singh; Helen Chea; Robert H Knopp; John Brunzell; Randolph Geary; Alan Chait; Xue-Qiao Zhao; Keith Elkon; Santica Marcovina; Paul Ridker; John F Oram; Jay W Heinecke Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Ronald Klein; Stacy M Meuer; Michael D Knudtson; Sudha K Iyengar; Barbara E K Klein Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2007-11-28 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Martin Rudolf; Mark E Clark; Melissa F Chimento; Chuan-Ming Li; Nancy E Medeiros; Christine A Curcio Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jie Jin Wang; Elena Rochtchina; Anne J Lee; Ee-Munn Chia; Wayne Smith; Robert G Cumming; Paul Mitchell Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: R Theodore Smith; Jackie K Chan; Mihai Busuoic; Vasuki Sivagnanavel; Alan C Bird; N Victor Chong Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jiahn-Dar Huang; J Brett Presley; Melissa F Chimento; Christine A Curcio; Mark Johnson Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2007-05-03 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Martin Rudolf; Goldis Malek; Jeffrey D Messinger; Mark E Clark; Lan Wang; Christine A Curcio Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2008-08-03 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Claudine E Pang; Jeffrey D Messinger; Emma C Zanzottera; K Bailey Freund; Christine A Curcio Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Lars G Fritsche; Robert N Fariss; Dwight Stambolian; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Christine A Curcio; Anand Swaroop Journal: Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 8.929
Authors: S Scott Whitmore; Elliott H Sohn; Kathleen R Chirco; Arlene V Drack; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker; Robert F Mullins Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 21.198