Literature DB >> 23266254

Thoracic aortic surgery: an overview of 40 years clinical practice.

Jos A Bekkers1, Roderick J L M te Riele2, Johanna J M Takkenberg2, Goris Bol Raap2, Jan Hofland3, Jolien W Roos-Hesselink4, Ad J J C Bogers2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to report on the total experience in thoracic aortic surgery over a 40-year time period for a single institution.
METHODS: All 1075 patients who underwent surgery for thoracic aortic pathology from 1972 to 2011 (n = 1159) were included. Patient, procedural, and follow-up information was obtained from hospital records and the civil registry. Patients were grouped into 4 categories: acute type A dissection (n = 261), other ascending aortic/arch surgery (n = 626), descending aortic surgery (n = 175), and thoracoabdominal surgery (n = 97). Risk factors for early and late mortality and the incidence of reoperations were analyzed.
RESULTS: The annual number of operations increased significantly over time. In all 4 patient groups, early mortality (in hospital or within 30 days of operation) decreased significantly over time to 15.3% in group 1, 1.9% in group 2, 0% in group 3, and 10.5% in group 4 during the contemporary time period 2007 to 2011. Overall actuarial survival was 54.3% (95% confidence interval, 50.7-57.9) after 10 years and 27.8% (95% confidence interval, 26.4-38.3) after 20 years. Late survival improved over time, but was reduced compared with the general population and was related predominantly to preexisting risk factors. In 80 patients, 111 reoperations were necessary, most frequently in group 1 patients and in patients with connective tissue disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic aortic operations were performed increasingly during a 40-year time period. Early mortality decreased and late survival increased significantly in all patient groups. A significant proportion of patients required multiple operations.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  26.1; CI; HR; OR; SD; TEVAR; confidence interval; hazard ratio; odds ratio; standard deviation; thoracic endovascular aortic replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23266254     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of spinal cord protective threshold of serum memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, in a rabbit model of paraplegia.

Authors:  Nirmal Panthee; Minoru Ono; Takehito Yamamoto; Masako Ikemura; Tsuruhito Tanaka; Yoshifumi Itoda; Hiroshi Suzuki
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-08-21

2.  Imaging surveillance after open aortic repair: a feasibility study of three-dimensional growth mapping.

Authors:  Yunus Ahmed; Nitesh Nama; Ignas B Houben; Joost A van Herwaarden; Frans L Moll; David M Williams; C Alberto Figueroa; Himanshu J Patel; Nicholas S Burris
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Association between institutional case volume and mortality following thoracic aorta replacement: a nationwide Korean cohort study.

Authors:  Karam Nam; Eun Jin Jang; Jun Woo Jo; Jae Woong Choi; Minkyoo Lee; Ho Geol Ryu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Outcomes of different aortic arch replacement techniques.

Authors:  Djamila Abjigitova; Mostafa M Mokhles; Grigorios Papageorgiou; Jos A Bekkers; Ad J J C Bogers
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 1.620

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.