Literature DB >> 23266160

Comparison of two different adenoidectomy techniques with special emphasize on postoperative nasal mucociliary clearance rates: coblation technique vs. cold curettage.

Mahmut Özkiriş1, Seyhan Karaçavuş, Zeliha Kapusuz, Levent Saydam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cold curettage and coblation techniques for pediatric adenoidectomy by means of intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and pre- and postoperative nasal mucociliary clearance rates.
METHODS: The study included 60 consecutive patients undergoing adenoidectomy operation upon the diagnosis of adenoid hypertrophy ranging in age 4-8 years (mean age: 5.82±1.25 years). Two groups consist of 30 patients. The two different adenoidectomy techniques were compared by means of intraoperative blood loss, operation duration, preoperative and postoperative nasal mucociliary clearance rate (NMCR) values. The nasal mucociliary clearance was described as the velocity (mm/min) of nasal mucociliary transport of the 99mTc-MAA droplet. Rhinoscintigraphy was performed on right nasal cavity before and after the surgery in all the patients.
RESULTS: The average NMCR of the curettage adenoidectomy and coblation adenoidectomy groups before surgery was 1.33±0.20mm/min and 1.35±0.19mm/min, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups before surgery (p=0.615). In the six weeks of the post-operative period, the average NMCR of the curettage adenoidectomy and coblation adenoidectomy groups were 1.80±0.21mm/min and 2.06±0.31mm/min, respectively. The NMCR differences of preoperative and postoperative periods in coblation adenoidectomy group were higher than curettage adenoidectomy group (p<0.001). Mean operative time was 20.5±5.5min for coblation adenoidectomy group (n: 30), and 13.5±5.2min for curettage adenoidectomy group (n: 30). Mean intraoperative blood loss was 5.25±3.5ml for coblation adenoidectomy group, and 21.55±8.2ml for curettage adenoidectomy group. The difference between mean intraoperative blood loss and operative time of two groups were statistically significant (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The coblation technique provides a less bleeding surgical bed but a longer operation time when compared to curettage technique. Also the better NMCR values that we have found with coblation adenoidectomy may be translated to a more rapid recovery of ciliary function of the surface mucosa.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23266160     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  5 in total

1.  The Comparison between Microdebrider Assisted Adenoidectomy and Coblation Adenoidectomy: Analyzing the Intraoperative Parameters and Post-operative Recovery.

Authors:  Jaskaran Singh; Bhanu Bhardwaj
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-09-27

Review 2.  Nasal Mucociliary Clearance in Adenoid Hypertrophy and Otitis Media with Effusion.

Authors:  Hasmet Yazıcı
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy versus conventional curettage adenoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Liyun Yang; Yamin Shan; Shili Wang; Changping Cai; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-04-11

4.  Video Nasoendoscopic-Assisted Transoral Adenoidectomy with the PEAK PlasmaBlade: A Preliminary Report of a Case Series.

Authors:  Chao-Yin Kuo; Yuan-Yung Lin; Hsin-Chien Chen; Cheng-Ping Shih; Chih-Hung Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparative Study for Efficacy and Safety of Adenoidectomy according to the Surgical Method: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Jeong-Whun Kim; Hong Joong Kim; Woo Hyun Lee; Dong-Kyu Kim; Sung Wan Kim; Young Hyo Kim; Jung Gwon Nam; Seok-Won Park; Chan-Soon Park; Woo Yong Bae; Nam-Kyung Yeo; Tae-Bin Won; Seung Hoon Lee; Tae-Hoon Lee; Hyoung Joo Lee; Sang-Wook Kim; Sung-Wook Jeong; Jeong-Seok Choi; Doo Hee Han; Ji Ho Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.