Literature DB >> 23266110

Salmonella infection in a remote, isolated wild pig population.

Michael P Ward1, Brendan D Cowled, Francesca Galea, M Graeme Garner, Shawn W Laffan, Ian Marsh, Katherine Negus, Stephen D Sarre, Andrew P Woolnough.   

Abstract

Although wild pig populations are known to sometimes be infected by Salmonella, the situation in Australia has received little attention and few population-based, planned studies have been conducted. Understanding the distribution of Salmonella infections within wild pig populations allows the potential hazard posed to co-grazing livestock to be assessed. We sampled a remote and isolated wild pig population in northwestern Australia. Faecal and mesenteric lymph node samples were collected from 651 wild pigs at 93 locations and cultured for Salmonella. The population sampled was typical of wild pig populations in tropical areas of Australia, and sampling occurred approximately halfway through the population's breeding season (38% of the 229 adult females were pregnant and 35% were lactating). Overall, the prevalence of Salmonella infection based on culture of 546 freshly collected faecal samples was 36.3% (95% CI 32.1-40.7%), and based on culture of mesenteric lymph nodes was 11.9% (95% CI, 9.4-15.0%). A total of 39 serovars (139 isolates) were identified--29 in faecal samples and 24 in lymph node samples--however neither Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium nor Salmonella Cholerasuis were isolated. There was a significant (p<0.0001) disagreement between faecal and lymph node samples with respect to Salmonella isolation, with isolation more likely from faecal samples. Prevalence differed between age classes, with piglets being less likely to be faecal-positive but more likely to be lymph node positive than adults. The distribution of faecal-positive pigs was spatially structured, with spatial clusters being identified. Study results suggest that this population of wild pigs is highly endemic for Salmonella, and that Salmonella is transmitted from older to younger pigs, perhaps associated with landscape features such as water features. This might have implications for infection of co-grazing livestock within this environment.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23266110     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.11.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  6 in total

1.  Limited Exchange of Salmonella Among Domestic Pigs and Wild Boars in Italy.

Authors:  Silvia Bonardi; Luca Bolzoni; Renato Giulio Zanoni; Marina Morganti; Margherita Corradi; Stefano Gilioli; Stefano Pongolini
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.184

2.  Salmonella enterica Serovar Hvittingfoss in Bar-Tailed Godwits (Limosa lapponica) from Roebuck Bay, Northwestern Australia.

Authors:  Hannah G Smith; David C Bean; Jane Hawkey; Rohan H Clarke; Richard Loyn; Jo-Ann Larkins; Chris Hassell; Mary Valcanis; William Pitchers; Andrew R Greenhill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Sources of spatial animal and human health data: Casting the net wide to deal more effectively with increasingly complex disease problems.

Authors:  Kim B Stevens; Dirk U Pfeiffer
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-08

4.  Source attribution of salmonellosis by time and geography in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Angus McLure; Craig Shadbolt; Patricia M Desmarchelier; Martyn D Kirk; Kathryn Glass
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Salmonella enterica isolates from Western Australian rangeland goats remain susceptible to critically important antimicrobials.

Authors:  Khalid Al-Habsi; David Jordan; Ali Harb; Tanya Laird; Rongchang Yang; Mark O'Dea; Caroline Jacobson; David W Miller; Una Ryan; Sam Abraham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  The Welfare of Pig-Hunting Dogs in Australia.

Authors:  Bronwyn Orr; Richard Malik; Jacqui Norris; Mark Westman
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.