Literature DB >> 23265827

Microfabricated glucose biosensor for culture well operation.

R M Pemberton1, T Cox, R Tuffin, I Sage, G A Drago, N Biddle, J Griffiths, R Pittson, G Johnson, J Xu, S K Jackson, G Kenna, R Luxton, J P Hart.   

Abstract

A water-based carbon screen-printing ink formulation, containing the redox mediator cobalt phthalocyanine (CoPC) and the enzyme glucose oxidase (GOx), was investigated for its suitability to fabricate glucose microbiosensors in a 96-well microplate format: (1) the biosensor ink was dip-coated onto a platinum (Pt) wire electrode, leading to satisfactory amperometric performance; (2) the ink was deposited onto the surface of a series of Pt microelectrodes (10-500 μm diameter) fabricated on a silicon substrate using MEMS (microelectromechanical systems) microfabrication techniques: capillary deposition proved to be successful; a Pt microdisc electrode of ≥100 μm was required for optimum biosensor performance; (3) MEMS processing was used to fabricate suitably sized metal (Pt) tracks and pads onto a silicon 96 well format base chip, and the glucose biosensor ink was screen-printed onto these pads to create glucose microbiosensors. When formed into microwells, using a 340 μl volume of buffer, the microbiosensors produced steady-state amperometric responses which showed linearity up to 5 mM glucose (CV=6% for n=5 biosensors). When coated, using an optimised protocol, with collagen in order to aid cell adhesion, the biosensors continued to show satisfactory performance in culture medium (linear range to 2 mM, dynamic range to 7 mM, CV=5.7% for n=4 biosensors). Finally, the operation of these collagen-coated microbiosensors, in 5-well 96-well format microwells, was tested using a 5-channel multipotentiostat. A relationship between amperometric response due to glucose, and cell number in the microwells, was observed. These results indicate that microphotolithography and screen-printing techniques can be combined successfully to produce microbiosensors capable of monitoring glucose metabolism in 96 well format cell cultures. The potential application areas for these microbiosensors are discussed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23265827     DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.11.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron        ISSN: 0956-5663            Impact factor:   10.618


  4 in total

Review 1.  Building risk-on-a-chip models to improve breast cancer risk assessment and prevention.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Vidi; James F Leary; Sophie A Lelièvre
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Fabrication and evaluation of a micro(bio)sensor array chip for multiple parallel measurements of important cell biomarkers.

Authors:  Roy M Pemberton; Timothy Cox; Rachel Tuffin; Guido A Drago; John Griffiths; Robin Pittson; Graham Johnson; Jinsheng Xu; Ian C Sage; Rhodri Davies; Simon K Jackson; Gerry Kenna; Richard Luxton; John P Hart
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  Bioconjugation and stabilisation of biomolecules in biosensors.

Authors:  Susana Liébana; Guido A Drago
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 8.000

Review 4.  Recent Advances in the Fabrication and Application of Screen-Printed Electrochemical (Bio)Sensors Based on Carbon Materials for Biomedical, Agri-Food and Environmental Analyses.

Authors:  Gareth Hughes; Kelly Westmacott; Kevin C Honeychurch; Adrian Crew; Roy M Pemberton; John P Hart
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.