Literature DB >> 23265256

Quantum-mechanical analysis of the energetic contributions to π stacking in nucleic acids versus rise, twist, and slide.

Trent M Parker1, Edward G Hohenstein, Robert M Parrish, Nicholas V Hud, C David Sherrill.   

Abstract

Symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) is applied to pairs of hydrogen-bonded nucleobases to obtain the energetic components of base stacking (electrostatic, exchange-repulsion, induction/polarization, and London dispersion interactions) and how they vary as a function of the helical parameters Rise, Twist, and Slide. Computed average values of Rise and Twist agree well with experimental data for B-form DNA from the Nucleic Acids Database, even though the model computations omitted the backbone atoms (suggesting that the backbone in B-form DNA is compatible with having the bases adopt their ideal stacking geometries). London dispersion forces are the most important attractive component in base stacking, followed by electrostatic interactions. At values of Rise typical of those in DNA (3.36 Å), the electrostatic contribution is nearly always attractive, providing further evidence for the importance of charge-penetration effects in π-π interactions (a term neglected in classical force fields). Comparison of the computed stacking energies with those from model complexes made of the "parent" nucleobases purine and 2-pyrimidone indicates that chemical substituents in DNA and RNA account for 20-40% of the base-stacking energy. A lack of correspondence between the SAPT results and experiment for Slide in RNA base-pair steps suggests that the backbone plays a larger role in determining stacking geometries in RNA than in B-form DNA. In comparisons of base-pair steps with thymine versus uracil, the thymine methyl group tends to enhance the strength of the stacking interaction through a combination of dispersion and electrosatic interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23265256     DOI: 10.1021/ja3063309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  18 in total

1.  Understanding the Relative Flexibility of RNA and DNA Duplexes: Stretching and Twist-Stretch Coupling.

Authors:  Lei Bao; Xi Zhang; Ya-Zhou Shi; Yuan-Yan Wu; Zhi-Jie Tan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  A physically grounded damped dispersion model with particle mesh Ewald summation.

Authors:  Joshua A Rackers; Chengwen Liu; Pengyu Ren; Jay W Ponder
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Structural insights into the effects of 2'-5' linkages on the RNA duplex.

Authors:  Jia Sheng; Li Li; Aaron E Engelhart; Jianhua Gan; Jiawei Wang; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Effect of water and ionic liquids on biomolecules.

Authors:  Debasis Saha; Arnab Mukherjee
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2018-02-08

5.  5-Methylation of cytosine in CG:CG base-pair steps: a physicochemical mechanism for the epigenetic control of DNA nanomechanics.

Authors:  Tahir I Yusufaly; Yun Li; Wilma K Olson
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Relative stability of different DNA guanine quadruplex stem topologies derived using large-scale quantum-chemical computations.

Authors:  Jiří Šponer; Arnošt Mládek; Naďa Špačková; Xiaohui Cang; Thomas E Cheatham; Stefan Grimme
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  How methyl-sugar interactions determine DNA structure and flexibility.

Authors:  Korbinian Liebl; Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Contribution of phenylalanine side chain intercalation to the TATA-box binding protein-DNA interaction: molecular dynamics and dispersion-corrected density functional theory studies.

Authors:  Manas Mondal; Sanchita Mukherjee; Dhananjay Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 1.810

9.  Polarizable Force Field for DNA Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator: II. Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Duplex DNA.

Authors:  Justin A Lemkul; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Polarizable Force Field for DNA Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator: I. Refinement Using Quantum Mechanical Base Stacking and Conformational Energetics.

Authors:  Justin A Lemkul; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.