Literature DB >> 23264298

Response to Comment on: Chakera et al. Antenatal diagnosis of fetal genotype determines if maternal hyperglycemia due to a glucokinase mutation requires treatment. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1832-1834.

Ali J Chakera, Victoria L Carleton, Beverley Shields, Glynis P Ross, Andrew T Hattersley.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23264298      PMCID: PMC3526246          DOI: 10.2337/dc12-1497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


× No keyword cloud information.
We appreciate the comments by Tartaglia et al. (1) in response to our study. We agree with Tartaglia et al. that maternal glucose management in glucokinase (GCK) pregnancy should be guided by knowledge of whether the fetus has inherited the mutation from the mother. In our article (2), we propose that fetal genetic testing should be performed if chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis is performed for another reason. Amniocentesis/CVS cannot be recommended as a routine procedure in the management of pregnant women with GCK mutations, as the 1% miscarriage rate is unacceptably high and outweighs the potential benefits of knowing fetal GCK genotype. At present, fetal growth on ultrasound is used as a surrogate marker for fetal GCK status with increasing growth seen when the fetus has not inherited the mutation. Tartaglia et al. raise a valid point that the optimal cutoff is unclear, especially given uncertainty in measurements. If the fetus does not inherit the GCK mutation, maternal hyperglycemia results in an approximately sixfold increase in macrosomia, with mean increase in corrected birth weight of 700 g, ∼1 SD difference (3). Using data from Hindmarsh et al. (4), we estimate that if the abdominal circumference exceeds the 75th percentile, the odds ratio that the child is unaffected is increased by 3.5-fold. If the abdominal circumference exceeds the 90th percentile, this odds ratio increases to sevenfold. The variability in measurement will determine the confidence limits around these estimates, but this will be reduced if repeated measures are used. For this reason we suggest having two values over the 75th percentile in scans separated by 2 weeks before starting insulin. One advantage of this cutoff is that it has an evidence base to support it because Buchanan et al. (5) used this cutoff in a randomized controlled trial. Ultimately, noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (6) will replace the need to make an indirect assessment based on ultrasound and result in individualized care for pregnant women with GCK mutations.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood: the promises.

Authors:  Yuk Ming Dennis Lo
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Use of fetal ultrasound to select metabolic therapy for pregnancies complicated by mild gestational diabetes.

Authors:  T A Buchanan; S L Kjos; M N Montoro; P Y Wu; N G Madrilejo; M Gonzalez; V Nunez; P M Pantoja; A Xiang
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Pregnancy outcome in patients with raised blood glucose due to a heterozygous glucokinase gene mutation.

Authors:  G Spyer; K M Macleod; M Shepherd; S Ellard; A T Hattersley
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  Intrauterine growth and its relationship to size and shape at birth.

Authors:  Peter C Hindmarsh; Michael P P Geary; Charles H Rodeck; John C P Kingdom; Tim J Cole
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.756

5.  Antenatal diagnosis of fetal genotype determines if maternal hyperglycemia due to a glucokinase mutation requires treatment.

Authors:  Ali J Chakera; Victoria L Carleton; Sian Ellard; Jencia Wong; Dennis K Yue; Jason Pinner; Andrew T Hattersley; Glynis P Ross
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Comment on: Chakera et al. Antenatal diagnosis of fetal genotype determines if maternal hyperglycemia due to a glucokinase mutation requires treatment. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1832-1834.

Authors:  Edoardo Tartaglia; Dario Iafusco; Piero Giuliano; Brunella Giugliano; Teresa Sena; Angelo Perrotta; Pasquale Mastrantonio
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 19.112

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.