Literature DB >> 23263899

Routine intraoperative cholangiography during single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 196 consecutive patients.

Norihiro Sato1, Kazunori Shibao, Yasuki Akiyama, Yuzuru Inoue, Yasuhisa Mori, Noritaka Minagawa, Aiichiro Higure, Koji Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has been increasingly performed as a potentially less invasive alternative to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, recent evidences suggest a higher incidence of complications, notably bile duct injuries, in SILC. We reviewed our experiences with routine intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during SILC to investigate its feasibility and usefulness.
METHODS: Among 228 patients who underwent SILC at our institution from September 2009 to July 2012, a total of 196 patients in which an IOC was attempted were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: IOC was successful in 178 of 196 patients, yielding a success rate of 90.8 %. There were no IOC-related complications. Common bile duct (CBD) stones were detected by IOC in 16 patients (8.2 %), all of which were treated by subsequent single-incision laparoscopic CBD exploration or postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with stone extraction. In addition, IOC revealed filling defects in the cystic duct (four patients) and poor passage of contrast medium into the duodenum (one patient). In one patient with severe acute cholecystitis, cholangiography via an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube revealed misinterpretation of CBD as cystic duct.
CONCLUSIONS: We, thus, conclude that routine IOC during SILC is feasible and useful to detect biliary stones and to gain an accurate picture of biliary anatomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23263899     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-2123-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  28 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term operative outcomes.

Authors:  Zhan Guo Cao; Wang Cai; Ming Fang Qin; Hong Zhi Zhao; Ping Yue; Yang Li
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.719

2.  Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Evangelos C Tsimoyiannis; Konstantinos E Tsimogiannis; George Pappas-Gogos; Charalampos Farantos; Nikolaos Benetatos; Paraskevi Mavridou; Adamantia Manataki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Role of intraoperative cholangiography in avoiding bile duct injury.

Authors:  Nader N Massarweh; David R Flum
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Jai Deep Thakur; Mahak Garg; Geetha R Menon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Single-access laparoscopic cholecystectomy with routine intraoperative cholangiogram.

Authors:  Melissa B Bagloo; Gregory F Dakin; Lori P Mormino; Alfons Pomp
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Navarra; E Pozza; S Occhionorelli; P Carcoforo; I Donini
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with routine intraoperative cholangiography and common bile duct exploration via the umbilical port.

Authors:  David Yeo; Sean Mackay; David Martin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S R Markar; A Karthikesalingam; S Thrumurthy; L Muirhead; J Kinross; P Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A prospective controlled trial comparing single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: caution before damage control.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Jai Deep Thakur; Iqbal Singh; Nikhilesh Nain; Garima Mittal; Vikas Gupta
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.719

10.  Retained gallbladder/cystic duct remnant calculi as a cause of postcholecystectomy pain.

Authors:  R M Walsh; J L Ponsky; J Dumot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  6 in total

1.  Optical architecture design for detection of absorbers embedded in visceral fat.

Authors:  Robert Francis; James Florence; Duncan MacFarlane
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Postoperative complications following single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective analysis in 360 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Norihiro Sato; Kazunori Shibao; Yasuhisa Mori; Aiichiro Higure; Koji Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for biliary tract disease.

Authors:  Shu-Hung Chuang; Chih-Sheng Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Management of suspected common bile duct stones on cholangiogram during same-stay cholecystectomy for acute gallstone-related disease.

Authors:  Sandra de Sousa; Olivier Tobler; Pouya Iranmanesh; Jean-Louis Frossard; Philippe Morel; Christian Toso
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  A meta-analysis of the use of intraoperative cholangiography; time to revisit our approach to cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Eoin Donnellan; Jonathan Coulter; Cherian Mathew; Michelle Choynowski; Louise Flanagan; Magda Bucholc; Alison Johnston; Michael Sugrue
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2020-08-15

Review 6.  Role of sonography in assessing complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Andrzej Smereczyński; Teresa Starzyńska; Katarzyna Kołaczyk; Józef Kładny
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2014-06-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.