Sina Esmaeilzadeh1, Emel Ozcan, Nalan Capan. 1. Division of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Ergonomics, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Millet Caddesi, Capa, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey, sinabox@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine effects of ergonomic intervention on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (WUEMSDs) among computer workers. METHODS:Four hundred computer workers answered a questionnaire on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms (WUEMSS). Ninety-four subjects with WUEMSS using computers at least 3 h a day participated in a prospective, randomized controlled 6-month intervention. Body posture and workstation layouts were assessed by the Ergonomic Questionnaire. We used the Visual Analogue Scale to assess the intensity of WUEMSS. The Upper Extremity Function Scale was used to evaluate functional limitations at the neck and upper extremities. Health-related quality of life was assessed with the Short Form-36. After baseline assessment, those in the intervention group participated in a multicomponent ergonomic intervention program including a comprehensive ergonomic training consisting of two interactive sessions, an ergonomic training brochure, and workplace visits with workstation adjustments. Follow-up assessment was conducted after 6 months. RESULTS: In the intervention group, body posture (p < 0.001) and workstation layout (p = 0.002) improved over 6 months; furthermore, intensity (p < 0.001), duration (p < 0.001), and frequency (p = 0.009) of WUEMSS decreased significantly in the intervention group compared with the control group. Additionally, the functional status (p = 0.001), and physical (p < 0.001), and mental (p = 0.035) health-related quality of life improved significantly compared with the controls. There was no improvement of work day loss due to WUEMSS (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Ergonomic intervention programs may be effective in reducing ergonomic risk factors among computer workers and consequently in the secondary prevention of WUEMSDs.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine effects of ergonomic intervention on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (WUEMSDs) among computer workers. METHODS: Four hundred computer workers answered a questionnaire on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms (WUEMSS). Ninety-four subjects with WUEMSS using computers at least 3 h a day participated in a prospective, randomized controlled 6-month intervention. Body posture and workstation layouts were assessed by the Ergonomic Questionnaire. We used the Visual Analogue Scale to assess the intensity of WUEMSS. The Upper Extremity Function Scale was used to evaluate functional limitations at the neck and upper extremities. Health-related quality of life was assessed with the Short Form-36. After baseline assessment, those in the intervention group participated in a multicomponent ergonomic intervention program including a comprehensive ergonomic training consisting of two interactive sessions, an ergonomic training brochure, and workplace visits with workstation adjustments. Follow-up assessment was conducted after 6 months. RESULTS: In the intervention group, body posture (p < 0.001) and workstation layout (p = 0.002) improved over 6 months; furthermore, intensity (p < 0.001), duration (p < 0.001), and frequency (p = 0.009) of WUEMSS decreased significantly in the intervention group compared with the control group. Additionally, the functional status (p = 0.001), and physical (p < 0.001), and mental (p = 0.035) health-related quality of life improved significantly compared with the controls. There was no improvement of work day loss due to WUEMSS (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ergonomic intervention programs may be effective in reducing ergonomic risk factors among computer workers and consequently in the secondary prevention of WUEMSDs.
Authors: Dana Dane; Michael Feuerstein; Grant D Huang; Lennart Dimberg; Danielle Ali; Andrew Lincoln Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Marion Gillen; Irene H Yen; Laura Trupin; Louise Swig; Reiner Rugulies; Kathleen Mullen; Aurelio Font; David Burian; Greg Ryan; Ira Janowitz; Patricia A Quinlan; John Frank; Paul Blanc Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Fredric Gerr; Michele Marcus; Cindy Ensor; David Kleinbaum; Susan Cohen; Alicia Edwards; Eileen Gentry; Daniel J Ortiz; Carolyn Monteilh Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Arianne P Verhagen; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Alex Burdorf; Siobhán M Stynes; Henrica C W de Vet; Bart W Koes Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-12-12
Authors: Hormoz Sanaeinasab; Mohsen Saffari; Firouz Valipour; Hassan Reza Alipour; Mojtaba Sepandi; Faten Al Zaben; Harold G Koenig Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Sharon P Parry; Pieter Coenen; Nipun Shrestha; Peter B O'Sullivan; Christopher G Maher; Leon M Straker Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-11-17
Authors: Nathan Hutting; J Bart Staal; Yvonne F Heerkens; Josephine A Engels; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden Journal: Trials Date: 2013-08-16 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Nathan Hutting; Josephine A Engels; J Bart Staal; Yvonne F Heerkens; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 2.646
Authors: Nathan Hutting; Sarah I Detaille; Josephine A Engels; Yvonne F Heerkens; J Bart Staal; Maria Wg Nijhuis-van der Sanden Journal: J Multidiscip Healthc Date: 2015-07-01
Authors: Nathan Hutting; Yvonne F Heerkens; Josephine A Engels; J Bart Staal; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 2.362