Literature DB >> 23263624

Impact of photodynamic inactivation (PDI) using the photosensitizer chlorin e6 on viability, apoptosis, and proliferation of human corneal endothelial cells.

Jiong Wang1, Tanja Stachon, Timo Eppig, Achim Langenbucher, Berthold Seitz, Nóra Szentmáry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic inactivation (PDI) may be a potential alternative in case of therapy-resistant infectious keratitis. PDI using the photosensitizer chlorin e6 (Ce6) with high photosensitizing efficacy offers a valuable option, also for keratitis. The purpose of our study was to determine the impact of PDI with the photosensitizer Ce6 on viability, apoptosis, and proliferation of human corneal endothelial cells (HCECs), in vitro.
METHODS: Human corneal endothelial cell line was cultured in DMEM/Ham's F12 medium supplemented with 5 % fetal calf serum. HCECs cultures underwent illumination using red (670 nm) light for 13 min following exposure to 50-500 nM concentrations of Ce6 in the culture medium. Twenty-four hours after PDI, cell viability was evaluated by the Alamar blue assay, total DNA content of the cells and apoptosis using the APO-DIRECT Kit, and cell proliferation by the BrdU Cell Proliferation Assay Kit.
RESULTS: Using Ce6 or illumination only, we did not detect significant changes of cell viability, apoptosis, and proliferation. Following PDI, viability and total DNA content of HCECs decreased significantly above 150 nM Ce6 concentration (P < 0.01; P < 0.05). The percentage of apoptotic HCECs increased significantly from 250 nM Ce6 concentration (P < 0.01), and proliferation of endothelial cells decreased significantly (P < 0.05) above 100 nM concentration of Ce6 after PDI.
CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic inactivation using Ce6 decreases viability and proliferation, and also triggers apoptosis of HCECs in vitro. PDI using the photosensitizer Ce6 may be a potential treatment alternative in infectious keratitis. However, to avoid endothelial cell damage, the photosensitizer must not penetrate the endothelium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23263624     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-012-2239-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  27 in total

1.  Fourth-generation fluoroquinolone-resistant bacterial keratitis after refractive surgery.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Garen Mirzaian; Vahid Feiz; Paul C Kang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Limbal and conjunctival epithelium after corneal cross-linking using riboflavin and UVA.

Authors:  Gregor Wollensak; Cosimo Mazzotta; Thomas Kalinski; Saadettin Sel
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas keratitis.

Authors:  P Garg; S Sharma; G N Rao
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Reactive oxygen species-induced apoptosis and necrosis in bovine corneal endothelial cells.

Authors:  K S Cho; E H Lee; J S Choi; C K Joo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  An in vitro resistance study of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin using keratitis isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  R P Kowalski; A N Pandya; L M Karenchak; E G Romanowski; R C Husted; D C Ritterband; M K Shah; Y J Gordon
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Antimicrobial effect of photodynamic therapy using a highly pure chlorin e6.

Authors:  Jong-Hwan Park; Yeon-Hee Moon; Iel-Soo Bang; Yong-Chul Kim; Soo-A Kim; Sang-Gun Ahn; Jung-Hoon Yoon
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Bacterial keratitis: predisposing factors, clinical and microbiological review of 300 cases.

Authors:  T Bourcier; F Thomas; V Borderie; C Chaumeil; L Laroche
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Fluorescence biodistribution and photosensitising activity of toluidine blue o on rat buccal mucosa.

Authors:  N Kömerik; A Curnow; A J MacRobert; C Hopper; P M Speight; M Wilson
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Experimental grounds for using chlorin e6 in the photodynamic therapy of malignant tumors.

Authors:  G A Kostenich; I N Zhuravkin; E A Zhavrid
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.252

10.  In vitro photodynamic therapy with chlorin e6 leads to apoptosis of human vascular smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  Magdalena Wawrzyńska; Wojciech Kałas; Dariusz Biały; Ewa Zioło; Jacek Arkowski; Walentyna Mazurek; Leon Strzadała
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.291

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of photodynamic inactivation (PDI) using the photosensitizer chlorin e6 on viability, apoptosis, and proliferation of human keratocytes in vitro.

Authors:  Jiong Wang; Tanja Stachon; Timo Eppig; Achim Langenbucher; Berthold Seitz; Nóra Szentmáry
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Bacterial keratitis: Photodynamic inactivation reduced experimental inflammation.

Authors:  Mona Deichelbohrer; Ming-Feng Wu; Berthold Seitz; Dirk Hüttenberger; Matthias W Laschke; Hans-Jochen Foth; Bodo Wonnenberg; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Carola Meier; Markus Bischoff; Thomas Tschernig
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  A comprehensive tutorial on in vitro characterization of new photosensitizers for photodynamic antitumor therapy and photodynamic inactivation of microorganisms.

Authors:  Tobias Kiesslich; Anita Gollmer; Tim Maisch; Mark Berneburg; Kristjan Plaetzer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.