Literature DB >> 23263606

Effects of abdominal surgery through a midline incision on postoperative trunk flexion strength in patients with colorectal cancer.

I Paiuk1, I Wasserman, Z Dvir.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abdominal surgery with bowel resection through a midline or transverse incision is performed in most cases of colorectal cancer (CRC). Both incisions affect abdominal wall function and may lead to differences in postoperative clinical outcomes. Although postoperative isometric trunk flexion strength (ITFS) has previously been investigated, the results were based on measurement tools distinguished by poor reproducibility and validity.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproducibility of and variations in ITFS following abdominal surgery using a dynamometer and explore the correlation between ITFS and the scar length.
METHOD: The study group consisted of 22 consecutive patients (15 men and 7 women) referred for surgery. The outcome parameters included ITFS which was measured using a fixed dynamometer and a digital manometer, scar length, weight and pain. Test-retest measurement (3 h apart) of ITFS was taken 1 day before surgery to determine the instruments' reproducibility. Additional measurements of the outcome parameters were taken 1 and 6 weeks postoperatively.
RESULTS: Excellent test-retest correlations (ICC > 0.85) coupled with low standard error of the measurement for both the ITFS and the manometric findings indicated clinically acceptable reproducibility of the findings. Significant pre- and postoperative differences in ITFS were noted using both techniques. Six weeks postoperatively, fair and significant correlations were noted between the dynamometry-based ITFS and both the scar length (r = 0.452) and age (r = 0.498). Of note, scar length and preoperative dynamometric ITFS predicted ITFS 6 weeks postoperatively (F = 102.949, p < 0.001, R(2) = 0.92).
CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of ITFS using dynamometry in elective CRC patients are reproducible, sensitive to clinical changes and allow prediction of postoperative ITFS scores based on their preoperative counterparts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23263606     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-012-1027-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  26 in total

Review 1.  Surgery and the respiratory muscles.

Authors:  N M Siafakas; I Mitrouska; D Bouros; D Georgopoulos
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Hand-held compared with isokinetic dynamometry for measurement of static knee extension torque (parallel reliability of dynamometers).

Authors:  R W Bohannon
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1990-08

3.  Validation of an abdominal muscle strength test with dynamometry.

Authors:  Carlos E Ladeira; Larry W Hess; Benjamin M Galin; Stephan Fradera; Melissa A Harkness
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Structural and functional features of human muscle-tendon unit.

Authors:  T Finni
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Measurement of the tensile strength of the ventral abdominal wall in comparison with scar tissue.

Authors:  C Hollinsky; S Sandberg
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Impaired recovery of strength in older patients after major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  J M Watters; S M Clancey; S B Moulton; K M Briere; J M Zhu
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Maximum static respiratory pressures in healthy elderly men and women: issues of reproducibility and interpretation.

Authors:  A K McConnell; A J Copestake
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.580

8.  Cough gastric pressure and maximum expiratory mouth pressure in humans.

Authors:  William D-C Man; Dimitris Kyroussis; Tracey A Fleming; Alfredo Chetta; Farzaneh Harraf; Naveed Mustfa; Gerrard F Rafferty; Michael I Polkey; John Moxham
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-07-11       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCTN60734227).

Authors:  Christoph M Seiler; Andreas Deckert; Markus K Diener; Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Markus A Weigand; Norbert Victor; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Midline or transverse abdominal incision for right-sided colon cancer-a randomized trial.

Authors:  P G Lindgren; S R Nordgren; T Oresland; L Hultén
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal muscle function and incisional hernia: a systematic review.

Authors:  K K Jensen; M Kjaer; L N Jorgensen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Physical activity recommendations pre and post abdominal wall reconstruction: a scoping review of the evidence.

Authors:  S T Adams; N H Bedwani; L H Massey; A Bhargava; C Byrne; K K Jensen; N J Smart; C J Walsh
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.920

3.  Long-term oncologic outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment of rectal cancer: a propensity-score matching study.

Authors:  Zhengliang Li; Huan Xiong; Tianyu Qiao; Shuai Jiao; Yihao Zhu; Guiyu Wang; Xishan Wang; Qingchao Tang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.030

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.