Literature DB >> 23262565

Incidence of neurosurgical wrong-site surgery before and after implementation of the universal protocol.

Jay A Vachhani1, Jeffrey D Klopfenstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although exceedingly rare, wrong-site surgery (WSS) remains a persistent problem in the United States. The incidence is thought to be 2 to 3 per 10 000 craniotomies and about 6 to 14 per 10 000 spine surgeries. In July 2004, the Joint Commission mandated the Universal Protocol (UP) for all accredited hospitals.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of UP implementation on the incidence of neurosurgical WSS at the University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria/Illinois Neurological Institute.
METHODS: The Morbidity and Mortality Database in the Department of Neurosurgery was reviewed to identify all recorded cases of WSS since 1999. This was compared with the total operative load (excluding endovascular procedures) of all attending neurosurgeons to determine the incidence of overall WSS. A comparison was then made between the incidences before and after UP implementation.
RESULTS: Fifteen WSS events were found with an overall incidence of 0.07% and Poisson 95% confidence interval of 8.4 to 25. All but one of these were wrong-level spine surgeries (14/15). There was only 1 recorded case of wrong-side surgery and this occurred after implementation of the UP. A statistically greater number of WSS events occurred before (n = 12) in comparison with after (n = 3) UP implementation (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: A statistically significant reduction in overall WSS was seen after implementation of the UP. This reduction can be attributed to less frequent wrong-level spine surgery. There was no case of wrong procedure or patient surgery and the 1 case of wrong-side surgery occurred after UP implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23262565     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318283c9ea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  5 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for reducing wrong-site surgery and invasive clinical procedures.

Authors:  Catherine M Algie; Robert K Mahar; Jason Wasiak; Lachlan Batty; Russell L Gruen; Patrick D Mahar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-30

2.  Radiograms Obtained during Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Can Mislead Surgeons into Performing Surgery at the Wrong Level.

Authors:  Chikato Mannoji; Masao Koda; Takeo Furuya; Yuzuru Okamoto; Tamiyo Kon; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Masazumi Murakami
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2014-10-16

3.  An Update on Wrong-Site Spine Surgery.

Authors:  John G DeVine; Norman Chutkan; David Gloystein; Keith Jackson
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-01-06

4.  "It is the left eye, right?".

Authors:  Dvora Pikkel; Adi Sharabi-Nov; Joseph Pikkel
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2014-04-08

5.  Incidence of Wrong-Site Surgery List Errors for a 2-Year Period in a Single National Health Service Board.

Authors:  Alistair Geraghty; Lorna Ferguson; Craig McIlhenny; Paul Bowie
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.243

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.