Literature DB >> 23262376

Predictors of reduced relative dose intensity and its relationship to mortality in women receiving multi-agent chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer.

Rabbie K Hanna1, Marek S Poniewierski, Robin A Laskey, Micael A Lopez, Aaron Shafer, Linda Van Le, Jeffrey Crawford, David C Dale, Paola A Gehrig, Angeles Alvarez Secord, Laura J Havrilesky, Gary H Lyman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is limited information concerning the role of relative dose intensity (RDI) on clinical outcomes in solid tumors. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the prognostic significance of RDI and predictors of reduced RDI in women with newly diagnosed advanced stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.
METHODS: A multi-center retrospective study of women with FIGO stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer treated postoperatively with multi-agent intravenous chemotherapy between 1995 and 2009 was conducted. Data were obtained to include the first four chemotherapy cycles administered. Outcomes included: (1) planned and delivered relative dose intensity (RDI), (2) progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. Survival estimates were based on Kaplan and Meier method, and multivariate analyses were based on logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: Evaluable subjects included 325 women. With median follow-up of 34 months (range, 0.4-170), progression or recurrence was recorded in 241 (73.9%) and death in 179 (54.9%). In multivariate analysis, predictors of reduced planned RDI were: treatment off research protocols (odds ratio [OR]=4.3; P<0.001) and BSA >2m(2) (OR=6.14; P<0.001); predictors of reduced delivered RDI were: BMI over 30 kg/m(2) (OR=2.35; P=0.008) and use of carboplatin (OR=2.71; P=0.008). In multivariate analysis, the following factors were independently associated with OS: delivered RDI <85% (hazard ratio [HR]=1.71; P=0.003) and elevated CA-125 at cycle 1 (HR=2.29; P=0.017).
CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis, reduced chemotherapy RDI for ovarian cancer was associated with lower OS, but not PFS, despite adjustment for established prognostic factors.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23262376     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  26 in total

Review 1.  Impact of obesity on chemotherapy management and outcomes in women with gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Neil S Horowitz; Alexi A Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  The Two Faces of Adjuvant Glucocorticoid Treatment in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Vladimir Djedovic; Yoo-Young Lee; Alexandra Kollara; Taymaa May; Theodore J Brown
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.869

3.  Ovarian Cancer Survival and Chemotherapy Dosing, Body Mass Index, and Body Surface Area : Are We There Yet?

Authors:  S Percy Ivy; Jan H Beumer
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Relationship between severity and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and risk of infection among patients with nonmyeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Yanli Li; Zandra Klippel; Xiaolong Shih; Maureen Reiner; Hong Wang; John H Page
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Impact of Chemotherapy Dosing on Ovarian Cancer Survival According to Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Elisa V Bandera; Valerie S Lee; Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez; C Bethan Powell; Lawrence H Kushi
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 6.  Chemotherapy dosing in overweight and obese patients with cancer.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Alex Sparreboom
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Ovarian Cancer Treatment and Survival.

Authors:  Elisa V Bandera; Valerie S Lee; Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez; C Bethan Powell; Lawrence H Kushi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Impact of Body Weight and Body Composition on Ovarian Cancer Prognosis.

Authors:  Sarah A Purcell; Sarah A Elliott; Candyce H Kroenke; Michael B Sawyer; Carla M Prado
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Pegfilgrastim Maintains Relative Dose Intensity and Decreases Hospitalisations in Patients With Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Kenro Chikazawa; Ken Imai; Takaki Ito; Azusa Kimura; K O Hiroyoshi; Yokota Miho; Tomoyuki Kuwata; Ryo Konno
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Predicting neutropenia risk in patients with cancer using electronic data.

Authors:  Pamala A Pawloski; Avis J Thomas; Sheryl Kane; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; Gary R Shapiro; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.